🚀 go-pugleaf

"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wMFtb.31778$Hb3.11180@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> "joe" <joebird_11@netzero.com> wrote in message
> news:bp6qhi$13sp$1@news.wplus.net...
> > yes they could have done the raid in a private school too, had the
> principal
> > invited them in to do it ( as is the case in the S.C. school) the
> difference
> > is that in a private school the principal would have to answer to angery
> > parents.
>
> Don't public school principals have to answer to parents too? Or at least
to
> the school board, who the parents elected?

That is the classic reasoning of totalitarian socialism.  If the issue is
education, food, clothing, shelter, TV, widgets or any goods or services,
then a freedom advocate will point out how people provide for needs in a
free market economy, and the response of the classic totalitarian socialist
is that everything that people have in a free society can be provided by a
totalitarian government because "Don't government providers have to answer
to citizens too? Or at least to the provider board, who the citizens elect?"
It is frightening how commonplace that response has become and how the
people who provide that response to one subject (e.g. schools) NEVER OPENLY
expand the response as was done in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,
Communist China, the National Socialist German Workers Party, Cuba, etc.
It is as if the people who use that simplistic response do not know all the
horrible ideologies that have used that same response.   Very frightening.





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----