🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #482

Re: Re: nano-replicator assumptions

#482
From: Mike Powell
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:59
23 lines
1308 bytes
	
	This is a silly question IMHO.... of course it is possible
	to make a "machine" that can replicate itself....

	Of course it could not make itself infinitely....
	and of course it would need an 'environment' with
	resources.

	The argument that the LIFE simulation is an invalid example
	because it requires a processor is incorrect.  The processor
	is simply the enviroment.

	We know that factories build the goods for other factories.
	We know how to build automated factories (NeXT boards are said to
	never be touched by human hands).

	How "identical" must it be?  If it must be absolutely identical to
	the placement of every atom.... well of course that is not
	possible.  While no two 'things' can be said to be identical
	in the absolute sense, things can be said to be 'replicas' of
	other things.

	-Mike-
Technical Details
Message-ID: <470001@hpmwmat.sr.hp.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!hpmwtd!mikep
References: <1992Aug26.171151.1898@skynet.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: mikep@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com (Mike Powell)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:59:19 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: nano-replicator assumptions
Message-ID: <470001@hpmwmat.sr.hp.com>
Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (SRSD MWTD)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!hpmwtd!mikep
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
References: <1992Aug26.171151.1898@skynet.uucp>
Lines: 24