Thread View: comp.os.msdos.misc
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by rsl11
Mon, 26 Jul 1993 07:39
Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
Author: rsl11
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 07:39
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 07:39
13 lines
1310 bytes
1310 bytes
Hello there,
I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information
on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me
know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software
that Ican buy? Waht are different ways to detect bad memory chips if any...Using
DEBUG of dos maybe, writting a program that would read and write to a memory location etc....
I would very much appreciate your response...
cneophytou@tesla.ece.ukans.edu
rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Re: Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
Author: Eric Praetzel
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 17:49
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 17:49
23 lines
2048 bytes
2048 bytes
In article <1993Jul26.023904.52079@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: > I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information >on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me >know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software >that Ican buy? QAPlus has a memory test routine. However, most computers do a thorough (but it can be bypassed) memory test when they are first turned on (or hard reset). But that does not mean that it will detect memory problems. I have worked with several computers that had flaky memory chips and they would crash at least every hour (or when-ever I used Windoze). The memory test _never_ failed. If you go into the BIOS settings you can change a lot of parameters. For example the amount of time between refresh cycles and the memory timing in general. If these are not setup properly the computer can do some very strange things if it warms up ... What are proper values? Experiment and find out. If you don't want to do that then you need the specs on the memory chips as well as the data from the mfg. of the chip-set. - Eric
Re: Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
Author: Mike Palmer
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 19:47
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 19:47
15 lines
1657 bytes
1657 bytes
praetzel@maxwell.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Praetzel) writes: >In article <1993Jul26.023904.52079@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: >> I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information >>on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me >>know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software >>that Ican buy? > QAPlus has a memory test routine. > However, most computers do a thorough (but it can be bypassed) memory > test when they are first turned on (or hard reset). But that does not The power on test does not thouroughly test the memory at all. You need to run something like checkit memory test for 24 hours to be reasonably certain that memory is OK.
Re: Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
Author: Bill Vermillion
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1993 14:32
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1993 14:32
49 lines
3108 bytes
3108 bytes
In article <CAs9Hv.4u0@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca> praetzel@maxwell.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Praetzel) writes: >In article <1993Jul26.023904.52079@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: >> I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information >>on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me >>know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software >>that Ican buy? > QAPlus has a memory test routine. > However, most computers do a thorough (but it can be bypassed) memory > test when they are first turned on (or hard reset). But that does not > mean that it will detect memory problems. I have worked with several > computers that had flaky memory chips and they would crash at least > every hour (or when-ever I used Windoze). The memory test _never_ > failed. Hm - that first sentence says it will do a thorough memory test. The second sentence says that it will not detect memory problems. In truth - the power on memory test really only checks if there is a chip in the socket :-( At least I have found that to be the case. I saw a problem where a program contniually dumped core when running. This was after a memory upgrade. I did a strings on the core dump and found that while some of the text was readable, other characters just weren't right. I started to look to see if there was a pattern. And voila! All the printable characters that were wrong, were 1 position higher in the ascii table than they should have been. And then I discovered that it was only the characters that used an even number ascii code. That pointed to a chip with the least significant bit stuck on. So out comes the board. It logically had to be one of the four corner chips in the newest bank. (without board schematics I didn't know how it would be laid out - but one of those had to be the LSB chip). Looked at the four chips, and one of them, which came from the same tube of chips, was a 64k chip, while all others were 256k. POST memory tests really test for only the worst case - and quite often only show problems when the end of probed memory differs from that in CMOS. -- Bill Vermillion - bill@bilver.uucp OR bill@bilver.oau.org
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads