🚀 go-pugleaf

I'm not a lawyer nor have I studied law, so excuse me if im quite ignorant.
In a trial recently I was dumbfounded by how a Judge "screwed" me.
I filed against my ex-wife who has previously signed a court agreement to pay "half of tuition" for our daughter.
Durring the trial her lawyer questioned the definition of "Tuition". The Judge responded to her saying that she should know his definition of tuition as he has definde it for her in court on other occasions. Well he went on to define it again for her, and the rest of us. His definition of tuition is any payments necessary for the child to continue attending school. I was not awarded this "Tuition." I was only awarded $150 a month for the months that were not payed, but it is much more than 300$ a month for school, and the accounting records were all given to the court.... How is this sortof thing possible when it so obvious to me that he somehow silently redefined "Tuition" in his award? I hate our legal system. 

-- 
/************************************************
There are 10 types of people.
Those who understand binary and those who don't.
************************************************/