🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR





Zax wrote:

> Champerty was a good guy with pasionate views on anonymity.  He also had
> a short fuse.

So has Pit Digger.. And it is good to have a short fuse when it comes to
remops who run their remailers the way Frog-Admin did and don't
apologize or rectify their mistakes when pointed out by other remops.

This group was much too kind on FA! Just because you run Reliable and
know VB doesn't make you a remailer saint! At least the people who
mattered like the main developer of Mixmaster 2.9-3.0 complained to FA..
(and got abused because of it, that seems to be the pattern here)

It is good FA is gone, or we would have had another flood and many
'sock-puppets'.

Regards,
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again

In article <pan.2005.11.09.12.40.58.927295@eelbash.yi.org>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
>> Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering on
>> keywords.
>
> I am filtering on floods not keywords.

Zax is not blocking any posts from being sent. He is filtering them
from his news server so that people that choose to use him to *read*
news get the clean feed. The messages are of course not deleted,
they're just not on his news server.

No posts being *sent* are being blocked. His news server and his
remailer are completely different things. He is not blocking what
people post by any stretch of the imagination. He is providing a clean
news feed for people that choose to not want to read them.

Please read the message that Zax posted about the difference between
providing a clean feed and remailers filtering stuff out.

<dkshb2$ol1$1@bananasplit.info>

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Privacy issue - how to spoof/hide IP when accessing email / usenet

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:24:42 -0500, Joe Fox <Ny152@none.invalid> said
>in alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent:
>
>>Excuse the top-post, but it seems to me that a really good ng to find 
>>solutions involving email anonymity would be alt.privacy.anon-server
>
>Anon servers don't give you anonymity from anyone but the receiver.

Wanna bet?