🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan21.195455.26027@ulrik.uio.no>, solan@smauguio.no (Svein Olav G. Nyberg) writes:
>In article <C17sFv.L03@umassd.edu>, pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU (Stephen
>Grossman) writes:
>|> Quantum mechanics-the mechanics of quanta
>|> Quanta-Nietzsche's active centers of energy, randomly combining into
>temporary 
>|> 	entities
>|> mechanics-study of energy and entities
>|> 
>|> QM-the probability of random energy 
>|> 
>|> When QM "scientists" stop sneakin' bits of reality and reason into their 
>|> "science" they will light some incense, mumble the appropriate chant, and 
>|> prostrate themselves before the ineffable. Ommmmmmmm.........
>
>As I wrote to Betsy, it is better to meet you with decent argument.
>I think the above is an example of a nonsensical letter. There is no
>argument, no support of any assertions, and even barely a statement.
>The only thing that is happening is that you are talking unsubstantiated
>nonsense about "scientists". I _might_ even agree to the sentiment
>behind what you have written, but what you have written is worthless.
>Objectively.

SG	What sentiment? I provided definitions and a judgement about philsophy 
of science. My truncated style is no excuse to avoid my ideas. 	
________________________________________________________________________________
	"In that world, you'll be able to rise in the morning with the spirit
you had known in your childhood: that spirit of eagerness, adventure and cer-
tainty which comes from dealing with a rational universe."
                                                              AYN RAND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Grossman <PMSC13SG@UMASSD.EDU>
================================================================================