🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <murakami.9@hac2arpa.hac.com>, murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com (Gary A. Murakami) writes:
|> I have a requirement for secure (DOD Secret) data communications between
|> two sites.  Having been away from the market for while I don't know
|> what is currently available.  Using STU-III serial port is an option
|> but if there is something better (same ease of operations but maybe
|> faster data rates or designed solely for data comm) then I would be
|> interested in knowing about them.
|> ----
|> Gary Murakami       |  murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com
|> Hughes Training Inc.|  murky@hti.hac.com
|> West Covina, Calif. |

-- 

Try the new AT&T Model 1910 STU-III Type 1 (data only) device, it
operates at 14.4 Kbps and is the only such device approved by NSA
for unattended (hence automated) use.  It also includes the Hayes
command set so that you can actually use the thing.  The other biggie
is that it includes SACS, for creating access control lists based
on DOA and/or key codes. -- This is required for use in unattended
mode.  You can try dialing (800) 243-7883 to find out more.

                                 Robert B. Reinhardt, Senior Staff Analyst
  /                 /            ARINC Research Corporation, MS 5-230,
 /__,_  _  o ____  /_  __.  __   2551 Riva Road, Annapolis, MD. 21401
/_)  (_</_<_/ / <_/ /_(_/|_/ (_  breinhar@srg, breinhar%srg@uunet.uu.net
--
                                 Robert B. Reinhardt, Senior Staff Analyst
  /                 /            ARINC Research Corporation, MS 5-230,
 /__,_  _  o ____  /_  __.  __   2551 Riva Road, Annapolis, MD. 21401
/_)  (_</_<_/ / <_/ /_(_/|_/ (_  breinhar@srg, breinhar%srg@uunet.uu.net

breinhar@rams.srg.af.mil (Bob Reinhardt) writes:


>In article <murakami.9@hac2arpa.hac.com>, murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com (Gary A. Murakami) writes:
>|> I have a requirement for secure (DOD Secret) data communications between
>|> two sites.  Having been away from the market for while I don't know
>|> what is currently available.  Using STU-III serial port is an option
>|> but if there is something better (same ease of operations but maybe
>|> faster data rates or designed solely for data comm) then I would be
>|> interested in knowing about them.
>|> ----
>|> Gary Murakami       |  murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com
>|> Hughes Training Inc.|  murky@hti.hac.com
>|> West Covina, Calif. |

>-- 
  Motorola has a network encryption system that you might want to look at.
The last set of business cards I had for them listed Joe Marino as the
Secure Products Manager, Communications Products Office, Government
Electronics Group in Scottsdale, AZ.  The phone number on the marketing
glossy was (602)441-2185.  I haven't had occasion to use their stuff
(they didn't do DES at the time) since they were only DOD COMSEC oriented.
HTH.

------- Any views expressed are those of myself and not my employer. --------
Steven C. Johnson, WB3IRU / VK2GDS      |
TRW                                     | johnson@trwacs.fp.trw.com
FP1 / 3133                              |         [129.193.172.90]
1 Federal Systems Park Drive            | Phone:        +1 (703) 968.1000
Fairfax, Virginia  22033-4412  U.S.A.   | Fax:          +1 (703) 803.5189
-- 
------- Any views expressed are those of myself and not my employer. --------
Steven C. Johnson, WB3IRU / VK2GDS      |
TRW                                     | johnson@trwacs.fp.trw.com
FP1 / 3133                              |         [129.193.172.90]

In article <johnson.725124138@trwacs> johnson@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Steve Johnson) writes:
>breinhar@rams.srg.af.mil (Bob Reinhardt) writes:

Actually, none of the stuff below is what I said, if you're going
to use my name in an article at least include part of my text :)

Anyway, I forgot about the Motorola NES.  It may also be 
worth looking at it.  But, for the cost and its features
it is a high end product.  If all you need to do is automate
a system of mail polling and light file transfer then it
would be overkill. -- I still recommend looking at
the AT&T Model 1910 Type 1 STU-III for meeting the below
requirement -- but, Gary's question nnow needs to be
"how much and what kind of traffic do I need to pass, blah,
blah, blah?"  Judging from the fact that he was originally
looking at using STU-III serial port and assuming he's talking
about a Sectel 1500 (most people are), I think he only needs
the lower bandwidth and not the NES overkill.

----Bob Reinhardt

>
>
>>In article <murakami.9@hac2arpa.hac.com>, murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com (Gary A. Murakami) writes:
>>|> I have a requirement for secure (DOD Secret) data communications between
>>|> two sites.  Having been away from the market for while I don't know
>>|> what is currently available.  Using STU-III serial port is an option
>>|> but if there is something better (same ease of operations but maybe
>>|> faster data rates or designed solely for data comm) then I would be
>>|> interested in knowing about them.
>>|> ----
>>|> Gary Murakami       |  murakami@hac2arpa.hac.com
>>|> Hughes Training Inc.|  murky@hti.hac.com
>>|> West Covina, Calif. |
>
>>-- 
>  Motorola has a network encryption system that you might want to look at.
>
>------- Any views expressed are those of myself and not my employer. --------
>Steven C. Johnson, WB3IRU / VK2GDS      |