🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.protocols.iso.x400
6 messages
6 total messages Started by Tero Siili Wed, 16 Dec 1992 10:21
Compulsory address fields
#869
Author: Tero Siili
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 10:21
6 lines
543 bytes
Question: what are the compulsory X.400 address fields?  Specifically,
can an address contain C, ADMD, PRMD, OU and PN but NOT ORG?

Tero Siili
Tero.Siili@fmi.fi
Re: Compulsory address fields
#870
Author: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:13
13 lines
1071 bytes
In article <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi>, siili@sumppu.fmi.fi (Tero Siili) writes:
|> 
|> Question: what are the compulsory X.400 address fields?  Specifically,
|> can an address contain C, ADMD, PRMD, OU and PN but NOT ORG?
|> 
Yes. Look at the addresses used by German academic sites.
(PRMD=university;OU1=university OU)
I personally think that it is a bad idea, but they do not agree with me.
-- 
                   Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94
Re: Compulsory address fields
#876
Author: Markus Kuhn
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:50
24 lines
1781 bytes
hta@boheme.er.sintef.no (Harald Tveit Alvestrand) writes:

>|> Question: what are the compulsory X.400 address fields?  Specifically,
>|> can an address contain C, ADMD, PRMD, OU and PN but NOT ORG?
>Yes. Look at the addresses used by German academic sites.
>(PRMD=university;OU1=university OU)
>I personally think that it is a bad idea, but they do not agree with me.

Oh, there are quite a number of people in the DFN (the German academic
network community) that believe, that a PRMD=dfn and a O=university XY
would have been a MUCH better approach. Today, we have a ADMD of a
PTT (dbp) although the X.400 net of DFN is not connected to the
X.400 Telebox system of dbp. It's really a bad system they've selected
here. You can't determine from a C=de ORAddress, whether it is located
in the DFN net or in the X.400 Telebox. This causes quite a lot confusion
in the gateway world.

Markus

-- 
Markus Kuhn, Computer Science student -=-=- University of Erlangen, Germany
Internet: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  |  X.500 entry available
----- Anyone participating in the use of MS-DOS, Heroin or Cocaine is -----
---- simply not getting the most out of life possible. (Brian Downing) ----
Re: Compulsory address fields
#880
Author: Tim Williams
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:43
12 lines
913 bytes
In article <1992Dec16.102132.23668@nic.funet.fi> siili@sumppu.fmi.fi (Tero Siili) writes:
>
>Question: what are the compulsory X.400 address fields?  Specifically,
>can an address contain C, ADMD, PRMD, OU and PN but NOT ORG?
>
>Tero Siili
>Tero.Siili@fmi.fi

According to the '88 XAPIA docs, none of them are compulsory.  Section 5.2.31
describes the om object representing an OR address, and all attributes are
listed as optional.  Best I can figure, what attributes are necessary
depends on the routing that the mail implementation you are using uses.
Re: Compulsory address fields
#881
Author: John H. Dale
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:43
15 lines
1094 bytes
>>Question: what are the compulsory X.400 address fields?  Specifically,
>>can an address contain C, ADMD, PRMD, OU and PN but NOT ORG?

Not my area, but I have the blue book handy.  There may be
other standards or profile requirements that apply.  But
in X.402 clause 18.5, it seems to say (for the mnemonic
form): 
   Must have one country and admd to specify an ADMD.
   Some combination of a prmd, org, ou, pn, cn (up to one
    of each, except several ou allowed).
   Optionally, one or more dda.
My guess is ou without org makes sense because often the
org is running the prmd.

My guess is that there are other rules that apply as well.
Re: Compulsory address fields
#846
Author: Mike Leavitt
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 03:19
4 lines
605 bytes
Aren't there additional address fields in the U. S. GOSIP specifications
that go beyond the standard and are compulsory?

Mike
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads