Article View: ott.rec.sailing
Article #29Re: CCG's Boat Operator Card
From: Brad Taylor
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:22
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:22
183 lines
7605 bytes
7605 bytes
"Bret Johnston" <bretj@island.net> wrote in message news:a6pccv02b2l@enews1.newsguy.com... > Stupid ill thought out legislation is exactly what it is. The operator card > does not test a boater at the helm unlike a drivers road test that says ok > ya read the book now lets drive the car and prove you know your stuff. > Until you test at the helm you really don't know that the operator > understands that the pointy end in most case goes first. What this in > reality is a government bureacrates knee jerk reaction to a climbing > accident statistic of PWC accidents and in typical Ottawa puzzle palace > style paints with a broad brush to protect their collective asses... > > Bret > > > "Charles T. Low" <ctlow@boatdocking.com> wrote in message > news:2knj8.335$8X4.89878558@news.ripnet.com... > > Bret, > > > > You make a few common but serious logical errors (IMHO). > > > > 1/ "the common sence equation. Ya just can't teach that... " I strongly > > disagree (see below). > > > > 2/ You yourself claim to be a careful, responsible boater (and firearms > > user), with or without regulation, so therefore regulation is not > required. > > But your conclusion does not follow from your (self-)observation. > > > > 3/ "The Boat Operator Card does not a competent boat operator make..." You > > make it sound like an all-or-nothing proposition. You know that it's not. > > The question should be, does licencing raise the overall level of safety > in > > the population, sufficient to justify the time, expense and energy? > > > > My sense is that the world is divided into three categories. One does not > > need instruction, one will not heed instruction, but the third we can lead > > to instruction. I think that the latter category that comprises the > > majority. I suspect that a lot of people learn a lot of things from > > mandatory training, although of course they don't become experts from one > > introductory course. That's not the point. They bump their level of > > knowledge and skill up a notch or two, and often come away with the > > realization of how much they don't know that didn't used to know they > didn't > > know. That could be an important safety feature all in itself. > > > > I don't have data for this, but apparently there _is_ good data for car > > drivers' licences, for example - training helps, even when mandated. (Not > > everybody, not all the time - does not in any way negate the stats). > > > > I think that what many anti-regulators really mean is that they find > > regulation inconvenient, and that if only everybody else were like them it > > would be unnecessary. But i) it's inconvenient - we all simply have to get > > over it - and ii) everybody else isn't like you - we all have to accept > > that. By your description, you're in category 1 - a minority. We don't > > design systems for the minority. It's always nice if regulators > accommodate > > such a minority by allowing it to write the exam without taking the > course - > > as one can for the Boat Operator's Card! > > > > Charles > > > > ==== > > > > Charles T. Low > > ctlow@boatdocking.com > > www.boatdocking.com/ > > www.ctlow.ca/ > > > > ==== > > > > "Bret Johnston" <bretj@island.net> wrote in message > > news:a6kaf90251a@enews4.newsguy.com... > > > Ah yes the common sence equation. Ya just can't teach that... It's > almost > > > like the Fire Arms regulations, I have a FAC, I took the course and as > > > before the course I'm still just as carefull as I always was (and for > the > > > snippers that's damn carefull, including 28 years military experiance > with > > > the odd firearm). They regulate the shit out of me but that still > doesn't > > > stop the illegal sale of restricted weapons and the nut cases, but what > > the > > > hell I'm regulated. > > > > > > The Boat Operator Card does not a competent boat operator make. That > > comes > > > with common sense and experiance, even the bureocrates in the ivory > towers > > > should be able to understand that one. I carry a compass, a GPS, a VHF, > a > > > sounder, an auxillary moter, flares, fire extinguisher etc. etc. etc. > not > > > because I'm regulated because it's stupid not to. I don't go out in bad > > > weather, I come in if the weather is worsening, I keep my boat well > > serviced > > > and have a spare everything. > > > > > > This is like the fire arms thing, one nut case goes into a college and > > kills > > > a bunch of women, yes indeed an awfull thing but now I'm regulated to > > death. > > > Somebody invents the Personnel Water Craft places the village idot at > the > > > controls and once again I get regulated. > > > > > > End Rant > > > > > > Bret > > > > > > > > > "AK" <adam.kennedy@rogers.com> wrote in message > > > news:3c8baaee.1612988919@66.185.95.104... > > > > I understand what you are saying - but why would a seasoned mariner > > > > take a full day course when he could likely teach it? > > > > > > > > I challenged the test at the boat show and passed. Did the same thing > > > > for the Firearms Aquisition Certificate a few years back. > > > > > > > > Sure - a lot of it is common sense - then again a lot of accidents > > > > could be avoided if people excercised that. > > > > > > > > AK. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 08 Mar 2002 23:03:06 GMT, "Stinky_Cat" <me@here.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >X-No-archive: Yes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >What's the deal with the CCG's Boat Operator Card? > > > > >They to claim to want to improve water safety by forcing people to > take > > a > > > > >course and then pass a written exam. > > > > > > > > > >I was at the boat show two weeks back and there was an outfit there > > that > > > was > > > > >promoting themselves by telling people to try the exam and if you did > > not > > > > >pass, you did not pay. It was $40.00 if you passed. > > > > > > > > > >I'm sure you can see what's going on here. > > > > > > > > > >I saw young children, and others, passing this test and I know for a > > fact > > > > >they did not pass. > > > > > > > > > >Of course they are going to pass everyone... at $40.00 a head, how > can > > > they > > > > >not... this is easy money. What a racket! > > > > >It does not seem to be regulated at all. > > > > > > > > > >By the way.. I passed. :) > > > > > > > > > >SC/* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u91ch1rtmmau79@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<Kqbi8.4016$f5.171550@news> <3c8baaee.1612988919@66.185.95.104> <a6kaf90251a@enews4.newsguy.com> <2knj8.335$8X4.89878558@news.ripnet.com> <a6pccv02b2l@enews1.newsguy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc1cc,5fc312dada668357 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc1cc,public X-Google-Thread: 11428d,975d953a1546a2ef X-Google-Attributes: gid11428d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-14 06:22:28 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Brad Taylor" <b_taylor@look.ca> Newsgroups: ott.rec.sailing,can.rec.boating Subject: Re: CCG's Boat Operator Card Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:22:15 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <u91ch1rtmmau79@corp.supernews.com> Reply-To: "Brad Taylor" <b_taylor@nocrap.look.ca> References: <Kqbi8.4016$f5.171550@news> <3c8baaee.1612988919@66.185.95.104> <a6kaf90251a@enews4.newsguy.com> <2knj8.335$8X4.89878558@news.ripnet.com> <a6pccv02b2l@enews1.newsguy.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 185