🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.databases
Article #303

Re: Panorama Info Wanted

#303
From: Gann Matsuda
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:19
48 lines
2645 bytes
In article <1992Sep11.185430.25855@mail.cornell.edu>, on 11 Sep 1992 18:54:30 GMT,
John T. Chapman <jtc1@cornell.edu> writes:

>
>Well, I can't seem to find my previous posting, so it may be that my news
>server died...
>
>Anyway, I am interested on any opinions on Panorama II. I am especially
>interested in the scripting and lookup features.
>
>Has anyone had experience with this? What problems have you encountered?
>How does Panorama II compare to FileMaker Pro? (FileMaker Pro 2.0, if
>you've seen it...) Key areas are power of macros and scripts,
>pseudo-relational capabilities through lookups, ease of use - especially
>with layout design, multi-user database functionality, and company
>tech/customer support.
>
>Thanks, 
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  John T. Chapman                                     jtc1@cornell.edu
>  Office of Computing and Statistical Consulting
>  Cornell University - College of Human Ecology
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>"I believe the word you're looking for is 'Aaaaaaaaaaaaa'."
>                                             - Penguin, Batman Returns
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Panorama II has a very good macro language and it is very powerful.
It is the fastest flat-file database package available.
The lookup function is quite handy, and it does a pretty good job
of giving P2 relational capabilities.  Of course, it is not a
true relational database, so don't expect too much. :-)

The one thing that Filemaker Pro has over P2 is a better interface.
However, if you're going to be creating custom databases, you can
control what the interface will be using buttons (including icons),
pull-down menus and more.

Filemaker is probably a little easier to use and it is more powerful
in the layout design.  However, P2 layouts are also pretty easy to
design.

P2 does support multi-user databases, although I've never used one.
Come to think of it, I haven't created one, either.  Technical support
from Provue is quite good.  Very nice people there.

Gann Matsuda
Technical Details
Message-ID: <19920911131809IYI4DTN@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucla-mic!MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU!IYI4DTN
References: <1992Sep11.185430.25855@mail.cornell.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.databases
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucla-mic!MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU!IYI4DTN
From: IYI4DTN@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Gann Matsuda)
Subject: Re: Panorama Info Wanted
Message-ID: <19920911131809IYI4DTN@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU>
Sender: MVS NNTP News Reader <NNMVS@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU>
Nntp-Posting-Host: mvs.oac.ucla.edu
References: <1992Sep11.185430.25855@mail.cornell.edu>
Date: 11 Sep 92 13:19:07 PDT
Lines: 48