Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7602Re: sdrodrian's hypothesis
From: don_quixote
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 00:00
54 lines
3041 bytes
3041 bytes
In article <389F82B3.489A5C6@hate.spam.net>, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote: > > > S D Rodrian wrote: > > > > In article <01bf71ad$8da142e0$c1cff1c3@default>, > > "Peter van Velzen" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote: > > > > Peter, although I am having a hard time finding the time to > > even read posts at this time, you seem to have skirted about > > my conclusion that the universe indeed HAS to be imploding > > and CANNOT possibly be anything like a Big Bang universe. > > [snip] > > Since all empirical evidence is against you, Sorry, Unk, but all empirical evidence is against you + 1. > I'd say your "conclusion" > is at least daft Well, at least it's to you level of understanding (or, how else could you've judged it properly?). > and more likely hallucinogenic. If you'd rather see it from that perspective, more power to you, duuuuude! Just don't drive. > If you think sincere > belief carries any weight, try visiting an insane asylum. Hell, where'd you think I've been the last 1000 posts?!?!?! Don't they tell it to you guys the way it is in here. man? Here, have a lollipop! AND FOR GOD'S SAKE PLEASE STOP SINGING THAT STUPID "Lollipop, lollipop..." SONG. Nurse! These guys are ready for their candies! S D Rodrian sdr@t-three.com http://members.aol.com/mrealms/470.htm > > -- > Uncle Al Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<88445s$a47$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<28868-3879149C-128@storefull-108.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <86ihho$3sh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38916AD2.2067E99E@domain.com> <86tjil$6pg$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3893225A.9BEBB59F@home.com> <8700lf$pol$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38944189.66E339DB@earthlink.net> <872as2$ajt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3894C431.E25D3297@louisville.edu> <874rbo$3nu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <L9BY9tzSDwrQ-pn2-rmz9QupYvcdj@localhost> <877jmd$4b7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <L9BY9tzSDwrQ-pn2-Du8JOKf1utn9@localhost> <87apg1$frf$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <L9BY9tzSDwrQ-pn2-ZTIcSkt9q7Hr@localhost> <87ib5a$nbm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <C27n4.2439$p01.65810@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <87lfno$q00$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <01bf71ad$8da142e0$c1cff1c3@default> <87nq6c$gso$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <389F82B3.489A5C6@hate.spam.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111458,191d6f0f5665595b X-Google-Attributes: gid111458,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,191d6f0f5665595b X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,191d6f0f5665595b X-Google-Attributes: gid103d8c,public X-Google-Thread: 10cc56,191d6f0f5665595b X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc56,public From: don_quixote@mindless.com Subject: Re: sdrodrian's hypothesis Date: 2000/02/12 Message-ID: <88445s$a47$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Deja-AN: 584976224 References: <28868-3879149C-128@storefull-108.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <86ihho$3sh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38916AD2.2067E99E@domain.com> <86tjil$6pg$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3893225A.9BEBB59F@home.com> <8700lf$pol$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38944189.66E339DB@earthlink.net> <872as2$ajt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3894C431.E25D3297@louisville.edu> <874rbo$3nu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <L9BY9tzSDwrQ-pn2-rmz9QupYvcdj@localhost> <877jmd$4b7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <L9BY9tzSDwrQ-pn2-Du8JOKf1utn9@localhost> <87apg1$frf$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <L9BY9tzSDwrQ-pn2-ZTIcSkt9q7Hr@localhost> <87ib5a$nbm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <C27n4.2439$p01.65810@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <87lfno$q00$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <01bf71ad$8da142e0$c1cff1c3@default> <87nq6c$gso$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <389F82B3.489A5C6@hate.spam.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 171.217.234.17 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Feb 12 17:10:22 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDsd_rodrian_i Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,de.sci.physik,humanities.misc,sci.logic X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (Win98; U)