🚀 go-pugleaf

Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> 
> On 10 Sep 96 19:12:56 -800 Joseph Waldvogel (joewald@a.crl.com) wrote:
> 
> > >I'm currently using gwcslip.device and Amitcp, and was having trouble driving
> > >my modem @115200 baud. I've tested it with Miami, and it will actually run at
> > >this speed, so my only assumption is that gwcslip.device will not.
> 
> > >Does anyone want to suggest another (c)slip device (that will downgrade
> > >automatically from cslip to slip if necessary)? It should include its own
> > >dialer (although I can try dialer.device, which I use at the moment)
> 
> > If Miami works, then why not keep using it!  As for another device for
> > AmiTcp, why not use SLIP or CSLIP that come with AmiTCP in the first
> > place?  None of them have Built in dialers though.  The ONLY one with
> > a Dialer built in would be AmiPPP.  So if you want to use the
> > ppp.device then use AmiPPP.
> 
> >  How do you know Miami is really working at 115200 baud?  You do know
> > a Normal Amiga is not going to support such a speed in the first place
> > don't ya?  Really need a 040 or 060 processor, and even then it's a
> > maybe.  SOme people say you can with a 030, but I had no luck with my
> > 50Mzh 030 on my A1200. But then I don't use a 640x200 mode, but a High
> > Res MultiScan Productivity mode which is more depanding, and Screen
> > depth also makes a differance.  Best way is with a differnt serial
> > port other then commodores outdated slow built in serial port which
> > was fine for the A1000 back then when 9600 baud modems were still
> > rare, but not now.
> 
> Using a fast serial.device replacement will help a lot. Get 8n1.device or
> BaudBandit.device from Aminet.
> 
Use Baudbandit.device instead of 8n1.device as the 8n1 has more overhead
than baud.. You can notice the difference with downloads
 
Catch You Later !
Mark Vandersteen
mvanders@merlin.net.au