Re: VA & MD Beltway

Article View: dc.driving

Article #21539

#21539

From: Charles J. Williams
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1993 23:35

12 lines
1178 bytes

In article <1niq7qINNdr6@access.digex.com> mikej@access.digex.com (Mike Jacobs) writes:
>the traffic on the VA parts of the Beltway moves a lot smoother than
>the MD parts? (except the 95N/95S/395/495 snarl, of course)

Which covers most of the beltway in VA anyway.  Other than that, there are
very few exits on the VA side that are of any importance (no offense)

Saying the beltway is fine except for the exits (where the main problems
occur) is rather absurd.

--chas iii
chas@ra.nrl.navy.mil

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C3nAvv.ItG@ra.nrl.navy.mil>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!curie!chas

References: <1niq7qINNdr6@access.digex.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,9faf379951625d76
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-09 23:56:21 PST
Newsgroups: dc.driving
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!curie!chas
From: chas@curie.nrl.navy.mil (Charles J. Williams)
Subject: Re: VA & MD Beltway
Message-ID: <C3nAvv.ItG@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
Keywords: car, roads, highways, aggrivation, the usual stuff...
Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil
Organization: Naval Reseach Lab, Washington, DC; Research Computation Division
References: <1niq7qINNdr6@access.digex.com>
Distribution: dc
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1993 23:35:54 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message