πŸš€ go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5575

Re: LEE SMOLIN AGAINST ISAAC NEWTON

#5575
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:11
61 lines
4102 bytes
On Feb 7, 10:51 am, srp2...@gmail.com wrote:
[...}

> > > Any theory that predicts anything about light without reference
> > > to electromagnetism and Maxwell can only be a mathematical patchwork
> > > doomed to end up in file 13.
>
> > Where do you think the massless assumption came from?
>
> From ignorance of the nature of electromagnetic energy.

Wrong, try again.

1) Solid research places error bars on photon mass at the 10^-17 eV
level. Consistent with zero.
2) Maxwell's equations have no mass coupling.
3) Proca's equations - Maxwell's equations for a massive photon - are
distinctly different from Maxwell's equations.

>
> > You could, in theory, solve the field equations for a electromagnetic
> > stress-energy tensor with a plane wave solution. Good luck solving
> > that.
>
> The Copenhagen community's moto:
>
> Why make things simple when you can make them complicated ?

You were the one bitching about me giving the simple answer. In the
optics limit, Maxwell's equations do not matter so long as waves
travel along null paths.

If you want the exact answer, yea it's gonna be complicated.
Pretending it isn't is dishonest.

>
> > > > Is there a particular
> > > > reason you can't open up a textbook, see the derivation, repeat the
> > > > derivation, and compare with observation?
>
> > > I have and have rejected the method. I have a much better integrated
> > > one that can even explain the stuff that GR can't deal with.
>
> > If you still don't understand how GR can make the predictions it does
> > and that it doesn't assume the things you don't think it does, no, you
> > haven't.
>
> > Work on the mundane before you attack the subtle. If your theory can't
> > explain prosaic effects like perihelion precession, why would it
> > accurately explain whatever fringe effect you are focusing on this
> > time?
>
> You are so disconnected Eric that it edges on unconsciousness.
>
> Why don't you wake up.

Why don't you prove your ability before making sweeping claims about
the physics community?

>
> AndrΓ© Michaud
Technical Details
Message-ID: <e1db04b8-540c-49c3-b3f1-06d6e1583010@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <e3cb16d6-c73b-4e59-9f50-5cda6da5d475@m62g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <4695358e-db97-4485-94b4-06f417a451d4@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <6fbc34d0-9c6f-427d-8bb8-ad4f7aae5086@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <aa58a4e4-9ca1-4a06-adf7-c876cd7114ad@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <43f2564b-5f92-4427-ae78-06808efb2553@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <239b3bad-87cd-4031-b0f3-047782720f8d@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1fb930ef-a5bd-46a8-80c6-8e0229e14d9d@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <161480cc-c795-4979-b35a-6b7149a8d955@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,89f2be10e566fb3e
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,89f2be10e566fb3e
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,89f2be10e566fb3e
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,89f2be10e566fb3e
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,89f2be10e566fb3e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, fr.sci.physique, 
 fr.sci.maths, fr.sci.philo
Subject: Re: LEE SMOLIN AGAINST ISAAC NEWTON
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <e1db04b8-540c-49c3-b3f1-06d6e1583010@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <e3cb16d6-c73b-4e59-9f50-5cda6da5d475@m62g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> 
 <4695358e-db97-4485-94b4-06f417a451d4@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <6fbc34d0-9c6f-427d-8bb8-ad4f7aae5086@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <aa58a4e4-9ca1-4a06-adf7-c876cd7114ad@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <43f2564b-5f92-4427-ae78-06808efb2553@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <239b3bad-87cd-4031-b0f3-047782720f8d@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <1fb930ef-a5bd-46a8-80c6-8e0229e14d9d@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <161480cc-c795-4979-b35a-6b7149a8d955@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.229.51.210
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1202422279 19655 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2008 22:11:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 22:11:19 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.229.51.210; 
 posting-account=rIfu6QoAAAD5nXG3h9QEE0J3dZn1U45R
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) 
 Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)