Article View: sci.materials
Article #100Re: Superconducting Gallium Arsenide... what's the latest?
From: Alison Chaiken
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 05:37
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 05:37
16 lines
1161 bytes
1161 bytes
parks@gibbs.physics.purdue.edu (Chris Parks) writes: >It is my understanding that the original claim published in >Phys. Rev. Lett. was bogus. The reason for it was explained to me >long ago and I've since forgotten. I'd also be interested in the >reason if anyone knows. >Chris Parks >parks@physics.purdue.edu Through the rumor mill I've heard that the superconductivity was real but that the superconductor was either Ga or As. It's too bad PRL doesn't print retractions. (I guess it would take too many pages ;-) -- --- Alison Chaiken alison@wsrcc.com (510) 422-7129 [daytime] or chaiken@cmsgee.llnl.gov
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BsnGxw.36L@wsrcc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!nocsun.NOC.Vitalink.COM!wsrcc!alisonReferences:
<zyxm4pb@lynx.unm.edu> <8018@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!nocsun.NOC.Vitalink.COM!wsrcc!alison From: alison@wsrcc.com (Alison Chaiken) Newsgroups: sci.materials Subject: Re: Superconducting Gallium Arsenide... what's the latest? Keywords: As precipitates, superconductivity Message-ID: <BsnGxw.36L@wsrcc.com> Date: 8 Aug 92 05:37:07 GMT References: <zyxm4pb@lynx.unm.edu> <8018@dirac.physics.purdue.edu> Organization: W S Rupprecht Computer Consulting, Fremont CA Lines: 16