Thread View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.web
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Emmanuel
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:57
CGI DLL vs dot net
Author: Emmanuel
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:57
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:57
4 lines
897 bytes
897 bytes
I want to ask which is better in the performance for CGI Dll and Dot Net? somebody claim that CGI is as bad as ASP , is there real? Thank you
Re: CGI DLL vs dot net
Author: Hans Galema
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:35
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:35
11 lines
1271 bytes
1271 bytes
Emmanuel wrote: > I want to ask which is better in the performance for CGI Dll and Dot Net? Don't understand your question. Which -and how many- things are you comparing here ? > somebody claim that CGI is as bad as ASP , is there real? What do you mean with ASP ? Like .exe, .php and .pl also .asp is cgi. Hans.
Re: CGI DLL vs dot net
Author: Emmanuel
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:59
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:59
20 lines
1610 bytes
1610 bytes
I say using C++builder to produce a DLL CGI , and using C# to produce a web application, which performance is better because, I am using C++builder to produce a DLL CGI before, I need to know whether I need to give up develop DLL CGI and start to using C# "Hans Galema" <notused@notused.nl> ???? news:424aab8e@newsgroups.borland.com... > Emmanuel wrote: > > I want to ask which is better in the performance for CGI Dll and Dot Net? > > Don't understand your question. Which -and how many- things > are you comparing here ? > > > somebody claim that CGI is as bad as ASP , is there real? > > What do you mean with ASP ? Like .exe, .php and .pl also .asp is cgi. > > Hans.
Re: CGI DLL vs dot net
Author: Hans Galema
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:39
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:39
17 lines
1589 bytes
1589 bytes
Emmanuel wrote: > I say using C++builder to produce a DLL CGI , and using C# to produce a web > application, > which performance is better You are comparing a dll loaded by a webserver with a webapplication ? Then what would that webapplication be ? A dll also or an exe ? > because, I am using C++builder to produce a DLL CGI before, I need to know > whether I need to give up develop DLL CGI and start to using C# Why not do both ? You might find out yourself. And what kind of performance ? Many clients at once ? Handling a databasequery ? Hans.
Re: CGI DLL vs dot net
Author: JJ
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17
26 lines
1931 bytes
1931 bytes
I've used both. And as for performance, I belief when we are talking about online, enterprise applications, this topic is almost errellelavant. In this type of application, most of your performance bottleneck will likely be confined to your IO tasks(DB/File, Connections, and etc...). With that said, If I were you, I would concentrate on the functionality, stability, flexibility, and scalability rather than performance. I believe there's a place for every programming language. Your challenge is to select the most appropriate one for your project/task. Just for your gradification(not as a suggestion or recommendation), .NET (similar to java and JIT) will compile to native code(this will take couple steps though). So what can you lose. Good luck Jeff www.ruamkwamkid.com "Emmanuel" <emmanuel@erphk.com> wrote in message news:424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com... >I want to ask which is better in the performance for CGI Dll and Dot Net? > somebody claim that CGI is as bad as ASP , is there real? > > Thank you > >
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads