🚀 go-pugleaf

RUSiriusA <gdeppe@eastlink.ca> wrote in news:gdeppe-1B662A.19421609022006
@news.telus.net:

> All the whales are rare and intelligent behemuths that deserve as much 
> respect as ones own dying pet dog. 
> 
> 1,000 whales a year are culled for aphrodesiac and other yummy things.
> 
> Bluewater foods make deal with Mitssui corporation in Japan... whom go 
> on whale hunt in Pacific. 
> 
> Bird of Paradise discovered in New Guinea = 2006
> 
> Bird of Paradise gone extinct = 2006
> 
> 
> G.
> 

It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will 
undeniably be considered perfidious by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it 
must be stated that few people realize that the word 
"indistinguishability" is so compromised that I retain it only as a 
pejorative. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting 
some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of 
view or vice versa, I intend to argue that when I hear BlueWater Seafood 
say that everyone and everything discriminates against it -- including 
the writing on the bathroom stalls -- I have to wonder about it. Is it 
entirely feckless? Is it simply being shameless? Or is it merely 
embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue 
believing in itself? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let 
me take a stab at it: BlueWater Seafood claims to have turned over a new 
leaf shortly after getting caught trying to etiolate its enemies. This 
claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by BlueWater 
Seafood's supporters. The truth is that we need to look beyond the most 
immediate and visible problems with BlueWater Seafood. We need to look at 
what is behind these problems and understand that I am not trying to save 
the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to 
subject BlueWater Seafood's ideologies to the rigorous scrutiny they 
warrant. BlueWater Seafood has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice 
with vengeful, cold-blooded backbiters. Is this because it needs their 
help to make our lives a living hell? One might as well ask, "When it 
looks in the mirror in the morning, does BlueWater Seafood see more than 
the same, mephitic face that all disreputable pissants share?" We already 
have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "I demand an apology 
from BlueWater Seafood for its insults". He probably could have added 
that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less malignant 
than BlueWater Seafood. I just want to say that there is a format 
BlueWater Seafood should follow for its next literary endeavor. It 
involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.

Although discourteous rabble-rousers are relatively small in number 
compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size 
and fervor. BlueWater Seafood's memoirs symbolize lawlessness, violence, 
and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of 
us lose more than a little freedom. BlueWater Seafood writes a lot of 
long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it 
constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its 
readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that 
BlueWater Seafood files one grievance after another. And that's why I'm 
writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to stop 
its encroachments on our heritage. There's no way I can do that alone, 
and there's no way I can do it without first stating that its allies 
claim to have no choice but to keep a close eye on those who look like 
they might think an unapproved thought. I wish there were some way to 
help these miserable, cheeky, ethically bankrupt bottom-feeders. They are 
outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. There 
can be no doubt that it's unequivocally astounding that BlueWater Seafood 
has found a way to work the words "semiprofessionalized" and 
"photodisintegration" into its philosophies. However, you may find it 
even more astounding that its lapdogs get a thrill out of protesting. 
They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, 
going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with 
BlueWater Seafood, and meeting some other reprehensible BlueWater Seafood 
clones is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if BlueWater 
Seafood had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it is 
the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a 
wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its lamentations. 
Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of 
BlueWater Seafood". In it, I chronicle all of BlueWater Seafood's 
objectives, from the moonstruck to the disgraceful, and conclude that if 
I were a complete sap, I'd believe BlueWater Seafood's line that mingy 
scum aren't ever snooty. Unfortunately for it, I realize that if 
BlueWater Seafood wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the 
arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal 
anecdotes, or insults. Yes, I realize that BlueWater Seafood and its 
deputies are puppets of ghastly sociopaths, but for the sake of brevity 
I've had to express myself in simplified terms. 

BlueWater Seafood should clarify its point so people like you and me can 
tell what the heck it's talking about. Without clarification, BlueWater 
Seafood's recommendations sound lofty and include some emotionally 
charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. Lest I seem like a 
hypocrite, I should tell you that there may be nothing we can do to 
prevent BlueWater Seafood from making good on its word to judge people 
based solely on hearsay. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to 
the comforting picture purveyed by its secret agents, we experience 
psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to 
review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Did it ever occur to 
BlueWater Seafood that maybe it has an almost mystical faith in Maoism? 
Dream on. BlueWater Seafood's plans for the future are as predictable as 
sunrise. Whenever I convince drossy oppressive-types to stop supporting 
BlueWater Seafood and tolerating its nostrums, its invariant response is 
to provide the pretext for police-state measures. 

BlueWater Seafood thinks that it is beyond reproach. Of course, thinking 
so doesn't make it so. BlueWater Seafood's reasoning is circular and 
therefore invalid. In other words, it always begins an argument with its 
conclusion (e.g., that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that 
it can dole out or retract) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- it 
always arrives at that very conclusion. 

BlueWater Seafood's hallucinations about the benefits of sensationalism 
are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we 
guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. That 
concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that BlueWater 
Seafood's devotees are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave 
a generation of people planted in the mud of a selfish world, to begin a 
new life in the shadows of boosterism. BlueWater Seafood must think that 
being prodigal entitles one to create a new cottage industry around 
BlueWater Seafood's inerudite form of neopaganism. The main dissensus 
between me and BlueWater Seafood is that I maintain that some day, 
BlueWater Seafood will indulge in a vast orgy of murder to sate its 
innate blood-lust and its hatred of its betters. It, on the other hand, 
contends that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial serial 
number or frequency power spectrum. 

BlueWater Seafood's historical record of otiose, sexist ebullitions is 
clearer than the muddled pronouncements of its hangers-on, but that's 
really beside the point. At the same time, BlueWater Seafood likes 
thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why 
it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. 
We just want to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated 
and disillusioned." 

Statements like, "Querulous, temperamental deadbeats are burdened with 
the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which 
they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically" 
accurately express the feelings of most of us here. In case you don't 
know, most people don't realize that BlueWater Seafood has already 
revealed its plans to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic 
human rights. It revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the 
hallmarks of having been written by a foul-mouthed meany. Not only is its 
manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and 
absolutely anecdotal, but BlueWater Seafood likes to quote all of the 
saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of 
Marxism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, it invariably instructs 
its companions to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. 
Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. 
Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual, 
it makes perfect sense in light of BlueWater Seafood's flagitious, self-
serving effusions. Speaking of which, BlueWater Seafood occasionally 
writes letters accusing me and my friends of being politically incorrect 
loons. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is 
doubtless the language in which BlueWater Seafood habitually thinks) and 
serve no purpose other than to convince me that if my memory serves me 
correctly, it thinks we want it to pilfer the national treasure. Excuse 
me, but maybe it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. It 
distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its 
current opinions. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney: 
"BlueWater Seafood's propaganda machine grinds on and on." I want nothing 
more -- or less -- than to build a true community of spirit and purpose 
based on mutual respect and caring. To that task I have consecrated my 
life, and I invite you to do likewise. 

BlueWater Seafood has endorsed the idea of soulless cynicism in a number 
of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its satraps' 
decision to exercise control through indirect coercion or through 
psychological pressure or manipulation. Believe it or not, I really want 
to believe that BlueWater Seafood is a decent, honest organization. 
Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be 
fantasy. The truth is that BlueWater Seafood commonly appoints 
ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these 
people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for BlueWater 
Seafood to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. 
If history follows its course, it should be evident that BlueWater 
Seafood wants me to stop trying to focus on what unites rather than 
divides us. Instead, it'd rather I drop to my knees and beg for mercy. 
Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Mark my words: BlueWater 
Seafood coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its slurs sound like 
they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the brim 
with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. 

According to BlueWater Seafood, skin color means more than skill and 
gender is more impressive than genius. It might as well be reading tea 
leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's 
true and what isn't. Maybe then BlueWater Seafood would realize that it 
has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why 
I feel obligated to inform you that there is a proper place in life for 
hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. 
But when BlueWater Seafood perverts hatred in order to offer stones 
instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world, it 
becomes clear that it claims that coercion in the name of liberty is a 
valid use of state power. Well, I beg to differ. At the risk of sounding 
hopelessly obtuse, BlueWater Seafood wants to tell us how to live, what 
to say, what to think, what to know, and -- most importantly -- what not 
to know. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background. 
If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim 
of your own ignorance. I can't follow BlueWater Seafood's pretzel logic. 
I do, however, know that its offhand remarks are a logical absurdity, a 
series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of 
absurdities, when BlueWater Seafood tells us that unfounded attacks on 
character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best 
way to make a point, it somehow fails to mention that the more we give 
it, the more it wants. It fails to mention that unless it provides 
unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to believe that I 
would be surprised if BlueWater Seafood stopped to communicate and share 
ideas with even one of the people it regularly attacks. And it fails to 
mention that when you tell BlueWater Seafood's cat's-paws that it is 
widely known and beyond dispute that BlueWater Seafood is a master of 
psychological manipulation, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes 
begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing 
that my general thesis is that it keeps telling us that it is as innocent 
as a newborn lamb. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature 
which opposes antagonism was forged by hostile clumsy-types? I didn't 
think so. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish 
my general thesis: What we have been imparting to BlueWater Seafood -- or 
what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely 
intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to 
acknowledge. The devil not only finds too much mischief for idle hands to 
do, but increasingly in our contemporary world, he causes what I call 
batty psychics to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a 
vital community. 

Our national media is controlled by the most acrimonious miscreants I've 
ever seen. That's why you probably haven't heard that there are two 
related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent BlueWater 
Seafood has tried to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce 
and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. The other is 
whether or not BlueWater Seafood is reluctant to resolve problems. It 
always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that of all 
of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands 
out: "BlueWater Seafood is the one who will lead us to our great shining 
future." I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is 
dead wrong. The law of parsimony suggests that BlueWater Seafood accepts 
-- or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept -- the ideological 
premises of diabolism. To cap that off, ignorance is bliss. This may be 
why BlueWater Seafood's apparatchiks are generally all smiles. In a 
previous letter, I announced my intention to expose BlueWater Seafood's 
prevarications for what they really are. Naturally, this announcement 
caused BlueWater Seafood to mutter abuses befitting its character. 
Incidents like that truly demonstrate how it has delivered exactly the 
opposite of what it had previously promised us. Most notably, BlueWater 
Seafood's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and 
domination. And, almost as troubling, its vows of equality did little 
more than convince people that it wants to engage in an endless round of 
finger pointing. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is BlueWater 
Seafood's gossamer grasp of reality. One last thing: BlueWater Seafood's 
insults are surrounded by a halo of phallocentrism.

Andy

hahahaha thank you :-D

"Daril" <daril73%NOSPAM%@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9765F0D8D30Bdaril73NOSPAMgmailco@198.164.200.20...
> RUSiriusA <gdeppe@eastlink.ca> wrote in news:gdeppe-1B662A.19421609022006
> @news.telus.net:
>
>> All the whales are rare and intelligent behemuths that deserve as much
>> respect as ones own dying pet dog.
>>
>> 1,000 whales a year are culled for aphrodesiac and other yummy things.
>>
>> Bluewater foods make deal with Mitssui corporation in Japan... whom go
>> on whale hunt in Pacific.
>>
>> Bird of Paradise discovered in New Guinea = 2006
>>
>> Bird of Paradise gone extinct = 2006
>>
>>
>> G.
>>
>
> It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will
> undeniably be considered perfidious by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it
> must be stated that few people realize that the word
> "indistinguishability" is so compromised that I retain it only as a
> pejorative. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting
> some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of
> view or vice versa, I intend to argue that when I hear BlueWater Seafood
> say that everyone and everything discriminates against it -- including
> the writing on the bathroom stalls -- I have to wonder about it. Is it
> entirely feckless? Is it simply being shameless? Or is it merely
> embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue
> believing in itself? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let
> me take a stab at it: BlueWater Seafood claims to have turned over a new
> leaf shortly after getting caught trying to etiolate its enemies. This
> claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by BlueWater
> Seafood's supporters. The truth is that we need to look beyond the most
> immediate and visible problems with BlueWater Seafood. We need to look at
> what is behind these problems and understand that I am not trying to save
> the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to
> subject BlueWater Seafood's ideologies to the rigorous scrutiny they
> warrant. BlueWater Seafood has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice
> with vengeful, cold-blooded backbiters. Is this because it needs their
> help to make our lives a living hell? One might as well ask, "When it
> looks in the mirror in the morning, does BlueWater Seafood see more than
> the same, mephitic face that all disreputable pissants share?" We already
> have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "I demand an apology
> from BlueWater Seafood for its insults". He probably could have added
> that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less malignant
> than BlueWater Seafood. I just want to say that there is a format
> BlueWater Seafood should follow for its next literary endeavor. It
> involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
>
> Although discourteous rabble-rousers are relatively small in number
> compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size
> and fervor. BlueWater Seafood's memoirs symbolize lawlessness, violence,
> and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of
> us lose more than a little freedom. BlueWater Seafood writes a lot of
> long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it
> constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its
> readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that
> BlueWater Seafood files one grievance after another. And that's why I'm
> writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to stop
> its encroachments on our heritage. There's no way I can do that alone,
> and there's no way I can do it without first stating that its allies
> claim to have no choice but to keep a close eye on those who look like
> they might think an unapproved thought. I wish there were some way to
> help these miserable, cheeky, ethically bankrupt bottom-feeders. They are
> outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. There
> can be no doubt that it's unequivocally astounding that BlueWater Seafood
> has found a way to work the words "semiprofessionalized" and
> "photodisintegration" into its philosophies. However, you may find it
> even more astounding that its lapdogs get a thrill out of protesting.
> They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them,
> going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with
> BlueWater Seafood, and meeting some other reprehensible BlueWater Seafood
> clones is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if BlueWater
> Seafood had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it is
> the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a
> wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its lamentations.
> Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of
> BlueWater Seafood". In it, I chronicle all of BlueWater Seafood's
> objectives, from the moonstruck to the disgraceful, and conclude that if
> I were a complete sap, I'd believe BlueWater Seafood's line that mingy
> scum aren't ever snooty. Unfortunately for it, I realize that if
> BlueWater Seafood wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the
> arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal
> anecdotes, or insults. Yes, I realize that BlueWater Seafood and its
> deputies are puppets of ghastly sociopaths, but for the sake of brevity
> I've had to express myself in simplified terms.
>
> BlueWater Seafood should clarify its point so people like you and me can
> tell what the heck it's talking about. Without clarification, BlueWater
> Seafood's recommendations sound lofty and include some emotionally
> charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. Lest I seem like a
> hypocrite, I should tell you that there may be nothing we can do to
> prevent BlueWater Seafood from making good on its word to judge people
> based solely on hearsay. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to
> the comforting picture purveyed by its secret agents, we experience
> psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to
> review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Did it ever occur to
> BlueWater Seafood that maybe it has an almost mystical faith in Maoism?
> Dream on. BlueWater Seafood's plans for the future are as predictable as
> sunrise. Whenever I convince drossy oppressive-types to stop supporting
> BlueWater Seafood and tolerating its nostrums, its invariant response is
> to provide the pretext for police-state measures.
>
> BlueWater Seafood thinks that it is beyond reproach. Of course, thinking
> so doesn't make it so. BlueWater Seafood's reasoning is circular and
> therefore invalid. In other words, it always begins an argument with its
> conclusion (e.g., that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that
> it can dole out or retract) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- it
> always arrives at that very conclusion.
>
> BlueWater Seafood's hallucinations about the benefits of sensationalism
> are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we
> guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. That
> concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that BlueWater
> Seafood's devotees are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave
> a generation of people planted in the mud of a selfish world, to begin a
> new life in the shadows of boosterism. BlueWater Seafood must think that
> being prodigal entitles one to create a new cottage industry around
> BlueWater Seafood's inerudite form of neopaganism. The main dissensus
> between me and BlueWater Seafood is that I maintain that some day,
> BlueWater Seafood will indulge in a vast orgy of murder to sate its
> innate blood-lust and its hatred of its betters. It, on the other hand,
> contends that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial serial
> number or frequency power spectrum.
>
> BlueWater Seafood's historical record of otiose, sexist ebullitions is
> clearer than the muddled pronouncements of its hangers-on, but that's
> really beside the point. At the same time, BlueWater Seafood likes
> thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why
> it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you.
> We just want to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated
> and disillusioned."
>
> Statements like, "Querulous, temperamental deadbeats are burdened with
> the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which
> they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically"
> accurately express the feelings of most of us here. In case you don't
> know, most people don't realize that BlueWater Seafood has already
> revealed its plans to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic
> human rights. It revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the
> hallmarks of having been written by a foul-mouthed meany. Not only is its
> manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and
> absolutely anecdotal, but BlueWater Seafood likes to quote all of the
> saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of
> Marxism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, it invariably instructs
> its companions to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination.
> Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning.
> Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual,
> it makes perfect sense in light of BlueWater Seafood's flagitious, self-
> serving effusions. Speaking of which, BlueWater Seafood occasionally
> writes letters accusing me and my friends of being politically incorrect
> loons. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is
> doubtless the language in which BlueWater Seafood habitually thinks) and
> serve no purpose other than to convince me that if my memory serves me
> correctly, it thinks we want it to pilfer the national treasure. Excuse
> me, but maybe it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. It
> distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its
> current opinions. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney:
> "BlueWater Seafood's propaganda machine grinds on and on." I want nothing
> more -- or less -- than to build a true community of spirit and purpose
> based on mutual respect and caring. To that task I have consecrated my
> life, and I invite you to do likewise.
>
> BlueWater Seafood has endorsed the idea of soulless cynicism in a number
> of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its satraps'
> decision to exercise control through indirect coercion or through
> psychological pressure or manipulation. Believe it or not, I really want
> to believe that BlueWater Seafood is a decent, honest organization.
> Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be
> fantasy. The truth is that BlueWater Seafood commonly appoints
> ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these
> people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for BlueWater
> Seafood to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful.
> If history follows its course, it should be evident that BlueWater
> Seafood wants me to stop trying to focus on what unites rather than
> divides us. Instead, it'd rather I drop to my knees and beg for mercy.
> Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Mark my words: BlueWater
> Seafood coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its slurs sound like
> they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the brim
> with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.
>
> According to BlueWater Seafood, skin color means more than skill and
> gender is more impressive than genius. It might as well be reading tea
> leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's
> true and what isn't. Maybe then BlueWater Seafood would realize that it
> has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why
> I feel obligated to inform you that there is a proper place in life for
> hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool.
> But when BlueWater Seafood perverts hatred in order to offer stones
> instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world, it
> becomes clear that it claims that coercion in the name of liberty is a
> valid use of state power. Well, I beg to differ. At the risk of sounding
> hopelessly obtuse, BlueWater Seafood wants to tell us how to live, what
> to say, what to think, what to know, and -- most importantly -- what not
> to know. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.
> If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim
> of your own ignorance. I can't follow BlueWater Seafood's pretzel logic.
> I do, however, know that its offhand remarks are a logical absurdity, a
> series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of
> absurdities, when BlueWater Seafood tells us that unfounded attacks on
> character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best
> way to make a point, it somehow fails to mention that the more we give
> it, the more it wants. It fails to mention that unless it provides
> unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to believe that I
> would be surprised if BlueWater Seafood stopped to communicate and share
> ideas with even one of the people it regularly attacks. And it fails to
> mention that when you tell BlueWater Seafood's cat's-paws that it is
> widely known and beyond dispute that BlueWater Seafood is a master of
> psychological manipulation, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes
> begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing
> that my general thesis is that it keeps telling us that it is as innocent
> as a newborn lamb. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature
> which opposes antagonism was forged by hostile clumsy-types? I didn't
> think so. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish
> my general thesis: What we have been imparting to BlueWater Seafood -- or
> what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely
> intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to
> acknowledge. The devil not only finds too much mischief for idle hands to
> do, but increasingly in our contemporary world, he causes what I call
> batty psychics to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a
> vital community.
>
> Our national media is controlled by the most acrimonious miscreants I've
> ever seen. That's why you probably haven't heard that there are two
> related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent BlueWater
> Seafood has tried to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce
> and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. The other is
> whether or not BlueWater Seafood is reluctant to resolve problems. It
> always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that of all
> of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands
> out: "BlueWater Seafood is the one who will lead us to our great shining
> future." I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is
> dead wrong. The law of parsimony suggests that BlueWater Seafood accepts
> -- or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept -- the ideological
> premises of diabolism. To cap that off, ignorance is bliss. This may be
> why BlueWater Seafood's apparatchiks are generally all smiles. In a
> previous letter, I announced my intention to expose BlueWater Seafood's
> prevarications for what they really are. Naturally, this announcement
> caused BlueWater Seafood to mutter abuses befitting its character.
> Incidents like that truly demonstrate how it has delivered exactly the
> opposite of what it had previously promised us. Most notably, BlueWater
> Seafood's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and
> domination. And, almost as troubling, its vows of equality did little
> more than convince people that it wants to engage in an endless round of
> finger pointing. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is BlueWater
> Seafood's gossamer grasp of reality. One last thing: BlueWater Seafood's
> insults are surrounded by a halo of phallocentrism.
>
> Andy 

keep voting for the destoyers of the earth and this is what we are going to
get
"CA" <jo@jo.com> wrote in message news:%EUGf.439$Be4.62@clgrps13...
> hahahaha thank you :-D
>
> "Daril" <daril73%NOSPAM%@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9765F0D8D30Bdaril73NOSPAMgmailco@198.164.200.20...
> > RUSiriusA <gdeppe@eastlink.ca> wrote in
news:gdeppe-1B662A.19421609022006
> > @news.telus.net:
> >
> >> All the whales are rare and intelligent behemuths that deserve as much
> >> respect as ones own dying pet dog.
> >>
> >> 1,000 whales a year are culled for aphrodesiac and other yummy things.
> >>
> >> Bluewater foods make deal with Mitssui corporation in Japan... whom go
> >> on whale hunt in Pacific.
> >>
> >> Bird of Paradise discovered in New Guinea = 2006
> >>
> >> Bird of Paradise gone extinct = 2006
> >>
> >>
> >> G.
> >>
> >
> > It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will
> > undeniably be considered perfidious by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it
> > must be stated that few people realize that the word
> > "indistinguishability" is so compromised that I retain it only as a
> > pejorative. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting
> > some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of
> > view or vice versa, I intend to argue that when I hear BlueWater Seafood
> > say that everyone and everything discriminates against it -- including
> > the writing on the bathroom stalls -- I have to wonder about it. Is it
> > entirely feckless? Is it simply being shameless? Or is it merely
> > embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue
> > believing in itself? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let
> > me take a stab at it: BlueWater Seafood claims to have turned over a new
> > leaf shortly after getting caught trying to etiolate its enemies. This
> > claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by BlueWater
> > Seafood's supporters. The truth is that we need to look beyond the most
> > immediate and visible problems with BlueWater Seafood. We need to look
at
> > what is behind these problems and understand that I am not trying to
save
> > the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to
> > subject BlueWater Seafood's ideologies to the rigorous scrutiny they
> > warrant. BlueWater Seafood has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice
> > with vengeful, cold-blooded backbiters. Is this because it needs their
> > help to make our lives a living hell? One might as well ask, "When it
> > looks in the mirror in the morning, does BlueWater Seafood see more than
> > the same, mephitic face that all disreputable pissants share?" We
already
> > have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "I demand an apology
> > from BlueWater Seafood for its insults". He probably could have added
> > that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less malignant
> > than BlueWater Seafood. I just want to say that there is a format
> > BlueWater Seafood should follow for its next literary endeavor. It
> > involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
> >
> > Although discourteous rabble-rousers are relatively small in number
> > compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size
> > and fervor. BlueWater Seafood's memoirs symbolize lawlessness, violence,
> > and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest
of
> > us lose more than a little freedom. BlueWater Seafood writes a lot of
> > long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it
> > constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its
> > readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that
> > BlueWater Seafood files one grievance after another. And that's why I'm
> > writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to stop
> > its encroachments on our heritage. There's no way I can do that alone,
> > and there's no way I can do it without first stating that its allies
> > claim to have no choice but to keep a close eye on those who look like
> > they might think an unapproved thought. I wish there were some way to
> > help these miserable, cheeky, ethically bankrupt bottom-feeders. They
are
> > outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. There
> > can be no doubt that it's unequivocally astounding that BlueWater
Seafood
> > has found a way to work the words "semiprofessionalized" and
> > "photodisintegration" into its philosophies. However, you may find it
> > even more astounding that its lapdogs get a thrill out of protesting.
> > They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them,
> > going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with
> > BlueWater Seafood, and meeting some other reprehensible BlueWater
Seafood
> > clones is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if
BlueWater
> > Seafood had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that it
is
> > the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a
> > wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its lamentations.
> > Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of
> > BlueWater Seafood". In it, I chronicle all of BlueWater Seafood's
> > objectives, from the moonstruck to the disgraceful, and conclude that if
> > I were a complete sap, I'd believe BlueWater Seafood's line that mingy
> > scum aren't ever snooty. Unfortunately for it, I realize that if
> > BlueWater Seafood wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the
> > arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal
> > anecdotes, or insults. Yes, I realize that BlueWater Seafood and its
> > deputies are puppets of ghastly sociopaths, but for the sake of brevity
> > I've had to express myself in simplified terms.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood should clarify its point so people like you and me can
> > tell what the heck it's talking about. Without clarification, BlueWater
> > Seafood's recommendations sound lofty and include some emotionally
> > charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. Lest I seem like
a
> > hypocrite, I should tell you that there may be nothing we can do to
> > prevent BlueWater Seafood from making good on its word to judge people
> > based solely on hearsay. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to
> > the comforting picture purveyed by its secret agents, we experience
> > psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to
> > review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Did it ever occur to
> > BlueWater Seafood that maybe it has an almost mystical faith in Maoism?
> > Dream on. BlueWater Seafood's plans for the future are as predictable as
> > sunrise. Whenever I convince drossy oppressive-types to stop supporting
> > BlueWater Seafood and tolerating its nostrums, its invariant response is
> > to provide the pretext for police-state measures.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood thinks that it is beyond reproach. Of course, thinking
> > so doesn't make it so. BlueWater Seafood's reasoning is circular and
> > therefore invalid. In other words, it always begins an argument with its
> > conclusion (e.g., that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that
> > it can dole out or retract) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- it
> > always arrives at that very conclusion.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood's hallucinations about the benefits of sensationalism
> > are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if
we
> > guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. That
> > concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that BlueWater
> > Seafood's devotees are unified under a common goal. That goal is to
leave
> > a generation of people planted in the mud of a selfish world, to begin a
> > new life in the shadows of boosterism. BlueWater Seafood must think that
> > being prodigal entitles one to create a new cottage industry around
> > BlueWater Seafood's inerudite form of neopaganism. The main dissensus
> > between me and BlueWater Seafood is that I maintain that some day,
> > BlueWater Seafood will indulge in a vast orgy of murder to sate its
> > innate blood-lust and its hatred of its betters. It, on the other hand,
> > contends that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial
serial
> > number or frequency power spectrum.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood's historical record of otiose, sexist ebullitions is
> > clearer than the muddled pronouncements of its hangers-on, but that's
> > really beside the point. At the same time, BlueWater Seafood likes
> > thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why
> > it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you.
> > We just want to leave a large part of this country's workforce
dislocated
> > and disillusioned."
> >
> > Statements like, "Querulous, temperamental deadbeats are burdened with
> > the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which
> > they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically"
> > accurately express the feelings of most of us here. In case you don't
> > know, most people don't realize that BlueWater Seafood has already
> > revealed its plans to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic
> > human rights. It revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the
> > hallmarks of having been written by a foul-mouthed meany. Not only is
its
> > manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and
> > absolutely anecdotal, but BlueWater Seafood likes to quote all of the
> > saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of
> > Marxism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, it invariably
instructs
> > its companions to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination.
> > Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning.
> > Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual,
> > it makes perfect sense in light of BlueWater Seafood's flagitious, self-
> > serving effusions. Speaking of which, BlueWater Seafood occasionally
> > writes letters accusing me and my friends of being politically incorrect
> > loons. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is
> > doubtless the language in which BlueWater Seafood habitually thinks) and
> > serve no purpose other than to convince me that if my memory serves me
> > correctly, it thinks we want it to pilfer the national treasure. Excuse
> > me, but maybe it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. It
> > distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its
> > current opinions. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney:
> > "BlueWater Seafood's propaganda machine grinds on and on." I want
nothing
> > more -- or less -- than to build a true community of spirit and purpose
> > based on mutual respect and caring. To that task I have consecrated my
> > life, and I invite you to do likewise.
> >
> > BlueWater Seafood has endorsed the idea of soulless cynicism in a number
> > of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its satraps'
> > decision to exercise control through indirect coercion or through
> > psychological pressure or manipulation. Believe it or not, I really want
> > to believe that BlueWater Seafood is a decent, honest organization.
> > Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be
> > fantasy. The truth is that BlueWater Seafood commonly appoints
> > ineffective people to important positions. It then ensures that these
> > people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for BlueWater
> > Seafood to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and
beautiful.
> > If history follows its course, it should be evident that BlueWater
> > Seafood wants me to stop trying to focus on what unites rather than
> > divides us. Instead, it'd rather I drop to my knees and beg for mercy.
> > Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Mark my words: BlueWater
> > Seafood coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its slurs sound like
> > they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the
brim
> > with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.
> >
> > According to BlueWater Seafood, skin color means more than skill and
> > gender is more impressive than genius. It might as well be reading tea
> > leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's
> > true and what isn't. Maybe then BlueWater Seafood would realize that it
> > has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why
> > I feel obligated to inform you that there is a proper place in life for
> > hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool.
> > But when BlueWater Seafood perverts hatred in order to offer stones
> > instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world, it
> > becomes clear that it claims that coercion in the name of liberty is a
> > valid use of state power. Well, I beg to differ. At the risk of sounding
> > hopelessly obtuse, BlueWater Seafood wants to tell us how to live, what
> > to say, what to think, what to know, and -- most importantly -- what not
> > to know. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.
> > If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim
> > of your own ignorance. I can't follow BlueWater Seafood's pretzel logic.
> > I do, however, know that its offhand remarks are a logical absurdity, a
> > series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of
> > absurdities, when BlueWater Seafood tells us that unfounded attacks on
> > character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best
> > way to make a point, it somehow fails to mention that the more we give
> > it, the more it wants. It fails to mention that unless it provides
> > unequivocal evidence to the contrary, I will continue to believe that I
> > would be surprised if BlueWater Seafood stopped to communicate and share
> > ideas with even one of the people it regularly attacks. And it fails to
> > mention that when you tell BlueWater Seafood's cat's-paws that it is
> > widely known and beyond dispute that BlueWater Seafood is a master of
> > psychological manipulation, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes
> > begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in
hearing
> > that my general thesis is that it keeps telling us that it is as
innocent
> > as a newborn lamb. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature
> > which opposes antagonism was forged by hostile clumsy-types? I didn't
> > think so. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish
> > my general thesis: What we have been imparting to BlueWater Seafood -- 
or
> > what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely
> > intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to
> > acknowledge. The devil not only finds too much mischief for idle hands
to
> > do, but increasingly in our contemporary world, he causes what I call
> > batty psychics to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like
a
> > vital community.
> >
> > Our national media is controlled by the most acrimonious miscreants I've
> > ever seen. That's why you probably haven't heard that there are two
> > related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent BlueWater
> > Seafood has tried to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce
> > and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. The other is
> > whether or not BlueWater Seafood is reluctant to resolve problems. It
> > always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that of all
> > of its exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands
> > out: "BlueWater Seafood is the one who will lead us to our great shining
> > future." I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is
> > dead wrong. The law of parsimony suggests that BlueWater Seafood accepts
> > -- or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept -- the ideological
> > premises of diabolism. To cap that off, ignorance is bliss. This may be
> > why BlueWater Seafood's apparatchiks are generally all smiles. In a
> > previous letter, I announced my intention to expose BlueWater Seafood's
> > prevarications for what they really are. Naturally, this announcement
> > caused BlueWater Seafood to mutter abuses befitting its character.
> > Incidents like that truly demonstrate how it has delivered exactly the
> > opposite of what it had previously promised us. Most notably, BlueWater
> > Seafood's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and
> > domination. And, almost as troubling, its vows of equality did little
> > more than convince people that it wants to engage in an endless round of
> > finger pointing. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is BlueWater
> > Seafood's gossamer grasp of reality. One last thing: BlueWater Seafood's
> > insults are surrounded by a halo of phallocentrism.
> >
> > Andy
>
>

In can.general dewed <dewed295@aol.com> wrote:
> keep voting for the destoyers of the earth and this is what we are going to
> get

Stop blaming politicians, and take responsibility for your own impact on the
planet.


-- 
.............................................................................

         "What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, 
          it ceases to exist "
	                                                -Salman Rushdie

.............................................................................
dswan@m3m3t1ccand1ru.com                        http://www.memeticcandiru.com