Thread View: rec.games.design
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Steven Eric Schwartz
Mon, 21 Dec 1992 07:38
FUDGE: Levels
Author: Steven Eric Schwartz
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 07:38
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 07:38
13 lines
1169 bytes
1169 bytes
A suggestion (even though I am a little late coming into this project) for level progressions: To make it easier on character sheets when abbreviating levels to a single character, the 'Great' level could be changed to another word (off the top of my head I'd use 'Excellent') to avoid confusing it with the 'Good' level. -- Steven Eric Schwartz "It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with (schwarts@cps.msu.edu) treasures to satiate desires both subtle and 125 East Wilson Hall, MSU gross. But it's not for the timid." East Lansing, Michigan 48825 - Q, "Q Who"
Re: FUDGE: Levels
Author: Steffan O'Sullivan
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:13
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:13
27 lines
1573 bytes
1573 bytes
schwarts@cps.msu.edu (Steven Eric Schwartz) writes: >A suggestion (even though I am a little late coming into this project) for >level progressions: Lateness doesn't matter - welcome! >To make it easier on character sheets when abbreviating levels to a single >character, the 'Great' level could be changed to another word (off the top >of my head I'd use 'Excellent') to avoid confusing it with the 'Good' level. In this case, though, I must admit we hashed it out quite a bit. The upshot is: No two net.people can agree on seven adjectives that form a progression for the worst to the best. Some have to be rejected because of other connotations (such as Average - a Good swordsman gets a Good result on the average, for example . . .). Since no one can agree, I just chose the seven that made the most sense to me and added a caveat that the GM should change them as needed. Your example wouldn't help me at all, for instance: I can easily see a difference between Good and Great, but would have a hard time telling the difference between Excellent and Superb . . . But thanks for the feedback - always welcome! -- - Steffan O'Sullivan sos@oz.plymouth.edu
Re: FUDGE: Levels
Author: Steven Eric Schwartz
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:07
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:07
28 lines
2115 bytes
2115 bytes
In article <1992Dec21.141332.7260@oz.plymouth.edu> sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan) writes: >>To make it easier on character sheets when abbreviating levels to a single >>character, the 'Great' level could be changed to another word (off the top >>of my head I'd use 'Excellent') to avoid confusing it with the 'Good' level. > >In this case, though, I must admit we hashed it out quite a bit. The >upshot is: > >No two net.people can agree on seven adjectives that form a progression >for the worst to the best. Some have to be rejected because of other >connotations (such as Average - a Good swordsman gets a Good result on >the average, for example . . .). Since no one can agree, I just chose >the seven that made the most sense to me and added a caveat that the GM >should change them as needed. Your example wouldn't help me at all, >for instance: I can easily see a difference between Good and Great, >but would have a hard time telling the difference between Excellent and >Superb . . . I thought of that confusion on Ex...Su as well....ok back to eating more FUDGE! -- Steven Eric Schwartz "It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with (schwarts@cps.msu.edu) treasures to satiate desires both subtle and 125 East Wilson Hall, MSU gross. But it's not for the timid." East Lansing, Michigan 48825 - Q, "Q Who"
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads