🚀 go-pugleaf

On 7 Mar, 23:10, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@bluemail.ch> wrote:
> Edward de Vere and William Shakespeare
>
> The following eight messages, posted from February 28
> to March 7, 2010, document my discovery of a subtext
> in the play Romeo and Juliet, revealing Romeo as
> alter ego of the playwright Edward de Vere, Juliet as
> personified audience, and valiant Romeo as William
> Shakespeare, director and main actor of the Globe.
> Please try to ignore my intitial mistakes; those that are
> crucial for my hypothesis will be corrected later on.
>
> ----------------
> (message 1)
>
> Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
>
> Romeo, in the play Romeo and Juliet, is mentioned
> for the first time in a question
>
> O, where is Romeo?
>
> a question offering a pun
>
> O, Vere is Romeo!
>
> a pun providing an answer
>
>   de Vere, Oxford

That's not the answer, Gnaedinger, if that's your real
name.

O was bawdy Elizabethan for orgasm.

Oxford's first cousin Bacon left a commonplace
book with a hundred and twenty notes for Romeo
and Juliet, the notebook dated to the period the play
was written.

It's full of notes for bawdy jests found in the play.

For example, there's a risque double entendre
for orgasm in the play in a line delivered by the bawdy
nurse in R & J and another refers to the erection
men tend to get in the morning.

As a child, Bacon had a bawdy nurse who would come
into the nursery every night and tell Bacon and his brother
Anthony the most wonderful tales.  I assume that's
the reason that Bacon grew up to be "best for comedy,"
speaking of plays, not personal appearance, Bacon was
"comely."

In the 16th century the English Puritans weren't puritanical,
Falstaff is a Puritan.  Even in New England the Puritans
weren't puritanical, they fostered the institution of the
Lusty Marriage.

Historians have misconstrued their rabid opposition
to adultery, mistaking it for sexual puritanism. In
fact the Lusty Marriage, no doubt in some extent
influenced by the Shakespeare works  is the first
instance of feminism I have found.

I wrote a paper on the subject of the feminism
that emerged from the Lusty Marriage (in which
men and women were considered to be sexually
equal in the literal sense).,

>
> Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford who signed his early
> works EO as in Romeo romEO, the pronounced English
> initials E and O resembling Italian io meaning I, it's me.
> The bard mentioned that his name is bound by one letter,
> which is true for the name, the pun, and the answer.

You need to get caught up.  Three new proofs that Oxford
did not write the Shakespeare works have emerged in the
last few weeks.

Oxfordianism should never have been established.

Looney didn't have the resources to write an
authorship biography of Oxford so he fell back on
romantic rhetoric, which history shows is a very
dangerous thing.

> Edward de Vere    E...e    12 letters  (name)
>
>   O, Vere is Romeo    O...o    12 letters  (pun)
>
>   de Vere, Oxford    d...d    12 letters  (answer)
>
> whereby the binding letters of the name E and pun O
> yield the initials of the title
>
>   Earl of Oxford    12 letters  (title)
>
> Name, pun, answer and title contain 12 letters each,
> accordingly Juliet in the orchard is awaiting Romeo's
> message at twelve.

I'll leave that for Neuendorffer to critique.

Wow, Neuendroffer and Gnaedinger, you guys should
work up an act and take it on the road.

>
[. . . ]