🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #838

Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps?

#838
From: Dennis
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:42
50 lines
3552 bytes
"Shaun" <not.today@go.away.au> wrote in message 
news:4a68395a$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Robert Baer" <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in message 
> news:ttqdnac-5O96jPXXnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@posted.localnet...
>> David L. Jones wrote:
>>> An interesting question was posted on another forum:
>>> "can you get (ceramic) SMD caps (1206,0805 etc) with the values printed 
>>> on them?".
>>>
>>> My first response was that I've very rarely seen this (like maybe once), 
>>> and while it is possible (see 
>>> http://www.synrad.com/search_apps/application_briefs/117-2.htm), you 
>>> basically can't get labeled ones, they are almost always without 
>>> markings.
>>>
>>> It got me to thinking, why is it so?
>>> My guess would be that it's due to the surface finish (or lack thereof) 
>>> on ceramic capacitors, and/or the delicate nature of their multi-layer 
>>> construction means they could be more easily damaged or properties 
>>> altered by the process.
>>> As opposed to most SMD resistors that have a coating on them which would 
>>> allow for easy and accurate printing using various technologies.
>>>
>>> Any know the real reason(s) why ceramic SMD caps don't have markings?
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>   Ahh..the caps could likewise be coated (and AFAIK they .are. coated 
>> prior to potting for leaded versions).
>>   Then, given that coating, they could be marked like the resistors you 
>> mentioned.
>>   BUT..that was "never" done so it will not be done (gotta stay in that 
>> rut...).
>
> I doult very much any manufacter would coat SMD caps as it would increase 
> the height to capacitor sits above the board, increasing the mounted 
> inductance, a crital factor when designing high frequecny boards. 
> Manufactuers spend a lot of money trying to reduce this unwanted property.
>
> see http://www.avx.co.il/docs/techinfo/licadesign.pdf
> or 
> http://www.kemet.com/kemet/web/homepage/kfbk3.nsf/vaFeedbackFAQ/D1A54E16FEC61B058525721E006EF53C/$file/Sun%20Paper%20on%20ESL%20&%20ESR.pdf
> although these articles deal with via placement they discuss the need to 
> reduce the size of the loop that current flows in, a loop that would be 
> increased if a capacitor had an extra coating on it.
>
>

Coating or encapsulation? Coating could be insignificantly thin. 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4a683e83$0$9756$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail
References: <Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <ttqdnac-5O96jPXXnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@posted.localnet> <4a68395a$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a5a6238865,26f718ada9b9cff2
X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail
From: "Dennis" <dennis@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics
References: <Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <ttqdnac-5O96jPXXnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@posted.localnet> <4a68395a$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps?
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:42:20 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090722-0, 22/07/2009), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <4a683e83$0$9756$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.59.146.189
X-Trace: 1248345731 per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au 9756 203.59.146.189