Article View: ne.singles
Article #209Re: Guys Who Describe Themselves As "Woman's Rights Champions"
From: Marguerite Petersen
Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 00:00
119 lines
7329 bytes
7329 bytes
In article <31A08DA8.536B@blizzard.gaffaneys.com>,
Tony Bruno <tbruno@blizzard.gaffaneys.com> wrote:
>PangK wrote:
>>
>> Does the name BOBBY PACKWOOD mean anything to you?
>> Working for THAT champion of women's rights meant he had to
>> feel your tits daily! Or women's rights advocate Teddy Kennedy who
>> rapes witresses in resturants under the table.... THAT is what I mean.
>> I've seen LOTS of these men. ALL of them I have met want ONE THING
>> PUSSY! Which is why they hang around women saying ANYTHING the girls want
>> to hear! The saddest part is that IT WORKS!
>
>
>To deny that men like this exist would be foolish. Conversely, to
>declare that *no* man that believes in Women's Rights is expressing a
>genuine concern and is only after the proverbial "one thing" is both
>ignorant and dangerous.
I agree completely! My husband has *always* believed in WOmen's Rights,
long before I met him and for the past 30 years as well. His record
shows a definite interest in promoting women in the academic world
for their *skills* and experience and NOT their skirt length or bust
size.
>Case in point: My wife has most of the requirements called for by big
>business to make it in corporate America. She's relatively young (29),
>attractive, has ten years work experience, including time as a
>supervisor in a goverment facility, has held a national security
>clearance (without being an armed services veteran, mind you), and has
>even been a partner in a desktop publishing firm. She holds a BA in
>English, which she acknowledges is not as "sexy" as a BS in Computer
>Science, but she makes up for that fact by being extremely computer
>literate. She currently holds the position as a Senior Computer
>Consultant at a corporate supplier in Grand Forks, ND. This makes her
>succesful, right?
>
>Hardly.
I knew you were going to say that. Why? Because it has been MY
experience as well.
>When my wife graduated from college in 1993, we decided to chance a move
>to the Denver Metro area in order to improve our long-term economic
>position. It was a tough decision; I opted to hold off on my last year
>of college in order to make the move, as my wife was literally being
>offered only retail jobs in Grand Forks. We did the headhunter thing,
>and -- unlike a surprising number of our peers -- hit the bricks to make
>opportunities for ourselves. After three months of hard searching, the
>*only* offer she got (after the only interview she received, mind you)
>was that of a receptionist at an electronic components supply company.
>She was placed in charge of the computer equipment, handled phones, and
>made a whopping $8.50/hour to start. Eventually, she made $9.60/hour,
>but was passed over for promotions twice in favor of people with half
>the experience and education and, apparently, half the material to make
>their skirts. She looked for other positions, but they never panned
>out. She was either overqualified, underqualified, or simply "not what
>we're looking for."
Not that I'm complaining (I'm really not), BUT the fact that women
with MUCH more education and skills than I have (I do secretarial
work), are being hired in secretarial jobs, makes it not only *nasty*
for those like your wife, but also extremely difficult for those like
myself. (And by the way, I too have heard the "overqualified" bit.)
>What does this have to do with Women's Rights? Well, while my wife was
>slogging away, I was looking for a job to "help pay the bills" before I
>went back to school. I figured that, without a college degree, I would
>be offered garbage, so I was prepared for the worst. Instead, I
>interviewed to the final level for two jobs making in excess of
>$35,000.00/year, turned down two $10.00/hour positions, and finally
>chose a position with a firm several blocks away from my wife, simply
>because I only intended to stay there for a year before college. While
>I was at this firm, it was made clear to me by my co-workers that, if I
>did not have a wife and family, I would likely go quite far. Disgusted
>by the whole experience, my wife and I decided to move back to North
>Dakota so I could finish my degree. She found her current position
>immediately, rose quickly to Senior Consultant, but that is where she
>will stay, as there is no more room for advancement, and there is no
>economic opportunity in this part of the country.
>
>I tell this story because we were both stunned by the entire experience.
> I was raised by three older sisters, so the concept of treating women
>as anything other than competent human beings was (and is) beyond me.
>While I was in the military, my wife was treated with nothing short of
>the respect that should be expected by anyone. Instead, we found the
>Denver Metro area to be, by and large, a "Penis-Only" club, with the
>women that were making it catering to the market by dressing
>ridiculously. (Thigh-high slit skirts in a business meeting? Please.)
>Sexism, we discovered, does exist, and does not appear to be going away.
Yes, sexism (and ageism, by the way) DOES indeed exist. I like to
believe that in scattered places it IS going away, albeit very slowly.
Those such as yourself who have *personal* experience (as do I) with
this sort of thing, are at least aware of it.
> It horrifies me, it disgusts me, and it makes me shudder at the state
>of humanity. I am not after the "one thing" that the previous poster
>implied, and do not tolerate any such treatment in my presence. In the
>year we have to seek out better economic opportunities I can only hope
>that we will find a location that offers interviews based on
>skills and not bust-size. We're both tired of a business environment
>where the chances of my wife being hired are directly proportionaly to
>how high her skirt is.
>
>Tony Bruno
I hope for you and your wife's sake that you are both able to find
work in a location that is acceptable. (By the way, I refuse to
wear skirts.)
Marg
--
Member PSEB Official Sonneteer JLP SoL
Charter Member WISE WOMEN OF THE WEB
petersm@peak.org http://www.orst.edu/~peterseb/marg.html
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4nqmp6$e89@PEAK.ORG>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4nlph9$gom@ccnet3.ccnet.com> <4nm91k$qaa@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <31A08DA8.536B@blizzard.gaffaneys.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110235,c64c2eda714a618d X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,c64c2eda714a618d X-Google-Attributes: gid106b5d,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c64c2eda714a618d X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,c64c2eda714a618d X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c64c2eda714a618d X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,c64c2eda714a618d X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public From: petersm@PEAK.ORG (Marguerite Petersen) Subject: Re: Guys Who Describe Themselves As "Woman's Rights Champions" Date: 1996/05/20 Message-ID: <4nqmp6$e89@PEAK.ORG> X-Deja-AN: 155881174 references: <4nlph9$gom@ccnet3.ccnet.com> <4nm91k$qaa@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <31A08DA8.536B@blizzard.gaffaneys.com> organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples,rec.org.mensa