🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

11 total messages Started by jcdill Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#120
Author: jcdill
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
70 lines
5459 bytes
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1>

Briefly:  Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and 
plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk.  She 
suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury.

This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws!

In my $dayjob I take photos for insurance companies, often asked to take 
photos at an intersection where an accident happened.  About once a 
month I get an assignment to take photos at an intersection where there 
was a car/bike accident.  (I had one such assignment yesterday.)  In all 
but one assignment so far, the bike came from the driver's right side, 
riding the wrong way in the bike lane, on the shoulder, or on the 
sidewalk.  When a car is at a stop sign or pulling out from a driveway, 
the driver does not think they have to be on the alert for fast moving 
traffic (e.g. something moving faster than a walking pedestrian on the 
sidewalk) coming from their right.  So the driver glances right (to make 
sure there are no pedestrians) then just as the driver looks left, to 
see if it's clear to pull out into the roadway, and then pulls out, 
suddenly the previously hidden (by a fence, by a building, by shrubbery 
etc.) bike comes into view and is hit or hits the car.  The fence, 
building, or shrubbery poses no serious impairment to seeing a slower 
moving pedestrian, but with a faster moving bike, suddenly it creates a 
situation where the driver simply can NOT see the bike before the accident.

I don't know the insurance resolutions of these cases.  (I don't work 
directly for the insurance companies, I work for a 3rd party they 
contract with to have the photos taken.)  But I do know that 100% of the 
time the bicyclist would have completely avoided that accident if they 
had been following the rules of the road and going the correct way (with 
the flow of traffic) so that as they approach each driveway and 
intersection along their route they are in the direction drivers LOOK 
for oncoming traffic before they pull out on the road.  In all of the 
cases I've seen, there was no reason to prefer this side of the road, 
the other side of the road was equally accessible, equally safe to ride 
on a bicycle.  The bike riders rode the wrong way because they were 
either ignorant of the rules of the road, or too lazy to take the time 
to cross the road and ride in the correct direction.

The single exception (in my $dayjob assignments) was for an accident 
where the bike was going with the flow of traffic.  Except the bicyclist 
was on a sidewalk, not in the bike lane - a LARGE and well signed bike 
lane on the roadway next to the sidewalk - in Santa Cruz (a city that 
has worked hard to build bike lanes to make it safer to get around on a 
bike).  The car was pulling out of a parking lot, in a driveway next to 
a building that abuts both the driveway and the sidewalk.  From this 
driveway it is impossible for a car to look left to if it's clear to 
pull out onto the street without first pulling far enough forward that 
the vehicle is blocking the sidewalk.  When the car pulled forward, the 
bicyclist (who was hidden from the driver's view by the building) had no 
time to avoid the car and plowed into the driver's side front fender. 
Again, this accident was 100% avoidable if the bicyclist had been where 
the bike was supposed to be, in the bike lane 10 feet away from the 
building, instead of on the sidewalk adjacent to the building.

Folks, please remember the rules of the road are there for a darn good 
reason, and don't run stop signs, red lights, or ride the wrong way or 
on the sidewalk.

Also, remember that if you do run a red light, the fine is just as high 
as if you were driving a car.  A few months ago I saw a bicyclist pulled 
over for stop/pause/continue going (because it was "clear") on Harrison 
in SF.  She didn't notice the cop stopped at the light just two lanes to 
her left, who immediately put on his lights and pulled across and pulled 
her over.  That's a ~$400 mistake.  I hope she learned her lesson.  Too 
bad the bicyclist in the linked article hadn't learned this lesson 
before today.  I hope his victim survives!

jc
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#121
Author: Jonz
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:05
19 lines
1634 bytes
On 7/15/2011 2:31 PM, jcdill wrote:
> <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1>
>
>
> Briefly: Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and
> plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk. She
> suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury.
>
> This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws!
>

[snip long discourse on bicycle rider responsibility]

Bicyclists ALWAYS run red lights.
Bicyclists NEVER obey traffic laws.

You were preaching to the deaf, blind, and mentally impaired with this post.

Jonz
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#122
Author: jcdill
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:27
28 lines
2116 bytes
On 15/07/11 7:05 PM, Jonz wrote:
> On 7/15/2011 2:31 PM, jcdill wrote:
>> <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1>
>>
>>
>>
>> Briefly: Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and
>> plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk. She
>> suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury.
>>
>> This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws!
>>
>
> [snip long discourse on bicycle rider responsibility]
>
> Bicyclists ALWAYS run red lights.
> Bicyclists NEVER obey traffic laws.

I disagree with both of those statements.  I know bicyclists who do not 
run red lights, and who obey traffic laws.  They may not be in the 
majority, but they exist.

> You were preaching to the deaf, blind, and mentally impaired with this
> post.

I doubt it.

jc
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#123
Author: Jonz
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:58
23 lines
1939 bytes
On 7/16/2011 1:27 PM, jcdill wrote:

> I disagree with both of those statements. I know bicyclists who do not
> run red lights, and who obey traffic laws. They may not be in the
> majority, but they exist.
>

I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light unless the 
traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally impaired rider 
realized that (s)he would be squished by oncoming traffic.

I really have to wonder what these riders have between their ears when I 
see a rider blow thru a red light by weaving onto and using the 
pedestrian crosswalk. I guess they figure that they magically become a 
pedestrian and traffic is required to stop for a pedestrian in a 
crosswalk.

>> You were preaching to the deaf, blind, and mentally impaired with this
>> post.
>
> I doubt it.
>
> jc
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#124
Author: Ben Pfaff
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:37
13 lines
1390 bytes
Jonz <no.one@ishome.com> writes:

> I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light unless the
> traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally impaired rider
> realized that (s)he would be squished by oncoming traffic.

I stop for red lights all the time on my bicycle.  I see other
bicyclists stop for red lights all the time.

You are a liar and a troll.
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#125
Author: Jym Dyer
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:27
16 lines
2027 bytes
>> = Jonz
>> I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light
>> unless the traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally
>> impaired rider realized that (s)he would be squished by
>> oncoming traffic.

=v= The operative part of this statement is the part about the
subject (that would be "Jonz") being blinded by observation
bias (not having seen something which does, in fact, occur).

> = Ben Pfaff
> You are a liar and a troll.

=v= Anonymous, too.  This makes "Jonz" an ideal candidate for
the hateful troll spewfest in the SFGate comments.
    <_Jym_>
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#126
Author: Jym Dyer
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:38
13 lines
1867 bytes
> = jcdill
> This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws!

=v= San Francisco is statistically most dangerous city in the
West for pedestrians.  There are, on average, two people hit
and seriously injured by cars every day.  The _Chronicle_ has
gone through major cutbacks and doesn't have the resources to
write a story for every one of these incidents.

=v= Something like this comes along rarely, though, and they
can count on overgeneralization, finger-waggling, and other
fussing, so they churned out two stories about it.
    <_Jym_>
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#127
Author: Jef Poskanzer
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:44
5 lines
1552 bytes
I've said for years that bicyclists who run red lights are hurting
other bicyclists, because every time a bicyclist runs a red light,
every driver who sees it hates all bicyclists a little bit more.  This
sad incident is a reminder that there are also more concrete forms of
hurt caused by red-light runners.
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#128
Author: Jonz
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:55
13 lines
1703 bytes
On 7/16/2011 9:37 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Jonz<no.one@ishome.com>  writes:
>
>> I have never, EVER, seen a bicyclist stop for a red light unless the
>> traffic was heavy enough so that even the mentally impaired rider
>> realized that (s)he would be squished by oncoming traffic.
>
> I stop for red lights all the time on my bicycle.  I see other
> bicyclists stop for red lights all the time.
>

Well, good for you! If I ever run into you, I will stop and pin a gold 
star on your chest.
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#129
Author: Robert Neff
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:01
30 lines
2200 bytes
Thanks for the sampling of data, JC.

I stop at red lights, and slow down and
prepare to stop at stop signs if it's not my
turn.

My experience on Foothill expressway in
the evening is that most of the cyclists stop,
but my sense is that red light running, and
right-turn/U-turn/right turn red light
avoidance has become more common amoung the racing/training
crowd this year, than has been in the past.
It is still low (less than 5 % of solo cyclists, maybe
only 2%.)  The guys I see (always guys) are on their
own, either with a fancy bike and matching kit, or
a fine italian steel racing bike and no helmet.
Well, that was probably 2 of the five people I've seen.
Cycling groups/clubs
do stop if the light is red, but become colorblind
when the light changes and their lead rider is arriving
at the intersection.  (This happens to my club, too, and
sometimes you hear amazing rationalizations for this.)

If you have a conversation starter for when you
catch up with one of these guys at the next light,
let me know.  We can always talk about our local
cycling fatalities and injuries from this kind of thing.

-- Robert
Re: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
#130
Author: jcdill
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:45
33 lines
3098 bytes
On 17/07/11 9:01 PM, Robert Neff wrote:

> If you have a conversation starter for when you
> catch up with one of these guys at the next light,
> let me know. We can always talk about our local
> cycling fatalities and injuries from this kind of thing.

It wasn't at a light, but I did have a conversation with a woman who ran 
2 stop signs on Campus Loop at Stanford about a week ago.  I was in the 
right lane, another car was at my left, we stopped at a stop sign for a 
pedestrian.  The bike ran the stop sign, but fortunately the pedestrian 
was still in front of my car and thus uninjured.  At the next 
intersection, same thing only *this* time I was stopped to let another 
vehicle that had the right of way (being at the intersection before I 
arrived) cross from left to right.  That vehicle saw the bicyclist 
passing my car, realized the bike wasn't going to stop, and stopped in 
the middle of the intersection (blocking my lane) as the bicyclist blew 
thru the stop sign to my right.

I passed the bicyclist and then pulled into the bike lane at the next 
stop sign, getting out and holding up my hand as a cop would do when 
directing traffic, and got the bike to stop.  I explained to the rider 
that she had come very close to getting killed at the previous 
intersection by not stopping.  The rider kept saying she was lost, 
asking if I knew where a particular building or street was.  I said I 
didn't know, but I did know that she better start stopping at stop 
signs.  She finally GOT it.

Rider was wearing regular clothes, riding a bike with upright handlebars 
and a basket in front, and no helmet - the complete opposite of the 
typical lycra-clad racers on Foothill.

jc
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads