🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 11 Feb 1997 23:36:07 +0100, in news:<19970211233607967224@pool014-173.innet.be>,
Toon Pels <topels@innet.be> wrote in be.misc:
>Ivo De Broeck <stim@tornado.be> wrote:
>
>> IK STEL DAN OOK VOOR DE NAAMSVERANDERING BE.MARKT NIET DOOR TE VOEREN.
>> (behoudens er iemand bezwaar zou tegen hebben?)
>
>Niet akkoord. Kunnen beide groepen niet in vrede naast elkaar leven?

No.

On 3 Feb 1997 21:30:39 GMT, in news:<slrn5fcm81.81.marc@lolita.belnet.be>
and
On 7 Feb 1997 23:27:35 GMT, in news:<slrn5fnej4.d8.marc@lolita.belnet.be>
I wrote:

> 3)
> 
> The elimination of be.forsale follows no existing procedure.
> Using the rules for a newsgroup creation is an abuse.
> 
> As, in the CFV, the creation a the proposed new "be.markt" group has always
> been tightly bound to the suppression of the "be.forsale" group, the votes in 
> favor cannot be interpreted as solely in favor of the creation of a new group
> named "be.markt", should "be.forsale" be not suppressed.

In other words, the question of the CFV was about a renaming of be.forsale,
and this is what people have been asked to vote for.  
You cannot pretend you have asked another question now.

-- 
Marc Roger