Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #411DETERMINISM 2: `Refutation' the second
From: David Spurrett
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 10:49
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 10:49
38 lines
2685 bytes
2685 bytes
DETERMINISM 2: `Refutation' number two.
o-----------------------------------------------------------------------o
| This posting is part of a series of monomaniac diatribes. Please |
| email if you want to follow anything up. |
o-----------------------------------------------------------------------o
I explicitly do not want to get all technical here, and certainly do not
want to get involved in any of the truly vexed questions of the interpreta-
tion of Quantum Mechanics (QM). The following argument is, however, fairly
simple, and to my knowledge not especially contentious. In particular it
does not rely upon any assumptions about (non-)locality. Here it is:
Atomic-type things, for example Neutrons, have things called `half
lives' which are periods of time over which half of any given collecion
of the type of thing in question will `decay', or change into something
else.
The QM description of things involves treating every Neutron (sticking
with our current example) as identical. Indeed it involves treating them
as `the same' to the extent, in effect, of regarding there as being only
_one_ (busy as a one legged man at an ass kickin' contest) Neutron in ex-
istence. To repeat: we have no theoretical reason to regard two
`different' Neutrons as different. _BUT_ of any two, over the half-life
period, only _ONE_ will decay.
From situations between which we have no reason to distinguish, we get
clearly _different_ outcomes. Hence the falsity of determinism, which
holds that the way the past was/present is necessitates a unique (and al-
ready specifed/specifiable) future.
Any thoughts?
o------------------------------------------o------------------------------o
| David Spurrett, department of Philosophy | `I have seen the truth, and |
| University of Natal, Durban | it makes no sense.' |
| email: spurrett@superbowl.und.ac.za | - OFFICIAL! |
o------------------------------------------o------------------------------o
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<spurrett.24.720960561@superbowl.und.ac.za>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!shrike.und.ac.za!pc13.superbowl.und.ac.za!spurrettReferences:
<spurrett.18.720882738@superbowl.und.ac.za>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!shrike.und.ac.za!pc13.superbowl.und.ac.za!spurrett From: spurrett@superbowl.und.ac.za (David Spurrett) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: DETERMINISM 2: `Refutation' the second Message-ID: <spurrett.24.720960561@superbowl.und.ac.za> Date: 5 Nov 92 10:49:21 GMT Article-I.D.: superbow.spurrett.24.720960561 References: <spurrett.18.720882738@superbowl.und.ac.za> Organization: University Of Natal (Durban) Lines: 38 NNTP-Posting-Host: pc13.superbowl.und.ac.za