Thread View: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Steve Kille
Fri, 15 Mar 1991 10:03
Re: RFC-1148/2: what about underlines
Author: Steve Kille
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1991 10:03
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1991 10:03
26 lines
1605 bytes
1605 bytes
A check on our system here leads to similar results. The feature is used, although not extensively (DECNet addressing, quoating spaces in 1148, and various oddments). You conclude from this that it is not used much, and that the feature is avoidable, and so it does not matter. My conclusions are very different. First, the feature is used for some real amount of valid traffic. I'm sure that the originators and recipients of these messages would not like to hear your dismissal of the validity of their traffic. It clearly does not give undue problems as: - the traffic exists and flows - we have not had lots of complaints from X.400 users who cannot access parts of the 822 world Second, that because it is used, we should make sure that the feature is widely and sensibly supported. The host requiremetns is the means to achieve this. As a consequence, I should feel free to use the feature to make 1148 work in the best possible manner. By this, I mean the best service for those sites (the majority) that correctly support the host requirements in this area. Steve
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads