🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: malloc(0)
By: John F. Woods on Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:19

Re: malloc(0)
By: Jos Horsmeier on Mon, 23 Nov 1992 10:41

Re: Memory Usage by C
By: Steve Correll on Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:56

Re: POSIX means *Binary* Compatibility ! NOT !
By: Fergus James HENDERSON on Mon, 23 Nov 1992 03:25

Re: malloc(0)
By: Larry Jones on Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:54

Re: POSIX means *Binary* Compatibility ! NOT !
By: Stephen Friedl on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 21:49

Re: malloc(0)
By: Bill Mitchell on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:17

Re: POSIX means *Binary* Compatibility ! NOT !
By: David Dick on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 17:15

Re: malloc(0)
By: Jos Horsmeier on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 16:20

Re: POSIX means *Binary* Compatibility ! NOT !
By: Martin McCormick on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 13:56

Re: Must an object remain in place? (was: fwrite+fread of pointer)
By: Mark Brader on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 11:02

malloc(0)
By: Jerry Schwarz on Sat, 21 Nov 1992 00:52

POSIX means *Binary* Compatibility ! NOT !
By: Rob Freyder on Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:53

Re: Must an object remain in place? (was: fwrite+fread of pointer)
By: Dik T. Winter on Fri, 20 Nov 1992 00:44

Re: Memory Usage by C
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 20 Nov 1992 02:09

Re: idle query on strtok()
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:28

Memory Usage by C
By: Richard Armstrong on Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:05

Conversion to char* or void* (was: Must an object remain ...)
By: Mark Brader on Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:27

Re: fwrite+fread of pointer
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 07:17

Re: Idle Questions about ANSI C
By: Mark Brader on Thu, 19 Nov 1992 07:14

Must an object remain in place? (was: fwrite+fread of pointer)
By: Mark Brader on Thu, 19 Nov 1992 06:16

idle query on strtok()
By: Jim Segrave on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:19

Re: fwrite+fread of pointer
By: Clive Feather on Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:18

expression & discipline (was: Re: Casting const ...)
By: Kevin Rodgers on Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:09

Where to get ANSI C standard
By: Sathis Menon on Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:34

Re: Idle Questions about ANSI C
By: der Mouse on Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:49

Re: fwrite+fread of pointer
By: der Mouse on Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:45

Re: Header files and "hidden built-in type hacks".
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:45

Re: Casting const; Is this standard conforming?
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 06:58

Re: strcmp() on a non-nil-terminated string
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:30

Re: Casting const; Is this standard conforming?
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:30

Re: Casting const; Is this standard conforming?
By: Larry Jones on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:44

Re: Idle Questions about ANSI C
By: Dan Stieneke on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:46

Re: Casting const; Is this standard conforming?
By: John F. Woods on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:53

Re: strcmp() on a non-nil-terminated string
By: John F. Woods on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:38

Re: strcmp() on a non-nil-terminated string
By: John R. Levine on Tue, 17 Nov 1992 04:53

Casting const; Is this standard conforming?
By: Robert Lupton the Good on Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:08

Re: strcmp() on a non-nil-terminated string
By: Mark Brader on Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:47

strcmp() on a non-nil-terminated string
By: Stephen R. van den Berg on Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:23

Re: fwrite+fread of pointer
By: Richard A. O'Keefe on Mon, 16 Nov 1992 09:42

Re: fwrite+fread of pointer
By: Richard A. O'Keefe on Mon, 16 Nov 1992 09:33

Struct hack one last time (one last time)
By: M. J. Saltzman on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:39

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Christopher R Volpe on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:00

Re: pointer comparisons
By: Stan Brown on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 13:30

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Christopher R Volpe on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:22

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 10:56

Re: pointer comparisons
By: T. William Wells on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 06:48

Re: uninitialized++;
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 03:41

Re: pointer comparisons
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 03:35

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Jerry Schwarz on Thu, 31 Dec 1992 02:33

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:35

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:24

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: T. William Wells on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 19:48

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Bill Campbell on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 18:11

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 18:49

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Christopher R Volpe on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:36

Re: uninitialized++;
By: Mike Ball on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:21

pointer comparisons
By: Stephen R. van den Berg on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:59

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Christopher R Volpe on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:57

Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 10:24

Re: uninitialized++;
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:39

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:22

Re: Overflow in constant expression (was: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3)
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 09:39

OOPS! Make that 15 GCC 2.3.3 bugs!
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 09:24

Overflow in constant expression (was: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3)
By: Mark Brader on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 07:50

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Gordon Burditt on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 00:16

Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Wed, 30 Dec 1992 01:12

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: David Adrien Tanguay on Tue, 29 Dec 1992 20:33

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 29 Dec 1992 06:07

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: J. Eric Townsend on Mon, 28 Dec 1992 17:40

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Jerry Schwarz on Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:19

generating prototypes automatically
By: Marty Leisner on Mon, 28 Dec 1992 01:36

Re: <iso646.h>
By: Erik Naggum on Sun, 27 Dec 1992 21:14

Re: Mixing prototype and non-prototype issues
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 25 Dec 1992 01:41

Re: Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 25 Dec 1992 01:27

Mixing prototype and non-prototype issues
By: Tony Adams on Thu, 24 Dec 1992 23:46

Maximum depth of #if preprocessing directives
By: J. Eric Townsend on Thu, 24 Dec 1992 13:32

Banning the use of `gets' (was Re: definition of strNcpy)
By: Martin Weitzel on Thu, 24 Dec 1992 12:04

Re: Compatability of enum types and integer types
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 24 Dec 1992 08:58

Re: assert
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 24 Dec 1992 02:10

Struct hack one last time
By: M. J. Saltzman on Thu, 24 Dec 1992 00:24

Re: pointer comparison
By: der Mouse on Wed, 23 Dec 1992 16:56

pointer comparison
By: Lars Nyman on Wed, 23 Dec 1992 00:14

Re: Compatability of enum types and integer types
By: John F. Woods on Tue, 22 Dec 1992 21:52

Re: Compatability of enum types and integer types
By: Jerry Schwarz on Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:39

Re: Compatability of enum types and integer types
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 22 Dec 1992 01:29

Re: definition of strNcpy
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 22 Dec 1992 01:20

Compatability of enum types and integer types
By: Ronald F. Guilmette on Mon, 21 Dec 1992 22:56

Re: definition of strNcpy
By: Ray Butterworth [MFCF] on Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:29

Re: <iso646.h>
By: Sakari Jalovaara on Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:08

Re: Curses - need help
By: P E Smee on Fri, 17 May 1991 10:48

Re: sscanf sequential assignment?
By: Stephen Clamage on Fri, 17 May 1991 15:52

Re: bsearch of empty array
By: Doug Gwyn on Fri, 17 May 1991 03:54

sscanf sequential assignment?
By: Stephen R. van den Berg on Fri, 17 May 1991 10:13

Re: How soon can `sizeof (tagged_type)' be used?
By: Bruce Blodgett on Thu, 16 May 1991 19:44

Re: A small programming challenge.
By: Barry Margolin on Thu, 16 May 1991 19:20

Re: bsearch of empty array
By: Chris Dollin on Thu, 16 May 1991 11:20

Re: A small programming challenge.
By: Kevin Spencer on Thu, 16 May 1991 07:32

Re: bsearch of empty array
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 15 May 1991 22:59

bsearch of empty array
By: Chris Dollin on Wed, 15 May 1991 14:49

Re: implicitly continued string constants
By: Henry Spencer on Wed, 15 May 1991 15:51

implicitly continued string constants
By: Clark O. Morgan on Wed, 15 May 1991 08:24

Curses - need help
By: Sunny Gulati on Wed, 15 May 1991 04:02

A small programming challenge.
By: Kevin Pollard on Wed, 15 May 1991 01:43

Re: scanf %x allows leading 0x?!?
By: Peter da Silva on Mon, 13 May 1991 23:16

Re: How soon can `sizeof (tagged_type)' be used?
By: Henry Spencer on Mon, 13 May 1991 17:58

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Doug Gwyn on Mon, 13 May 1991 07:35

Re: const char*
By: Doug Gwyn on Mon, 13 May 1991 07:32

Re: const char*
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 13 May 1991 00:44

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 13 May 1991 00:41

Re: const char*
By: Andre van Dalen on Sun, 12 May 1991 15:31

Re: const char*
By: Bjoern Kriews on Tue, 07 May 1991 19:28

How soon can `sizeof (tagged_type)' be used?
By: Ron Guilmette on Sun, 12 May 1991 07:04

Re: scanf %x allows leading 0x?!?
By: Doug Gwyn on Sun, 12 May 1991 03:33

Re: scanf %x allows leading 0x?!?
By: Stephen Clamage on Sat, 11 May 1991 19:36

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Doug Gwyn on Fri, 10 May 1991 23:58

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Doug Gwyn on Fri, 10 May 1991 23:51

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Mike Vermeulen on Tue, 07 May 1991 14:35

scanf %x allows leading 0x?!?
By: Larry Jones on Thu, 09 May 1991 22:02

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 10 May 1991 04:41

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Steve Summit on Fri, 10 May 1991 02:15

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 10 May 1991 01:10

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Mike Vermeulen on Tue, 07 May 1991 05:49

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Mike Vermeulen on Tue, 07 May 1991 00:56

Re: Interpretation of peculiar declarators?
By: David Michaels on Wed, 08 May 1991 23:46

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 08 May 1991 07:21

Re: Pointers to Incomplete Types in Prototypes
By: Steve Summit on Wed, 08 May 1991 04:33

Re: Interpretation of peculiar declarators?
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 08 May 1991 00:05