🚀 go-pugleaf

Dominic Hughes wrote:

> On Mar 29, 1:25 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@bluemail.ch> wrote:

>> For the record, Farey did not reply to me and did not answer
>> my question or pose me the single most important question
>> I would then answer, instead he replied to the junk alias johnk
>> of my second longtime online stalker Panu Petteri H�glund
>> alias John Bulkington alias Patrick Karl alias he himself as
>> his own good friend and pupil Sean Connor soconn1 alias
>> he himself as his own brother in arms and stalking aide John
>> Hobart Kyle jhobartkyle johnk alias he himself as his own bride
>> Annina Kaartinen alias a Rumanian professor who claims to
>> have discovered the origin of language alias he himself as his
>> own bride Maria Kupari alias Peter Groves, the latter his last
>> alias created for this very discussion, my stalker is spawning off,
>> and Farey replied to him because he can't discuss with me.
>> Fine way of arguing, I must say. And you, Elizabeth, play
>> the keyboard of reproaches up and down instead of delivering
>> interpretations, for example how do you explain the key scene
>> of Titus Andronicus, Young Lucius quoting two lines by Horace
>> and handing them over as his "weapon"? I don't engage myself
>> in conspiracy theories, I look out for meaning, and I delivered
>> interpretations of five plays that show them and the author,
>> or rather double author - both your poets -, in a new light.
>> What can you hold against it? only reproaches and general
>> accusations?
>
> Your paranoia is as worrisome as your writing style (if it can be
> called that).  Peter Groves is not an alias of your alleged stalker.
> He is, in fact, an actual person.  see the following link:
> http://arts.monash.edu.au/ecps/people/peter-groves/

You fail to appreciate that with the internet,
fake identities have become as commonplace
as in Shake-speare's time.  The best evidence
available to us here is Gnaedinger's sense of
tone.  If he says that Groves has been
persecuting him for years, we should believe
him. 

Groves may --- or may not -- be the character
he represents in Australia.  Even if he is, he
may have stolen that identity a long time ago. 
I happen to know the checks that universities
used to make when hiring new lecturers and --
even if everything else is apparently above
board -- Groves may well be a complete fake.
The real Groves is likely to be still in England,
working in some even lower-grade job, such
as a civil service clerk.

In any case, it is highly probable that the
Groves character in Australia wrote under the
other names Gnaedinger complains about.

> If you devoted a mere minute of time looking into Professor Grove's
> presence here at HLAS (and we're lucky to have someone with his
> expertise) you would have realized your error.

You need to acquire some slight level of
scepticism -- otherwise you will believe all
manner of nonsense, such as you express
in that paragraph.


Paul.