Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #482Re: Re: nano-replicator assumptions
From: Mike Powell
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:59
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:59
23 lines
1308 bytes
1308 bytes
This is a silly question IMHO.... of course it is possible to make a "machine" that can replicate itself.... Of course it could not make itself infinitely.... and of course it would need an 'environment' with resources. The argument that the LIFE simulation is an invalid example because it requires a processor is incorrect. The processor is simply the enviroment. We know that factories build the goods for other factories. We know how to build automated factories (NeXT boards are said to never be touched by human hands). How "identical" must it be? If it must be absolutely identical to the placement of every atom.... well of course that is not possible. While no two 'things' can be said to be identical in the absolute sense, things can be said to be 'replicas' of other things. -Mike-
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<470001@hpmwmat.sr.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!hpmwtd!mikepReferences:
<1992Aug26.171151.1898@skynet.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: mikep@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com (Mike Powell) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:59:19 GMT Subject: Re: Re: nano-replicator assumptions Message-ID: <470001@hpmwmat.sr.hp.com> Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (SRSD MWTD) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!hpmwtd!mikep Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech References: <1992Aug26.171151.1898@skynet.uucp> Lines: 24