🚀 go-pugleaf

Well said.  I applaud your speaking out what I'm sure echoes the
feelings of
many silent followers in this newsgroup.

Scott

susan@pop.service.ohio-state.edu wrote in message ...
>> Garrett,
>>
>>     Ever read up on the constitution or writings of Jefferson, Paine,

>> Mason, Madison, Washington, Franklin and on and on?  Do so.  It will
>> open your eyes to the purpose of founding a nation and writing a
>> constitution.  Dissent, even LOUD dissent, is protected speech.  The
>> most foul and disagreeable speech is the speech that deserves the
most
>> protection and guarantees.  Even the Supreme Court has said so many
>> times.
>
>(Note: Text below was formatted for easier reading. No words were
edited.)
>
>>U.S. SUPREME COURT:
>>"Regulations which permit the Government to discriminate on the basis
of
>>the content of the message cannot be tolerated under the First
Amendment."
>>
>>"[T]he fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient

>>reason for suppressing it. Indeed, if it is the speaker's opinion that

>>gives offense, that consequence is a reason for according it
>>constitutional protection."
>
>>"If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is

>>that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply
>>because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable."
>>
>> Excerpts from the Opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court
>>
>>                                      <<<<profanity snipped>>>>
>>                       Excerpt from 'Angsto, the man and the myth'
>>
>>  Any public figure can and must be held up to ridicule and abuse,
>
>So we can do the same to you by that interpretation.
>Where did you ever learn that they "must be held up to ridicule and
abuse"?
>Certainly not from your Supreme Court quote. It only refers to the
right to
>speak an idea/opinion even though it is "offensive or disagreeable".
>
>The disagreeement wasn't the problem, the presentation was. Those
yelling
>over the speakers were not letting the government the right of speaking

>THEIR opinion even though the yelling few found it "offensive or
>disagreeable". It's a two way street.
>
>> especially those pinheads who attempt to sway public opinion
>
>Like those yelling their voices over all in the field house?
>
>> with shady deals and pictures of dead women and children!
>
>Saddam's the one who used the poison on his own people.
>
>
>> As for old Saddam's propaganda machine, what planet do you live on?
>
>Third rock from the sun...need a vector to get back here?
>
>>Saddam doesn't need one nor does he have one.
>
>And your expertise and expert sources in the region tell you this?
>Puhleeze! Tell me another fairy tale!
>
>> Puhleeze!  Our fearless leaders do quite well blowing it out their
>> a**es all by themselves without the help of some imaginary middle
>> eastern disinformation network.
>
>Which network would that be?
>
>> Who needs disinformation?
>
>You seem to thrive on it!
>
>> One only needs to subscribe to someone like Iwaynet's newsfeeds.
>> They suck so bad I didn't get this note there butthrough Dejanews!
>> Real information is lost through poor technology and negligence.
>
>Well if Iwaynet is not meeting your standards why don't you find an ISP

>that will...if that's possible.
>No one's chained you to Iwaynet (Have they?).
>
>>I have a grasp of the nature of the constitution and its bill of
rights.
>
>Only as they seemingly apply to your desires. Get a grasp on the HUMAN
>side of the bill of rights and you'll find that there must be a give
and
>take to survive and just because one can yell louder doesn't make
him/her
>right.
>
>> Read them and weep.
>
>I read your posts and weep for you and the venom that you speak.
>
>> Angsto

I find this kind of thing amazing.  Meek individuals, admittedly
"lurking yet not speaking" suddenly becoming so aroused by the written
word of another they must respond.  They not only respond, they respond
to each and every line and statement with a simplistic, childish aside
that shows only a grade school concept of the constitution and real
debate.  Screw you.  Snipping naughty words and telling others they
should "love it or leave it" is pinheaded at its ignorant best.  These
people are the perfect dupes of the politicians, blindly following any
crap fed to them and buying into the fascist propaganda. Scott and Susan
should get together and start a threatening letter writing campaign to
stamp out dissent and make the world, Cowlumbus and Ohio State safe for
milktoast thought.  Guess what kiddies?  Angsto has accomplished his
mission, namely to get nervous nellies like you to stop being another
"brick in the wall" and actually DO SOMETHING, even if its just to toss
off your little backbiting nonsense. Waaah, waaaah, waaaaaaaaaaah!
Crybabies.  You and yours have created the kind of society we live in
today, one where it is immoral to have sex or look at it, and moral to
bomb babies and claim to be proud of it.  Sick fuckers.
Angsto
http://www.iwaynet.net/~angsto/angsto2.htm
Angsto returns to TV on Sunday, 3/15 & 3/22 and Wed. 3/18 & 3/25 at
11:30 pm on Channel 21, the freak channel in central Ohio.  Soon to air,
the Angsto takes Manhattan episode where a Penns. politician blows his
brains out to the 1812 overture!