Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc
11 messages
11 total messages
Started by David Longley
Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00
Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: David Longley
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00
36 lines
1999 bytes
1999 bytes
Do the following benchmakes seem correct for a
Pentium 120
256K CELP
32MB EDO RAM
The Cache figures seem low?
public domain version COMPTEST 2.59
computer type: IBM AT or compatible
CPU: Intel Pentium
clock frequency: 122.73 Mhz
bus width: 32 bit
CPU-cache: 1. level: 1 KB, 2. level: 4 KB
maximum RAM thruput (without cache): 59473 KB/s (effective wait states: 3.5)
CPU cache thruput: 1. level: 596591 KB/s, 2. level: 477273 KB/s
system memory: 640 KB
available for DOS: 638 KB
permanently used by DOS and TSRs: 136 KB
extended memory: 31744 KB (INT 15h thruput: 36300 KB/s)
expanded memory: 32064 KB (EMS 4.0, thruput: 32199 KB/s)
other RAM: C8000-C9FFF ( 8 KB)
CC000-DBFFF ( 64 KB) EMS-frame
EC000-ECFFF ( 4 KB)
BIOS-extensions: C0000-C7FFF ( 32 KB) VGA-BIOS
CA000-CB7FF ( 6 KB)
ED000-EDFFF ( 4 KB)
--
David Longley
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: Rajesh Varia
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:00
43 lines
2269 bytes
2269 bytes
In article <819061281snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes:
> Do the following benchmakes seem correct for a
>
> Pentium 120
> 256K CELP
> 32MB EDO RAM
>
> The Cache figures seem low?
>
> CPU-cache: 1. level: 1 KB, 2. level: 4 KB
>
> maximum RAM thruput (without cache): 59473 KB/s (effective wait states: 3.5)
> CPU cache thruput: 1. level: 596591 KB/s, 2. level: 477273 KB/s
>
> extended memory: 31744 KB (INT 15h thruput: 36300 KB/s)
> expanded memory: 32064 KB (EMS 4.0, thruput: 32199 KB/s)
>
> --
> David Longley
>
It seems to be reporting the incorrect cache sizes.
The following is for my P100, 256k 15ns sync, 32 meg 70ns FPR.
I am also currently testing a new M/B which gives 30% better preformance
with the same memory.
CPU-cache: 1. level: 8 KB, 2. level: 256 KB
maximum RAM thruput (without cache): 43034 KB/s (effective wait states: 4.1)
CPU cache thruput: 1.level: 367133 KB/s, 2.level:129925 KB/s
extended memory: 14336 KB (INT 15h thruput: 29801 KB/s)
expanded memory: 14656 KB (EMS 4.0, thruput: 27661 KB/s)
Dhrystones/second: 79941.9 (CPU: 219.2-fold of XT)
Double-Precision Kilowhetstones: 44927.5 (FPU: 462.8-fold of XT w/ 8087)
Double-Precision MFLOPS: 3.884 (FPU: 312.1-fold of XT w/ 8087)
COMPTEST 2.59 (c) 1988-1993 N.J.
--
Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: John Beardmore
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:00
32 lines
1503 bytes
1503 bytes
In article <819061281snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes:
>Do the following benchmakes seem correct for a
>
>Pentium 120
>256K CELP
>32MB EDO RAM
>
>The Cache figures seem low?
>
>public domain version COMPTEST 2.59
>
> computer type: IBM AT or compatible
> CPU: Intel Pentium
> clock frequency: 122.73 Mhz
> bus width: 32 bit
Wot ?? Only 32 bit ??
> CPU-cache: 1. level: 1 KB, 2. level: 4 KB
Naah !
From what I've seen, comptest is quite good with old machines but falls
apart totally on new kit.
I don't know if there are newer releases that are pentium ready ?
--
John Beardmore
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: Rajesh Varia
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 00:00
16 lines
1220 bytes
1220 bytes
In article <30d41bbb.6452768@distort.demon.co.uk>
jezhall@frimley.demon.co.uk "Jeremy Hall" writes:
> Rajesh Varia <raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >I am also currently testing a new M/B which gives 30% better preformance
> >with the same memory.
> >
> What is the motherboard and where can you get it in the uk. TIA.
>
Not yet, this board was given to me by a possible importer.
> Jeremy Hall
>
--
Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: Jeremy Hall
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 00:00
7 lines
903 bytes
903 bytes
Rajesh Varia <raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk> wrote: >I am also currently testing a new M/B which gives 30% better preformance >with the same memory. > What is the motherboard and where can you get it in the uk. TIA. Jeremy Hall
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: obiwan
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 00:00
10 lines
848 bytes
848 bytes
In article <819123345snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>, Rajesh Varia <raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk> wrote: > ... > COMPTEST 2.59 (c) 1988-1993 N.J. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Use Comptest 2.60. ftp://ftp.aimnet.com/pub/users/rickl/
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: Rajesh Varia
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00
20 lines
1330 bytes
1330 bytes
In article <819154806snz@wookie.demon.co.uk>
wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk "John Beardmore" writes:
> In article <819061281snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
> David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes:
>
> > computer type: IBM AT or compatible
> > CPU: Intel Pentium
> > clock frequency: 122.73 Mhz
> > bus width: 32 bit
>
> Wot ?? Only 32 bit ??
>
> --
> John Beardmore
>
As you well know, the external bus on the pentium is 32-bit.
--
Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: John Beardmore
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00
18 lines
1369 bytes
1369 bytes
In article <819232967snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk "Rajesh Varia" writes:
>In article <30d41bbb.6452768@distort.demon.co.uk>
> jezhall@frimley.demon.co.uk "Jeremy Hall" writes:
>
>> Rajesh Varia <raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >I am also currently testing a new M/B which gives 30% better preformance
>> >with the same memory.
>> >
>> What is the motherboard and where can you get it in the uk. TIA.
>>
>Not yet, this board was given to me by a possible importer.
How does it do it ?
--
John Beardmore
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: Mr. Who
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:00
44 lines
2424 bytes
2424 bytes
Rajesh Varia wrote: > > In article <819154806snz@wookie.demon.co.uk> > wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk "John Beardmore" writes: > > > In article <819061281snz@longley.demon.co.uk> > > David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes: > > > > > computer type: IBM AT or compatible > > > CPU: Intel Pentium > > > clock frequency: 122.73 Mhz > > > bus width: 32 bit > > > > Wot ?? Only 32 bit ?? > > > > -- > > John Beardmore > > > As you well know, the external bus on the pentium is 32-bit. > > -- > Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk Sorry, nice try. The Pentium has a 64-bit data bus. Think about this with me for just one minute. 72 Pin Simms are 32 bits wide (+ parity). These _must be installed into Pentium MBs in pairs so that they can be interleaved into a single 64 bit wide data path. If you are referring to the PCI bus, then yes in its current incarnation (rev 2.01) it is a 32 bit bus. However with an upcoming enhancement to the bus it will _also_ be 64 bits wide. Thought I'd straighten out the 32-bit and 64-bit -ness of it all. -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Mr. Who is: | | johnk@sigg.com (Business) | | jkotches@interaccess.com (Personal) | | | | New: The Mr. Who home page | | http://homepage.interaccess.com/~jkotches | +-------------------------------------------+
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: Rajesh Varia
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:00
30 lines
1902 bytes
1902 bytes
In article <30D66364.747C@interaccess.com>
jkotches@interaccess.com "Mr. Who" writes:
> Rajesh Varia wrote:
> >
> > As you well know, the external bus on the pentium is 32-bit.
> >
> > --
> > Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
>
> Sorry, nice try. The Pentium has a 64-bit data bus. Think about
> this with me for just one minute. 72 Pin Simms are 32 bits wide
> (+ parity). These _must be installed into Pentium MBs in pairs so
> that they can be interleaved into a single 64 bit wide data path.
>
> If you are referring to the PCI bus, then yes in its current
> incarnation (rev 2.01) it is a 32 bit bus. However with an
> upcoming enhancement to the bus it will _also_ be 64 bits wide.
>
> Thought I'd straighten out the 32-bit and 64-bit -ness of it all.
>
OK, I missed out a word, the external data bus is 32-bit (ie the one
to the peripherals). Moving to the newer 64-bit PCI bus will not
solve the resistriction.
The memory bus is indeed the full 64-bit. The internal architecture is
a mixture of 32-bit & 64-bit.
--
Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
Re: Endeavour, P120 & 256K CELP Benchmarks ??
Author: David Longley
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 00:00
107 lines
4825 bytes
4825 bytes
In article <819657956snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk "Rajesh Varia" writes:
> In article <819650704snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
> David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes:
>
> > Hmmmm this directory does not exist. It does down to users and
> > that's it. As far as I can make out there is no such thing as a
> > version 2.60!
> > --
> > David Longley
> >
> I've mailed it to you.
>
> --
> Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
>
Hmmmm...that's better:
32MB EDO
120 MHz P120
"256K cache on a stick"
DS 64 VRAM PCI - 2MB
ADAPTEC 2940 PCI
Conner 1.2GB EIDE
Seagate Hawk 2GB SCSI
public domain version MMM COMPTEST 2.60 Page 1
computer type: IBM AT or compatible
CPU: Intel Pentium
clock frequency: 122.73 Mhz
bus width: 32 bit
CPU-cache: 1. level: 8 KB, 2. level: 256 KB
maximum RAM thruput (without cache): 59467 KB/s (effective wait states: 3.5)
CPU cache thruput: 1. level: 415020 KB/s, 2. level: 116675 KB/s
system memory: 640 KB
available for DOS: 640 KB
permanently used by DOS and TSRs: 126 KB
extended memory: 31744 KB (INT 15h thruput: 38079 KB/s)
expanded memory: 32064 KB (EMS 4.0, thruput: 35853 KB/s)
other RAM: CD000-CFFFF ( 12 KB)
D4000-DBFFF ( 32 KB)
DC000-EBFFF ( 64 KB) EMS-frame
EC000-ECFFF ( 4 KB)
EE000-EFFFF ( 8 KB)
F8000-F9FFF ( 8 KB)
BIOS-extensions: C0000-C7FFF ( 32 KB) VGA-BIOS
C8000-CC7FF ( 18 KB)
ED000-EDFFF ( 4 KB)
public domain version MMM COMPTEST 2.60 Page 2
parallel ports: 1
serial ports: 2 (COM1: 16550A, COM2: 16550A)
mathematical coprocessor: Intel Pentium (clock frequency:121.97 MHz)
mouse: NOT INSTALLED
games adaptor: INSTALLED
DOS drives: 6 (A:, B:, C:, D:, E:, F:)
floppy drives: 1 (1 x 1.44 MB 3+")
hard disks: 2
graphics card: Video Graphics Array (VGA)
video-RAM wait states: 12
speed of video output via BIOS: 372869 characters/sec
speed of video output via DOS: 166667 characters/sec (without ANSI driver)
DOS version: 6.22
Dhrystones/second: 94728.5 (CPU: 259.8-fold of XT)
Double-Precision Kilowhetstones: 72727.3 (FPU: 749.1-fold of XT w/ 8087)
Double-Precision MFLOPS: 6.107 (FPU: 490.7-fold of XT w/ 8087)
public domain version MMM COMPTEST 2.60 Page 3
hard disk 1 cylinders: 618
read/write heads: 64
sectors per track: 63
storage capacity: 1275789312 Byte (1216.69 MB)
track-to-track seek time: 7.30 ms
average seek time: 13.70 ms
maximum seek time: 23.00 ms
maximum thruput: 6702 KB/sec
hard disk 2 cylinders: 261
read/write heads: 255
sectors per track: 63
storage capacity: 2146798080 Byte (2047.35 MB)
track-to-track seek time: 0.10 ms
average seek time: 0.10 ms
maximum seek time: 0.00 ms
maximum thruput: 8363 KB/sec (using disk cache)
Does this seem about right?
--
David Longley
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads