🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4a77go$184@access4.digex.net>,
Moo's Access Point <moobox@access4.digex.net> wrote:
>In article <4a6lu4$eqp@access2.digex.net>,
>Chris Smolinski <cps@access2.digex.net> wrote:
>
>>Did anyone from Digex examine the specifications of these slicks, to see 
>>if they were suitable for 28.8 operation? Sounds to me like Digex bought 
>>cheaper voice grade equipment, rather than the required data grade.
>
>Bell Atlantic purchased, installed, and owns the AT&T SLC-96 <or whatever
>they're called> equipment. 
>
>Bell Atlantic is under no (none, zero, nada) obligation to provision 
>voice quality analog phone lines to support 28.8K. If you can find us 
>something in the mass of Public Utility Commission regulations to 
>demonstrate otherwise, we'd love to hear it.

Did anyone from Digex ask BA if the slicks would support 28.8?

>>>We are in the process of updating our literature to reflect this 
>>>and investigating possible options to support higher speeds of 
>>>connectivity.  We'll keep you updated.
>>
>>Updating literature? That's it? How about updating our credit card 
>>accounts for the service not provided?
>
>While I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, DIGEX cannot be responsible 
>for the non-performance of Bell Atlantic owned services and equipment. 
>

What about the non-performance of Digex's service (compared to what was 
promised) ?

Chris