Article View: misc.consumers
Article #9436Re: Should Md. Ban Cell phones in cars?
From: Snow
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:21
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:21
26 lines
2930 bytes
2930 bytes
"Scott in Aztlan" <qinencnyn@lnubb.pbz> wrote in message news:aq524vcmbbm83atv2app9akfn2auiqvku2@4ax.com... > The answer to the question in the subject line is YES. With a fine of > $500, maybe the revenue-hungry jurisdictions will switch from > enforcing the underposted speed limits to nailing the bimbos in their > SUVs chatting obliviously on their cell phones. Not only is there more > money in it for the municipality writing the ticket, but it actually > does something to improve road safety. I have seen more people driving around in high end sport cars and the ricer types using cell phones while driving then I have seen sue-vee drivers.. Even if it wasn't your intent, you just listed all sue-vee and 4x4 drivers as the group who does this most often.. I have even school bus drivers using their cell phone while doing their bus runs. It is not a problem that is caused by ones choice of vehicle, its a problem caused by bad drivers period, whether they drive a riced out civic, a $60,000 bmw, a family sedan or a sue-vee/4x4. Snow... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 2003-01-27
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<FKb0a.231557$ej1.41997@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!news03.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com!news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <aq524vcmbbm83atv2app9akfn2auiqvku2@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10774d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10774d,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: 11299e,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,53c72126a599145a X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-05 09:21:56 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!news03.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com!news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Reply-To: "Snow" <snowbalspam@rogers.com> From: "Snow" <snowbalspam@rogers.com> Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving,alt.cellular,md.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving References: <3E40C784.881CE850@nospam.com> <aq524vcmbbm83atv2app9akfn2auiqvku2@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Should Md. Ban Cell phones in cars? Lines: 28 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <FKb0a.231557$ej1.41997@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:21:41 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.157.235.184 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rogers.com X-Trace: news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com 1044465701 24.157.235.184 (Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:21:41 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:21:41 EST