Article View: chi.internet
Article #311Re: Porting, Google Voice, bandwidth.com
From: Geoff Gass
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 21:26
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 21:26
62 lines
3902 bytes
3902 bytes
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: > Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>>>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>>>>>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>>>>>>tert in seattle <tert@ftupet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>smr wrote: >>>>>>>>>On 5/30/2013 2:42 PM, Cydrome Leader wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>how often does this happen though (a fed style smackdown)? > >>>>>>>>>Technically daily, because it's only due to the Feds saying so >>>>>>>>>that AT&T lets us into their colos, provides last mile at tariff >>>>>>>>>instead of at a huge profit for them... we do ask the FCC to >>>>>>>>>intervene if they're being dicks a few times a year. It's more >>>>>>>>>of a quiet regulatory enforcement thing than it is what I think >>>>>>>>>you're picturing, a huge, "Break up Ma Bell!" type of government >>>>>>>>>intervention. > >>>>>>>>did all the exploded pieces of Ma Bell gravitate back together in >>>>>>>>the end? > >>>>>>>not completely, verizon and centurylink own large pieces of territory >>>>>>>and there's a couple of smaller ones like fairpoint around as well, >>>>>>>but at&t is back to pretty damned big. > >>>>>>I forgot a major piece, post breakup, at&t still had the equipment >>>>>>manufacturing and labs (western electric and bell labs). that stuff >>>>>>is all different companies like Alcatel-Lucent and Avaya now. > >>>>>AT&T is SBC renamed. SBC bought what had been AT&T Long Lines. > >>>>so? I know the lineage, it's not relevant to tert's question. > >>>Well, whatever you happened to know didn't entirely make it into your >>>followup, like the particularly important bit that today's AT&T itself >>>is a renamed, partly-merged Baby Bell, and not the successor to the >>>pre-divestiture corporate conglomerate. > >>did you even read tert's question? > > Why, yes, Geoff. It was fairly straightforward. Your answer, in part, > "but at&t is back to pretty damned big" was misleading, given that > post-divestiture AT&T didn't make those significant acquisitions, > one of the Baby Bell's did, and what remained of post-divestiture AT&T > after spinning off Western Electric and Bell Labs was acquired by > a Baby Bell. how do you get through your day being so pedantic? how does your head not explode? >>>I didn't know you were moderator of the day. Next time I think something >>>important was missed, I'll make sure to clear it with you to avoid stomping >>>all over your enormous ego. > >>why haven't you renamed the thread yet, ayden? > > I didn't have your permission to do so. knock yourself out, cupcake
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrnkqkpp1.6mk.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!d5ni26272pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ko16ho$mdu$3@reader1.panix.com> <slrnkqk5ig.gtb.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <kod949$7h9$2@news.albasani.net> <slrnkqkapo.n0o.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <kodg1g$n9d$1@news.albasani.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 837b0c45a0,8260ba37813bee0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.68.198.5 with SMTP id iy5mr3109137pbc.3.1370122201819;
Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!d5ni26272pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: Porting, Google Voice, bandwidth.com
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 21:26:57 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Enjoy the Ftupetemic!
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <slrnkqkpp1.6mk.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>
References: <ko16ho$mdu$3@reader1.panix.com>
<slrnkqk5ig.gtb.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <kod949$7h9$2@news.albasani.net>
<slrnkqkapo.n0o.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <kodg1g$n9d$1@news.albasani.net>
Reply-To: glg@tanzenmb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1370122201 6959 66.246.138.5 (1 Jun 2013 21:30:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux)
Bytes: 3603