🚀 go-pugleaf

Gee, and I thought you were going to tell us you could find anyone a nice 
turkey. 

In article <48i7mt$mcv@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,
   friend4u@ix.netcom.com (fm ) wrote:
>Welcome! 

FUCK you.  AND your mother.

>As you all know, thanksgiving is here!!!

So WHAT?  Does that mean you can SPAM groups at will?

I DONT FUCKING *THINK* SO!!!

>Friend Finder [ie: money grabber], the world's best CONFIDENTIAL
>[bullshit artist and] introduction service especially designed [to
>PISS OFF] adults 18+ wishes all members of our organization among you,
>and all of you, a happy thanksgiving, and the best of luck in the coming
>new year.

GO FUCK YOURSELF.

[ad snipped]
>Our name says it all [fucking assholes who only care about the bottom line!]
>Merry Xmas in advance

And your mother blows dogs.  Swallows after, and says 'mmmm'.

GET A FUCKING CLUE!

Asshole.

followups SET.

Newgroups NOT trimmed so that 'clue dispersion' has maximum effect on other
YAHOOS *thinking of doing the same*.

Copy forwarded to root@netcom.com, and its wholeheartedly suggested EACH AND
EVERY ONE of us who is SUBJECTED to this absolute, utter SHIT do the same.

Till the fucking server *CRASHES*.

I'm sick of NETCOM allowing these ASSININE bullshit artists get away with
spam after spam after fucking spam.

DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, you *shits*!

Is it beyond your fucking abilities to CLUE IN your NEW USERS?  Or dont you
GIVE A SHIT about things on the net?  Are you merely out to earn $$$???

DO SOMETHING.

Fucking *dicks*.

In article <48kasu$l30_001@news.intsyson.com>,
Rich Bland <rcb@intsyson.com> wrote:
[.. a mild condemnation ..]

I think I can detect some repressed anger there.
-- 
--
kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge

In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.951118074137.6292D-100000@crl14.crl.com>,
   Phyllis Shepard <pshepard@crl14.crl.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Rich Bland spewed, not wrote:
>> In article <48i7mt$mcv@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,
>>    friend4u@ix.netcom.com (fm ) wrote:
>> >Welcome! 
>[absolutely disgusting nasty trash deleted, or most of it]
>Actually, being polite to netcom.com gets you much further.  At
>least they will either tell the user to delete the posts or they
>will take away their accounts.

Yeah but thats retroactive, they need to take a *proactive* stance,
and let their _new_ accounts know _up front_ what is and isnt acceptable
behaviour.  They gotta tell them that sending an ad to *.singles, or
*.personals, or *.anything, for that matter, is a big time no-no, and
shouldnt be done!  Makes the user AND the provider look bad.

However, I did go overboard.  I admit it.  I accept full responsibility
for it.  I made MYSELF look bad, in the extreme.  Nothing I can do about
it now, the send button has been pushed.  So flame me in mail, lets not
continue the thread.  Unlike others, MY return address is real.  Use it
to vent, and lets move on.

The mailed reply *I* sent to the user is undeliverable, so, it would seem
that was a forgery, also.  Sorry Netcom, I jumped the gun in blaming you in
this instance.

>I know, I've instigated a few of these in another ng where the spamming
>and the forging go on forever.  There are ISPs who don't give a shit 
>(vivanet.com and portal.com to name two) and will never do anything about
>spamming or forging posts.  Portal.com users will forge netcom.com headers
>so be careful who you're talking to.  
>
>And, if you get no response from a provider, send a copy of the
>post and their response, if sent, to alt.current-events.net-abuse
>and tell the folks there about the provider.
>
>These suggestions will not get *your* account taken away and will
>help your blood pressure too, Rich.  Wash your mouth out, willya?

Folks, theres a lesson here.  My extreme apologies for going overboard,
I've had a hard week, and had an **exceptionally** ugly evening the
details of which are not important.  Lets just say the lesson is,
sometimes its best to just go straight to bed...

That spam was the last straw, and I lost it, big time.

[gargling with Lysol]

On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Rich Bland wrote:

> In article <48i7mt$mcv@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,
>    friend4u@ix.netcom.com (fm ) wrote:
> >Welcome! 
> 
[absolutely disgusting nasty trash deleted, or most of it]

> Copy forwarded to root@netcom.com, and its wholeheartedly suggested EACH AND
> EVERY ONE of us who is SUBJECTED to this absolute, utter SHIT do the same.
> 
> Till the fucking server *CRASHES*.
> 
> I'm sick of NETCOM allowing these ASSININE bullshit artists get away with
> spam after spam after fucking spam.
> 
> DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, you *shits*!
> 
Actually, being polite to netcom.com gets you much further.  At
least they will either tell the user to delete the posts or they
will take away their accounts.  I know, I've instigated a few of
these in another ng where the spamming and the forging go on 
forever.  There are ISPs who don't give a shit (vivanet.com and
portal.com to name two) and will never do anything about spamming
or forging posts.  Portal.com users will forge netcom.com headers
so be careful who you're talking to.  

And, if you get no response from a provider, send a copy of the
post and their response, if sent, to alt.current-events.net-abuse
and tell the folks there about the provider.

These suggestions will not get *your* account taken away and will
help your blood pressure too, Rich.  Wash your mouth out, willya?

P.

On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Phyllis Shepard wrote:

> > Till the fucking server *CRASHES*.
> > 
> And, if you get no response from a provider, send a copy of the
> post and their response, if sent, to alt.current-events.net-abuse
> and tell the folks there about the provider.
> 
Correction:  send to news.admin.net-abuse.misc, which supercedes
the alt group, I'm told.  If corrected by the provider, they will
post in news.admin.net-abuse.announce.

BTW, Linnea at abuse@netcom.com is a very nice admin and does take
care of abuse when she's able to.

P.

I have one word for you rich, decaf. Relax, seems to me that anyone can 
post anything, at least right now, before Big Brother figures out a way 
to watch everything. I have seen many things on the net that really 
shouldn't be a mere net search away. It seems to me if you are going to 
become so enraged, it should be sparked by something more offensive or 
controversial than some turkey hooker message. By the way what exactly 
does SPAM stand for?

In article <48s29q$t5q@mark.ucdavis.edu>,
Noreen Mastascusa <sznoreen@dale.ucdavis.edu> wrote:

I cant really handle the vocal range required for this one.

>Ken Smith, are you up for another duet?  I'll begin:
>
>Spam, spam, spam, spam,
>Spam, spam, spam, spam,
>Lovely spam, wonderful spam...

Spam, Spam, Spam
Spa------m, Spa------m, Spa------m

Lovely Spam

-- 
--
kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge

In <490q58$aif@hustle.rahul.net>, Ken Smith <kensmith@rahul.net> writes:
>In article <48s29q$t5q@mark.ucdavis.edu>,
>Noreen Mastascusa <sznoreen@dale.ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>
>I cant really handle the vocal range required for this one.
>
>>Ken Smith, are you up for another duet?  I'll begin:
>>
>>Spam, spam, spam, spam,
>>Spam, spam, spam, spam,
>>Lovely spam, wonderful spam...
>
>Spam, Spam, Spam
>Spa------m, Spa------m, Spa------m
>
>Lovely Spam
>
>-- 
>--
>kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge
I see you guys are spamming it up again!!!