Thread View: ba.bicycles
11 messages
11 total messages
Started by jcdill
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: jcdill
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
70 lines
5459 bytes
5459 bytes
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1> Briefly: Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk. She suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury. This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws! In my $dayjob I take photos for insurance companies, often asked to take photos at an intersection where an accident happened. About once a month I get an assignment to take photos at an intersection where there was a car/bike accident. (I had one such assignment yesterday.) In all but one assignment so far, the bike came from the driver's right side, riding the wrong way in the bike lane, on the shoulder, or on the sidewalk. When a car is at a stop sign or pulling out from a driveway, the driver does not think they have to be on the alert for fast moving traffic (e.g. something moving faster than a walking pedestrian on the sidewalk) coming from their right. So the driver glances right (to make sure there are no pedestrians) then just as the driver looks left, to see if it's clear to pull out into the roadway, and then pulls out, suddenly the previously hidden (by a fence, by a building, by shrubbery etc.) bike comes into view and is hit or hits the car. The fence, building, or shrubbery poses no serious impairment to seeing a slower moving pedestrian, but with a faster moving bike, suddenly it creates a situation where the driver simply can NOT see the bike before the accident. I don't know the insurance resolutions of these cases. (I don't work directly for the insurance companies, I work for a 3rd party they contract with to have the photos taken.) But I do know that 100% of the time the bicyclist would have completely avoided that accident if they had been following the rules of the road and going the correct way (with the flow of traffic) so that as they approach each driveway and intersection along their route they are in the direction drivers LOOK for oncoming traffic before they pull out on the road. In all of the cases I've seen, there was no reason to prefer this side of the road, the other side of the road was equally accessible, equally safe to ride on a bicycle. The bike riders rode the wrong way because they were either ignorant of the rules of the road, or too lazy to take the time to cross the road and ride in the correct direction. The single exception (in my $dayjob assignments) was for an accident where the bike was going with the flow of traffic. Except the bicyclist was on a sidewalk, not in the bike lane - a LARGE and well signed bike lane on the roadway next to the sidewalk - in Santa Cruz (a city that has worked hard to build bike lanes to make it safer to get around on a bike). The car was pulling out of a parking lot, in a driveway next to a building that abuts both the driveway and the sidewalk. From this driveway it is impossible for a car to look left to if it's clear to pull out onto the street without first pulling far enough forward that the vehicle is blocking the sidewalk. When the car pulled forward, the bicyclist (who was hidden from the driver's view by the building) had no time to avoid the car and plowed into the driver's side front fender. Again, this accident was 100% avoidable if the bicyclist had been where the bike was supposed to be, in the bike lane 10 feet away from the building, instead of on the sidewalk adjacent to the building. Folks, please remember the rules of the road are there for a darn good reason, and don't run stop signs, red lights, or ride the wrong way or on the sidewalk. Also, remember that if you do run a red light, the fine is just as high as if you were driving a car. A few months ago I saw a bicyclist pulled over for stop/pause/continue going (because it was "clear") on Harrison in SF. She didn't notice the cop stopped at the light just two lanes to her left, who immediately put on his lights and pulled across and pulled her over. That's a ~$400 mistake. I hope she learned her lesson. Too bad the bicyclist in the linked article hadn't learned this lesson before today. I hope his victim survives! jc
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Jonz
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:05
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:05
19 lines
1634 bytes
1634 bytes
On 7/15/2011 2:31 PM, jcdill wrote: > <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1> > > > Briefly: Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and > plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk. She > suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury. > > This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws! > [snip long discourse on bicycle rider responsibility] Bicyclists ALWAYS run red lights. Bicyclists NEVER obey traffic laws. You were preaching to the deaf, blind, and mentally impaired with this post. Jonz
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: jcdill
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:27
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:27
28 lines
2116 bytes
2116 bytes
On 15/07/11 7:05 PM, Jonz wrote: > On 7/15/2011 2:31 PM, jcdill wrote: >> <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1> >> >> >> >> Briefly: Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and >> plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk. She >> suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury. >> >> This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws! >> > > [snip long discourse on bicycle rider responsibility] > > Bicyclists ALWAYS run red lights. > Bicyclists NEVER obey traffic laws. I disagree with both of those statements. I know bicyclists who do not run red lights, and who obey traffic laws. They may not be in the majority, but they exist. > You were preaching to the deaf, blind, and mentally impaired with this > post. I doubt it. jc
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Jonz
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:58
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:58
23 lines
1939 bytes
1939 bytes
On 7/16/2011 1:27 PM, jcdill wrote: > I disagree with both of those statements. I know bicyclists who do not > run red lights, and who obey traffic laws. They may not be in the > majority, but they exist. > I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light unless the traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally impaired rider realized that (s)he would be squished by oncoming traffic. I really have to wonder what these riders have between their ears when I see a rider blow thru a red light by weaving onto and using the pedestrian crosswalk. I guess they figure that they magically become a pedestrian and traffic is required to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. >> You were preaching to the deaf, blind, and mentally impaired with this >> post. > > I doubt it. > > jc
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Ben Pfaff
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:37
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:37
13 lines
1390 bytes
1390 bytes
Jonz <no.one@ishome.com> writes: > I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light unless the > traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally impaired rider > realized that (s)he would be squished by oncoming traffic. I stop for red lights all the time on my bicycle. I see other bicyclists stop for red lights all the time. You are a liar and a troll. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Jym Dyer
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:27
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:27
16 lines
2027 bytes
2027 bytes
>> = Jonz
>> I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light
>> unless the traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally
>> impaired rider realized that (s)he would be squished by
>> oncoming traffic.
=v= The operative part of this statement is the part about the
subject (that would be "Jonz") being blinded by observation
bias (not having seen something which does, in fact, occur).
> = Ben Pfaff
> You are a liar and a troll.
=v= Anonymous, too. This makes "Jonz" an ideal candidate for
the hateful troll spewfest in the SFGate comments.
<_Jym_>
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Jym Dyer
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:38
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:38
13 lines
1867 bytes
1867 bytes
> = jcdill
> This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws!
=v= San Francisco is statistically most dangerous city in the
West for pedestrians. There are, on average, two people hit
and seriously injured by cars every day. The _Chronicle_ has
gone through major cutbacks and doesn't have the resources to
write a story for every one of these incidents.
=v= Something like this comes along rarely, though, and they
can count on overgeneralization, finger-waggling, and other
fussing, so they churned out two stories about it.
<_Jym_>
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Jef Poskanzer
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:44
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:44
5 lines
1552 bytes
1552 bytes
I've said for years that bicyclists who run red lights are hurting other bicyclists, because every time a bicyclist runs a red light, every driver who sees it hates all bicyclists a little bit more. This sad incident is a reminder that there are also more concrete forms of hurt caused by red-light runners.
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Jonz
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:55
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:55
13 lines
1703 bytes
1703 bytes
On 7/16/2011 9:37 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Jonz<no.one@ishome.com> writes: > >> I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light unless the >> traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally impaired rider >> realized that (s)he would be squished by oncoming traffic. > > I stop for red lights all the time on my bicycle. I see other > bicyclists stop for red lights all the time. > Well, good for you! If I ever run into you, I will stop and pin a gold star on your chest.
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: Robert Neff
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:01
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:01
30 lines
2200 bytes
2200 bytes
Thanks for the sampling of data, JC. I stop at red lights, and slow down and prepare to stop at stop signs if it's not my turn. My experience on Foothill expressway in the evening is that most of the cyclists stop, but my sense is that red light running, and right-turn/U-turn/right turn red light avoidance has become more common amoung the racing/training crowd this year, than has been in the past. It is still low (less than 5 % of solo cyclists, maybe only 2%.) The guys I see (always guys) are on their own, either with a fancy bike and matching kit, or a fine italian steel racing bike and no helmet. Well, that was probably 2 of the five people I've seen. Cycling groups/clubs do stop if the light is red, but become colorblind when the light changes and their lead rider is arriving at the intersection. (This happens to my club, too, and sometimes you hear amazing rationalizations for this.) If you have a conversation starter for when you catch up with one of these guys at the next light, let me know. We can always talk about our local cycling fatalities and injuries from this kind of thing. -- Robert
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
Author: jcdill
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:45
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:45
33 lines
3098 bytes
3098 bytes
On 17/07/11 9:01 PM, Robert Neff wrote: > If you have a conversation starter for when you > catch up with one of these guys at the next light, > let me know. We can always talk about our local > cycling fatalities and injuries from this kind of thing. It wasn't at a light, but I did have a conversation with a woman who ran 2 stop signs on Campus Loop at Stanford about a week ago. I was in the right lane, another car was at my left, we stopped at a stop sign for a pedestrian. The bike ran the stop sign, but fortunately the pedestrian was still in front of my car and thus uninjured. At the next intersection, same thing only *this* time I was stopped to let another vehicle that had the right of way (being at the intersection before I arrived) cross from left to right. That vehicle saw the bicyclist passing my car, realized the bike wasn't going to stop, and stopped in the middle of the intersection (blocking my lane) as the bicyclist blew thru the stop sign to my right. I passed the bicyclist and then pulled into the bike lane at the next stop sign, getting out and holding up my hand as a cop would do when directing traffic, and got the bike to stop. I explained to the rider that she had come very close to getting killed at the previous intersection by not stopping. The rider kept saying she was lost, asking if I knew where a particular building or street was. I said I didn't know, but I did know that she better start stopping at stop signs. She finally GOT it. Rider was wearing regular clothes, riding a bike with upright handlebars and a basket in front, and no helmet - the complete opposite of the typical lycra-clad racers on Foothill. jc
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads