Article View: sci.physics
Article #15773Re: Answers to Mr. Ben : Michelson's mirrors Re: How to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment without SR?
From: NoEinstein
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:59
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:59
41 lines
3190 bytes
3190 bytes
On Jul 14, 6:26 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote: > Yanick Toutain wrote: > > [snip rest of crap] > > > Michelson and Morley and Miller were wrong about that: They ignored > > the motion of the Sun. > > 1) Michelson-Morley, 1887, no aether to differential 10^(-8) > > 2) 2002, no aether to differential 1.7x10^(-15), > > Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002) > > 3) 2007, no aether to differential 10^(-16), > > http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 > Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 050401 (2007) > > Two simultaneous interferometers ==> over a year's observation <==: > Optical in Berlin, Germany at 52°31'N 13°20'E and microwave in Perth, > Australia at 31°53'S 115°53E. An aether background could never be at > rest relative to both of them. No vacuum dispersion, no vacuum > dichroism. > > 4) Fucking imbecile. > > -- > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 Dear Uncle Al: The ether flow at the Earth's surface is straight down. That's what causes the force of gravity. Interferometer experiments expecting to detect ether that is just waiting in Earth's path, don't take into account that ether rotates WITH the Earth and flows straight down. At higher distances the ether flow is at an angle. Think of this like looking at storm systems on Earth. Understanding ether flow is really like understanding weather systems. — NoEinstein —
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6752720a-a6b9-4a87-822a-fabd160d3cb6@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<c37b0c42-9b18-4dda-b98e-3332d6230159@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <e56affa6-c909-49b6-a18c-efaf863b11b2@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <487BD27E.AB8E02B@hate.spam.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,bf63eac6f1f31d0 X-Google-Thread: f8805,77df68ff333f0d1d X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,4f661654e9e2c9c3 X-Google-Thread: 111645,77df68ff333f0d1d X-Google-Thread: f55d3,77df68ff333f0d1d X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gidf8805,gidfa4c1,gid111645,gidf55d3,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics,tw.bbs.sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,fr.sci.philo Subject: Re: Answers to Mr. Ben : Michelson's mirrors Re: How to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment without SR? Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 41 Message-ID: <6752720a-a6b9-4a87-822a-fabd160d3cb6@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <c37b0c42-9b18-4dda-b98e-3332d6230159@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <e56affa6-c909-49b6-a18c-efaf863b11b2@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <487BD27E.AB8E02B@hate.spam.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.4.155.214 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216259966 4887 127.0.0.1 (17 Jul 2008 01:59:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.4.155.214; posting-account=8k9z_QoAAABfJ6zct3wDB2k3FKfRerU2 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)