🚀 go-pugleaf

rbwinn wrote:
> On Jul 16, 12:06 am, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>> rbwinn wrote:
>>> On Jul 14, 11:41 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2:51 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 3:42 pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 12:17 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 6:33�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:5cb50cba-4ba0-439e-b696-171329756f9a@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:32?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 8:08 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...@swbell.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:54:03 +0100, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:a122c089-a15c-4a1f-9e0c-9f988874845c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 9, 11:00 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 8:24?pm, hhyaps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean there isn't any evidence he existed and it upsets you that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atheists notice this fact...- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could care less what atheists do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===========================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then WTF do you reply to us?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The godless one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a.a.# 2279
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not speaking for Robert, but my replies aren't to you, or to any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific atheist. My replies are intended for other readers who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't yet passed the point of no return, and might be looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insights from a Christian's perspective. ? Gordon
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you wish to return to the dark age when everything was barbaric.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Christian perspective as as evil as human can imagine....the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> killing of non-believers, the slavery, the slaughter of Indians in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> North/South America for their lands, the conquest of Iraq for its
>>>>>>>>>>>>> oil...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we need to forward more examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what about the sins of greed, murder planted by your god? You
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't pick goodies for god and badies ?not from god. I guess you will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be just as hypocrite to pick and choose.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, you are certainly welcome to your own opinion of me.
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==============================
>>>>>>>>>>>> The general opinion of you in a.a. is that you're a pig-ignorant, obnoxious,
>>>>>>>>>>>> rude, cowardly, lying moron without the intelligence (or is it honesty?) to
>>>>>>>>>>>> understand a simple concept. You have no concept of logic or the real world
>>>>>>>>>>>> outside your religion.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>>>>>> It seems strange to me that you would want to talk to someone you
>>>>>>>>>>> believe is the way you describe me.  What causes you to keep making
>>>>>>>>>>> these posts?
>>>>>>>>>> its scientific research. Its not often you get the chance to probe the
>>>>>>>>>> depths of human delusion, stupidity and cupidity to the extent that you
>>>>>>>>>> offer.
>>>>>>>>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
>>>>>>>>> pornography.
>>>>>>>> Whilst I admit that talking to you is somewhat akin to conversing with a
>>>>>>>> paedophile, I personally haven't seen any pornography since I had tea
>>>>>>>> with a gay christian, whose rent boy pulled it all out from under the
>>>>>>>> sofa to show us 'what we get up to'..
>>>>>>>> That was in my time of hanging ou with the London society of the Golden
>>>>>>>> Dawn. Started by that great ex (plymouth Brethren) christian, Aleister
>>>>>>>> Crowley.
>>>>>>>> sadly on all counts it was a waste of time.
>>>>>>>  Uh huh.  Well, I was not asking for details of your sins.  They do
>>>>>>> not interest me.
>>>>>> That's because you are an utterly selfish person.
>>>>>> If you were not interested in my so called sins, why did you make te
>>>>>> statement:-
>>>>>>  >>> I see.  You probably say something similar about looking at
>>>>>>  >>> pornography.
>>>>> So are you admitting that you have sins?  This would be a first for an
>>>>> atheist.  All other atheists tell me that they do not have sins
>>>>> because whatever they do is not sin.
>>>> Sin is a religious concept. A-theist. Geddit?
>>>> I sometime behave immorally, but for me to call that "sin" would be
>>>> nonsensical, as I don't believe in the gods of the religions that
>>>> profess the concept.
>>>> It's not that hard, is it?- Hide quoted text -
>>> Well, I would suppose that it all depends on what you want after this
>>> life.  According to Jesus Christ, the requirement for entering heaven
>>> is repentance from sins.  So most people say, No, I will not give up
>>> this or that sin.  Well, that means the person will follow that sin
>>> where it goes.
>> We're atheists you see, to us your belief in the afterlife is childish
>> wishful thinking. Unless you have some reason for us to take it seriously?
>>
>> Anything other than your failed claims about Hezekiah's Tunnel that is,
>> we ain't buying that one!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> So you are still claiming that Hezekiah's tunnel was not constructed.
> Why do you think there is a tunnel where three books of the Bible say
> Hezekiah's tunnel was dug?

It must be fun to contend opinions that no-one has claimed. It was 
constructed, but looks like an expansion of an existing natural feature.