Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #620Re: nano-replicator assumptions
From: Frank Adams
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:49
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:49
23 lines
1547 bytes
1547 bytes
In article <H13PsB3w165w@netlink.cts.com> snodgras@netlink.cts.com (John Snodgrass) writes: >frank@Cookie.secapl.com (Frank Adams) writes: >> As an intelligent entity, I have a number of purposes, one of which is to >> survive. Why should I single out this purpose as my purpose *as an >> organism*? > > Because, if you didn't survive, you would no longer be an >organism. Put another way, if you didn't survive, all your other purposes >(which I would label as _derivative_ purposes) would become irrelevent. But they wouldn't. One of my purposes is to keep my family alive; I care about their continued survival even in the event of my demise. It is true that I would not continue to have these other purposes after dying; but I would also cease having them if I became permanently unconscious. Why isn't remaining conscious my purpose as an organism? >> One "purpose" >> derives from the evolutionary dynamic; the other is inseparably part of the >> behavior of an intelligent entity. > > The "intelligent entity" is a product of your imagination. If I wasn't an intelligent entity, I wouldn't have an imagination.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct16.224922.33682@Cookie.secapl.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!secapl!Cookie!frankReferences:
<1992Oct12.185516.138479@Cookie.secapl.com> <H13PsB3w165w@netlink.cts.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!secapl!Cookie!frank From: frank@Cookie.secapl.com (Frank Adams) Subject: Re: nano-replicator assumptions Message-ID: <1992Oct16.224922.33682@Cookie.secapl.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:49:22 GMT References: <1992Oct12.185516.138479@Cookie.secapl.com> <H13PsB3w165w@netlink.cts.com> Organization: Security APL, Inc. Lines: 25