🚀 go-pugleaf

"rex" <rexy@ij.net> wrote in message news:3fb78737_6@corp.newsgroups.com...
> "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:wMFtb.31778$Hb3.11180@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> > "joe" <joebird_11@netzero.com> wrote in message
> > news:bp6qhi$13sp$1@news.wplus.net...
> > > yes they could have done the raid in a private school too, had the
> > principal
> > > invited them in to do it ( as is the case in the S.C. school) the
> > difference
> > > is that in a private school the principal would have to answer to
angery
> > > parents.
> >
> > Don't public school principals have to answer to parents too? Or at
least
> to
> > the school board, who the parents elected?
>
> That is the classic reasoning of totalitarian socialism.  If the issue is
> education, food, clothing, shelter, TV, widgets or any goods or services,
> then a freedom advocate will point out how people provide for needs in a
> free market economy, and the response of the classic totalitarian
socialist
> is that everything that people have in a free society can be provided by a
> totalitarian government because "Don't government providers have to answer
> to citizens too? Or at least to the provider board, who the citizens
elect?"
> It is frightening how commonplace that response has become and how the
> people who provide that response to one subject (e.g. schools) NEVER
OPENLY
> expand the response as was done in the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics,
> Communist China, the National Socialist German Workers Party, Cuba, etc.
> It is as if the people who use that simplistic response do not know all
the
> horrible ideologies that have used that same response.   Very frightening.

You proved nothing. School boards answer to citizens. Period. That's
democracy. In totalitarianism, no citizen has any say. Period.