🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #891

Re: Stephen Grossman

#891
From: Stephen Grossman
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:41
52 lines
3125 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.202625.27001@ulrik.uio.no>, solan@smauguio.no (Svein Olav G. Nyberg) writes:
>In article <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se>, torkel@sics.se (Torkel
>Franzen) writes:
>|> In article <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no> solan@smaug.uio.no 
>|> (Svein Olav G. Nyberg) writes:
>|> 
>|>    >and will like Voltaire defend even his right to be met by proper
>|>    >argument, and not simply abusive language.
>|> 
>|>   I haven't noticed Voltaire saying anything about Grossman. But you are
>|> a bit hasty, surely, in speaking of his "right to be met by proper
>|> argument". Why do suppose that we have a right to be met by "proper
>|> argument" (whatever this term may mean to you), whatever abusive twaddle
>|> we spout on the net ourselves?
>
>I think it is important first to show that the guy is spreading
>"abusive twaddle" on the net, however obvious it may seem to one-
>self, regardless of person, for two reasons:
>
>1. We're showing the guy exactly what he is doing, which is
>   a stronger corrective than mere shouting and swearing. He
>   thereby gets a chance to improve himself, 

SG	Improve myself? I don't understand...That's like discussing God as 
potential...

instead of perhaps
>   being just ignorant about what he's doing.
>
>2. It _might_ have been misunderstood, and gives the guy a chance
>   to defend himself. If he cannot defend his actions without
>   further abusive twaddle, we have positively shown him what he
>   has done.
>
>In any case, the outcome is better than immediate fight.
>
>I do agree, however, that if the person in question ignore the
>good attempts and/or go on like before, then he might be told
>what your gut feelings towards him are. But first telling a
>person what he is actually doing wrong might save the newsgroup
>from a lot of flaming, and will therefore be in our own best
>interests.

SG	I have a radical suggestion: discuss philosophy instead of me.
________________________________________________________________________________
	"In that world, you'll be able to rise in the morning with the spirit
you had known in your childhood: that spirit of eagerness, adventure and cer-
tainty which comes from dealing with a rational universe."
                                                              AYN RAND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Grossman <PMSC13SG@UMASSD.EDU>
================================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C1F51E.FGA@umassd.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!umassd.edu!SMUCS1.UMASSD.EDU!PMSC13SG
References: <spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se>,<1993Jan21.202625.27001@ulrik.uio.no>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!umassd.edu!SMUCS1.UMASSD.EDU!PMSC13SG
From: pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU (Stephen Grossman)
Subject: Re: Stephen Grossman
Message-ID: <C1F51E.FGA@umassd.edu>
Sender: usenet@umassd.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU
Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA.
References: <spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se>,<1993Jan21.202625.27001@ulrik.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:41:37 GMT
Lines: 52