🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Ron Guilmette Thu, 06 Oct 1988 17:35
Should INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD be bigger for RISC's?
#1759
Author: Ron Guilmette
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 1988 17:35
14 lines
915 bytes
This isn't really a bug.  At worst, it could only be called a "non-feature".

In GCC 1.28, the file integrate.c contains the following:

/* Default max number of insns a function can have and still be inline.
   This is overridden on RISC machines.  */
#ifndef INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD
#define INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD(DECL) ...
#endif

I grepped for the symbol INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD in all the sources and I
found only this one definition of it.  Since the comment says it should
be overridden for RISC machines, then why isn't it?
Should INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD be bigger for RISC's?
#1765
Author: Michael Tiemann
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 1988 00:18
23 lines
1304 bytes
   Date: Thu, 6 Oct 88 10:35:59 PDT
   From: Ron Guilmette <rfg@nsc.nsc.com>


   This isn't really a bug.  At worst, it could only be called a "non-feature".

   In GCC 1.28, the file integrate.c contains the following:

   /* Default max number of insns a function can have and still be inline.
      This is overridden on RISC machines.  */
   #ifndef INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD
   #define INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD(DECL) ...
   #endif

   I grepped for the symbol INTEGRATE_THRESHOLD in all the sources and I
   found only this one definition of it.  Since the comment says it should
   be overridden for RISC machines, then why isn't it?

It was put in very recently, and I have not had access to a RISC
machine since.  That problem should be aleviated soon.

Michael
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads