🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: rec.games.design
3 messages
3 total messages Started by Steven Eric Schwartz Mon, 21 Dec 1992 07:38
FUDGE: Levels
#480
Author: Steven Eric Schwartz
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 07:38
13 lines
1169 bytes
A suggestion (even though I am a little late coming into this project) for 
level progressions: 

To make it easier on character sheets when abbreviating levels to a single
character, the 'Great' level could be changed to another word (off the top
of my head I'd use 'Excellent') to avoid confusing it with the 'Good' level.


-- 
Steven Eric Schwartz            "It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with
(schwarts@cps.msu.edu)           treasures to satiate desires both subtle and
125 East Wilson Hall, MSU        gross.  But it's not for the timid."
East Lansing, Michigan  48825                           - Q, "Q Who"
Re: FUDGE: Levels
#482
Author: Steffan O'Sullivan
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:13
27 lines
1573 bytes
schwarts@cps.msu.edu (Steven Eric Schwartz) writes:
>A suggestion (even though I am a little late coming into this project) for 
>level progressions: 

Lateness doesn't matter - welcome!

>To make it easier on character sheets when abbreviating levels to a single
>character, the 'Great' level could be changed to another word (off the top
>of my head I'd use 'Excellent') to avoid confusing it with the 'Good' level.

In this case, though, I must admit we hashed it out quite a bit.  The
upshot is:

No two net.people can agree on seven adjectives that form a progression
for the worst to the best.  Some have to be rejected because of other
connotations (such as Average - a Good swordsman gets a Good result on
the average, for example . . .).  Since no one can agree, I just chose
the seven that made the most sense to me and added a caveat that the GM
should change them as needed.  Your example wouldn't help me at all,
for instance:  I can easily see a difference between Good and Great,
but would have a hard time telling the difference between Excellent and
Superb . . .

But thanks for the feedback - always welcome!

-- 
  - Steffan O'Sullivan		         sos@oz.plymouth.edu
Re: FUDGE: Levels
#484
Author: Steven Eric Schwartz
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:07
28 lines
2115 bytes
In article <1992Dec21.141332.7260@oz.plymouth.edu> sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan) writes:

>>To make it easier on character sheets when abbreviating levels to a single
>>character, the 'Great' level could be changed to another word (off the top
>>of my head I'd use 'Excellent') to avoid confusing it with the 'Good' level.
>
>In this case, though, I must admit we hashed it out quite a bit.  The
>upshot is:
>
>No two net.people can agree on seven adjectives that form a progression
>for the worst to the best.  Some have to be rejected because of other
>connotations (such as Average - a Good swordsman gets a Good result on
>the average, for example . . .).  Since no one can agree, I just chose
>the seven that made the most sense to me and added a caveat that the GM
>should change them as needed.  Your example wouldn't help me at all,
>for instance:  I can easily see a difference between Good and Great,
>but would have a hard time telling the difference between Excellent and
>Superb . . .

I thought of that confusion on Ex...Su as well....ok back to eating more
FUDGE!


-- 
Steven Eric Schwartz            "It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with
(schwarts@cps.msu.edu)           treasures to satiate desires both subtle and
125 East Wilson Hall, MSU        gross.  But it's not for the timid."
East Lansing, Michigan  48825                           - Q, "Q Who"
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads