Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #3Supplier selection
From: Charley Scalies
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00
67 lines
3557 bytes
3557 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------22C08653B6C76934EF3765B8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dan O'Leary wrote: >We are working on our supplier selection criteria. I believe the reason you >have criteria is to 1) screen out potential supplies who may be trouble >(not financially stable) and 2) to predict how good a supplier they will >be. >In predicting a good supplier, assume I have only five questions I can ask. >What should they be and how should they be answered. In other words, what >are the characteristics of a potential supplier that have strong >correlation with long term good performance. I guess I am a cynic but I don't trust anything a new supplier tells me unless it can be verified. Therefore, if I can only ask 5 questions they would be "Tell me the name of your largest customer", ..second largest, third largest, etc.," Then I would call the 5 customers to find out for myself just how capable and reliable they are. Past performance is the best indicator of future performance. (If I can only pick one factor.) The characteristic that best influences a supplier's performance is the amount of control it has over its processes. It is impossible to have consistently good quality of delivery, products and/or service without consistency; and you cannot achieve consistency without control. The existence of a comprehensive, documented quality system (e.g., ISO9000, QS9000 and the like) is an excellent indicator of the amount of control a supplier exercises. If the system has been verfied/registered/etc. by an accredited, recognized third party, you can have a fair degree of confidence that the system described to you is valid. Without that I wouldn't believe anything unless I verified it for myself. (The cynic again.) I have seen far too many quality manuals that deserve the Pulitzer Prize for fiction. Just my humble opinion. Charley -- Charles J. Scalies/2000+ Resources for Managing Quality and Productivity Visit our Resources Web Site at http://pobox.com/~scalies --------------22C08653B6C76934EF3765B8 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Scalies, Charley Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Charley Scalies n: Scalies;Charley org: Charles J. Scalies/2000+ email;internet: scalies@pobox.com x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard --------------22C08653B6C76934EF3765B8--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<35FF2BF8.D3CD9D64@pobox.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,97f28a40b4f26a9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: Charley Scalies <scalies@pobox.com> Subject: Supplier selection Date: 1998/09/16 Message-ID: <35FF2BF8.D3CD9D64@pobox.com> X-Deja-AN: 391852058 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------22C08653B6C76934EF3765B8" X-Received: from pobox.com [209.204.83.88] by snip.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.04) id AC3324CD0096; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 23:10:43 EDT Organization: Charles J. Scalies/2000+ MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality