🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 10:52:15 +0000, Buck Naked 

100% asset forfeiture as well as a 5 year ban on using a computer
would be good as well.
<spamthisaccountyourbastards@gmail.com> wrote:

>SilverStar wrote:
>
>> Buck Naked wrote:
>> 
>>> santos wrote:
>>>
>>>> 8 yrs in prison seems a bit harsh for sending spam email dont you 
>>>> think...
>>>> thats about the same as a very serious assault (permanent injury) or a
>>>> violent rape.... dont think unwanted junk email rates up there...
>>>>
>>>> "Energon Junkie" <energonjunkie@eastlink.nospam.coma> wrote in message
>>>> news:zzcjd.111690$9b.99687@edtnps84...
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.halifaxlive.com/convicted_spam_11062004_0292.php
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah but we are talking about the American justice system here.. the 
>>> one where video taping a movie in the cinima is a 5 year jail term for 
>>> first offence and 10 for second .. yet basic rape will only get you 
>>> 3-5 years if they can prove it, less if you admit you did it.
>> 
>> 
>> Yeah, but we're talking about spam, here. 8 years isn't nearly enough. 
>> He should get 10 years, plus a $2,500,000 fine, as well as having a very 
>> powerful magnet installed in his skull, so any time he gets near a 
>> computer it fritzes out, so he can never do that again. Make an example 
>> of him, and do the same for anyone else who tries it. Eventually, people 
>> will stop trying to spam and we'll have tons more bandwidth available 
>> for use. :P
>
>Not sure about the magnet, but the fine I think should be 75-100% of the profit 
>made during the commission of the crime and yes a higher jail term would be 
>better too, but honestly, nothing short of corporal punishment should be accepted.