Article View: comp.mail.headers
Article #218Re: Return-Receipt-To & forwarding...
From: John R MacMillan
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:09
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:09
21 lines
1296 bytes
1296 bytes
| Well, the historical reason this wasn't necessary/desirable/done is |called finger. [...] | I regularly finger people, then look to see when my message was sent. |Result? I know if it was read. Actually, finger has the same problem as many existing read receipts, and return receipts: incorrect user expectation. Here Dave, a knowledgeable computer professional, arrives at a result that is simply not true, because fingerd does not (and can not) know if I have read my mail. Sure Dave is almost certainly aware of this, but many more naive users are not. On _every_ system I've been on that had read receipts (including counting finger as a read receipt), I have either gotten told off by people who ``knew'' I had read my mail when in fact I had not, or who were very confused that their MUA told them I never read their mail when in fact I did.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec31.180958.22688@chance.gts.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!wildcan!sq!chance!johnReferences:
<19921225.001@erik.naggum.no> <sdorner-271292095054@0.0.0.0> <davecb.725771350@yorku.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers,comp.mail.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!wildcan!sq!chance!john From: john@chance.gts.org (John R MacMillan) Subject: Re: Return-Receipt-To & forwarding... Message-ID: <1992Dec31.180958.22688@chance.gts.org> Organization: $HOME References: <19921225.001@erik.naggum.no> <sdorner-271292095054@0.0.0.0> <davecb.725771350@yorku.ca> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:09:58 GMT Lines: 21