🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.os.msdos.misc
4 messages
4 total messages Started by rsl11 Mon, 26 Jul 1993 07:39
Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
#4012
Author: rsl11
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 07:39
13 lines
1310 bytes
Hello there,

        I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information
on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me
know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software
that Ican buy? Waht are different ways to detect bad memory chips if any...Using
DEBUG of dos maybe, writting a program that would read and write to a memory location etc....

        I would very much appreciate your response...


cneophytou@tesla.ece.ukans.edu
rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Re: Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
#4013
Author: Eric Praetzel
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 17:49
23 lines
2048 bytes
In article <1993Jul26.023904.52079@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>        I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information
>on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me
>know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software
>that Ican buy?

 QAPlus has a memory test routine.
 However, most computers do a thorough (but it can be bypassed) memory
 test when they are first turned on (or hard reset).  But that does not
 mean that it will detect memory problems.  I have worked with several
 computers that had flaky memory chips and they would crash at least
 every hour (or when-ever I used Windoze).  The memory test _never_
 failed.

 If you go into the BIOS settings you can change a lot of parameters.
 For example the amount of time between refresh cycles and the memory
 timing in general.  If these are not setup properly the computer can
 do some very strange things if it warms up ...  What are proper 
 values?  Experiment and find out.  If you don't want to do that then
 you need the specs on the memory chips as well as the data from the
 mfg. of the chip-set.
 
 - Eric
Re: Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
#4014
Author: Mike Palmer
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1993 19:47
15 lines
1657 bytes
praetzel@maxwell.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Praetzel) writes:

>In article <1993Jul26.023904.52079@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>>        I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information
>>on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me
>>know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software
>>that Ican buy?

> QAPlus has a memory test routine.
> However, most computers do a thorough (but it can be bypassed) memory
> test when they are first turned on (or hard reset).  But that does not

The power on test does not thouroughly test the memory at all.  You need
to run something like checkit memory test for 24 hours to be reasonably
certain that memory is OK.
Re: Detecting Bad Memory Chips of the PC
#4016
Author: Bill Vermillion
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1993 14:32
49 lines
3108 bytes
In article <CAs9Hv.4u0@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca> praetzel@maxwell.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Praetzel) writes:
>In article <1993Jul26.023904.52079@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>>        I have posted a message in the news that I needed some information
>>on detecting bad memory chips..In case you can be of any help please let me
>>know...Is there any public domain software available on that? Any software
>>that Ican buy?

> QAPlus has a memory test routine.
> However, most computers do a thorough (but it can be bypassed) memory
> test when they are first turned on (or hard reset).  But that does not
> mean that it will detect memory problems.  I have worked with several
> computers that had flaky memory chips and they would crash at least
> every hour (or when-ever I used Windoze).  The memory test _never_
> failed.

Hm - that first sentence says it will do a thorough memory test.  The
second sentence says that it will not detect memory problems.

In truth - the power on memory test really only checks if there is a
chip in the socket :-(

At least I have found that to be the case.

I saw a problem where a program contniually dumped core when running.

This was after a memory upgrade.

I did a strings on the core dump and found that while some of the text
was readable, other characters just weren't right.   I started to look
to see if there was a pattern.  And voila!    All the printable
characters that were wrong, were 1 position higher in the ascii table
than they should have been.  And then I discovered that it was only the
characters that used an even number ascii code.

That pointed to a chip with the least significant bit stuck on.

So out comes the board.  It logically had to be one of the four corner
chips in the newest bank. (without board schematics I didn't know how
it would be laid out - but one of those had to be the LSB chip).

Looked at the four chips, and one of them, which came from the same
tube of chips, was a 64k chip, while all others were 256k.  

POST memory tests really test for only the worst case - and quite often
only show problems when the end of probed memory differs from that in
CMOS.

-- 
Bill Vermillion - bill@bilver.uucp  OR  bill@bilver.oau.org
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads