Article View: sci.physics
Article #8174Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times
From: NoMoreCons
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:22
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:22
71 lines
4184 bytes
4184 bytes
"Surfer" <no@spam.net> wrote in message news:uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com... > On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:00:17 -0500, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> > wrote: > > >> >> >>Nice apologia >> Doesn't change a bit that since they can't account for the source and >>destination of all that energy, they have a problem with supporting their >>claim. >> > > The principle claim was "Global warming is still happening" made at a > time when surface temperature was temporarily decreasing. > > That claim could have been supported by accounting for the source and > destination of energy and a hypothesis was made that energy was being > absorbed at ocean depths greater than 900 m. > > However, the claim can also be supported by simply showing that global > mean surface temperature has an upward trend line, in spite of > temporary downward fluctuations. > > The following shows that this is the case: > http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Global Mean Temp.jpg > > > Also, consistent with the above. > > - Global mean troposphere temperature has an upward trend line > http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/0710_graf.jpg?w=500&h=183 > > - Arctic sea ice extent has a downward trend line > http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/n_plot_hires.png > > - Antarctic mass has a downward trend line > http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html > > - Global sea level continues to rise > http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png > >> >>In other words, they're saying: >> - We don't know what's happening. > Not the full details. But the general picture is known. > >> - We have no handle on the data > There is lots of data that show that global warming is real. > You should at least look at the links above. > >> - We don't even have a computer model that works properly > There are many computer models and they appear to work as well as > expected. > >> - But we know that our conclusions are good. > Basic physics predicts warming, computer models predict warming and > the temperature data shows warming. > >> >>That's NOT the way science is supposed to work >> > > Science works by making and testing hypthesises and theories. That > seems to be happening. > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<hCiAo.7065$lL3.6054@newsfe08.iad>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe08.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mailReferences:
<365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <4ccb5259$0$316$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <pl8pc696omq07c1btce8jagl676cjr4d1j@4ax.com> <4cccf191$0$11222$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <m3vqc6tjv2ja47k6emr5aphjpeudbctf03@4ax.com> <yuqdnfrMyrM1GVDRnZ2dnUVZ_tEAAAAA@bright.net> <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10d4c6,92898df7e6a384b5,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gid9e5a772d74,gid4af714e08b,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe08.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail From: "NoMoreCons@cda.ca" <Nothanks@provider.ca> Newsgroups: sci.physics,aus.politics,us.politics References: <365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <4ccb5259$0$316$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <pl8pc696omq07c1btce8jagl676cjr4d1j@4ax.com> <4cccf191$0$11222$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <m3vqc6tjv2ja47k6emr5aphjpeudbctf03@4ax.com> <yuqdnfrMyrM1GVDRnZ2dnUVZ_tEAAAAA@bright.net> <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times Lines: 73 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101103-1, 11/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-ID: <hCiAo.7065$lL3.6054@newsfe08.iad> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.66.42.118 X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca X-Trace: newsfe08.iad 1288812045 70.66.42.118 (Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:20:45 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:20:45 UTC Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:22:51 -0700