Article View: mtl.general
Article #2283Re: Pour la destruction du Bloc Qu�b�cois !
From: Doug Cortens
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00
58 lines
3494 bytes
3494 bytes
Bosse Dominique wrote: > > Luc Richard <lranjou@login.net> writes: > > >Scott N. wrote: > > >> This is pure immature emotion talking. Separatism won't put food on the > >> table for your kids, it won't result in a promising future if Quebec > >> continues to have one of the highest unemployment rates in the G7 and > >> exists without social peace. And what is it with this National pride bit? > >> Tell me, what will it do for you? The inability of anyone to articulate > >> an intelligent case for a separate Quebec continues to be the only > >> constant is this mess. > > >Poor Scott ! > > >L`�TRE PR�C�DE L`AVOIR !!!! > > >Je sais qu`il est difficile pour un anglo-saxon de comprendre > >mais... prend ton temps, il faudra que tu prennes l`habitude > >car l`ind�pendance est in�vitable. > > >La relation de *bons voisins* devra prendre le dessus sur tes > >frustrations. Ne panique pas...Ton pays, le Canada, sera toujours retenu > >artificillement au G-7. �a fait l`affaire de l`oncle SAM > >d`avoir un *yes man* bien assis � cot� de lui. > > >Regards, > > What Luc is saying is that *being* is more > important than *having*. In Quebec, and > that seems hard for you to understand, > what we *are* is important to us. And > Canadians, we are not in our hearts and > souls. There is nothing you can do about > it, sovereignty is unavoidable. > > He also says something about Canada now > owing its seat in the G7 to the fact that > it is a sure ally for the US. > > Now my own: > > Recently -- and I think it was a Canadian > who suggested it -- I read about Canada > and Quebec being G7th A and G7th B. What > would you think (I said *think*, not > rant or bark or erupt or spew hatred) about > such a concept: a shared seat in the G7, > both of us sitting side by side saying > YES to whatever the US want? > > --NO! NO! No! It sounds so riduculous that only a seperatist could have thought of it! Quebec is not a country and should not be regonized as a country even if they get a little over 50% in an illegal referundum. Doug
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3221C772.30FC@concentric.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<321E0A37.15D@login.net> <01bb92e7$dd27e2e0$435965cc@Mediom.mediom.qc.ca> <3221002C.71D4@login.net> <322136A0.5D3D@together.net> <322119CB.F98@login.net> <bossed.841033966@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 101dc0,417a34bfbddb9178 X-Google-Attributes: gid101dc0,public X-Google-Thread: 114af9,417a34bfbddb9178 X-Google-Attributes: gid114af9,public X-Google-Thread: fe894,417a34bfbddb9178 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe894,public X-Google-Thread: 1085c1,417a34bfbddb9178 X-Google-Attributes: gid1085c1,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,417a34bfbddb9178 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public From: Doug Cortens <dcortens@concentric.net> Subject: Re: Pour la destruction du Bloc Qu�b�cois ! Date: 1996/08/26 Message-ID: <3221C772.30FC@concentric.net> X-Deja-AN: 176560881 references: <321E0A37.15D@login.net> <01bb92e7$dd27e2e0$435965cc@Mediom.mediom.qc.ca> <3221002C.71D4@login.net> <322136A0.5D3D@together.net> <322119CB.F98@login.net> <bossed.841033966@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA> content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 organization: Concentric Internet Services mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: mtl.general,soc.culture.quebec,can.francais,qc.politique,can.politics x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I)