🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #8174

Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times

#8174
From: NoMoreCons
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:22
71 lines
4184 bytes
"Surfer" <no@spam.net> wrote in message news:uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:00:17 -0500, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Nice apologia
>>    Doesn't change a bit that since they can't account for the source and
>>destination of all that energy, they have a problem with supporting their
>>claim.
>>
>
> The principle claim was "Global warming is still happening" made at a
> time when surface temperature was temporarily decreasing.
>
> That claim could have been supported by accounting for the source and
> destination of energy and a hypothesis was made that energy was being
> absorbed at ocean depths greater than 900 m.
>
> However, the claim can also be supported by simply showing that global
> mean surface temperature has an upward trend line, in spite of
> temporary downward fluctuations.
>
> The following shows that this is the case:
> http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Global Mean Temp.jpg
>
>
> Also, consistent with the above.
>
> - Global mean troposphere temperature has an upward trend line
> http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/0710_graf.jpg?w=500&h=183
>
> - Arctic sea ice extent has a downward trend line
> http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/n_plot_hires.png
>
> - Antarctic mass has a downward trend line
> http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html
>
> - Global sea level continues to rise
> http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
>>
>>In other words, they're saying:
>>    -    We don't know what's happening.
> Not the full details. But the general picture is known.
>
>>    -    We have no handle on the data
> There is lots of data that show that global warming is real.
> You should at least look at the links above.
>
>>    -    We don't even have a computer model that works properly
> There are many computer models and they appear to work as well as
> expected.
>
>>    -    But we know that our conclusions are good.
> Basic physics predicts warming, computer models predict warming and
> the temperature data shows warming.
>
>>
>>That's NOT the way science is supposed to work
>>
>
> Science works by making and testing hypthesises and theories. That
> seems to be happening.
>
>
>
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <hCiAo.7065$lL3.6054@newsfe08.iad>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe08.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
References: <365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <4ccb5259$0$316$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <pl8pc696omq07c1btce8jagl676cjr4d1j@4ax.com> <4cccf191$0$11222$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <m3vqc6tjv2ja47k6emr5aphjpeudbctf03@4ax.com> <yuqdnfrMyrM1GVDRnZ2dnUVZ_tEAAAAA@bright.net> <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,573352c024c442c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,573352c024c442c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10d4c6,92898df7e6a384b5,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gid9e5a772d74,gid4af714e08b,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe08.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
From: "NoMoreCons@cda.ca" <Nothanks@provider.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,aus.politics,us.politics
References: <365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <4ccb5259$0$316$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <pl8pc696omq07c1btce8jagl676cjr4d1j@4ax.com> <4cccf191$0$11222$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <m3vqc6tjv2ja47k6emr5aphjpeudbctf03@4ax.com> <yuqdnfrMyrM1GVDRnZ2dnUVZ_tEAAAAA@bright.net> <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times
Lines: 73
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101103-1, 11/03/2010), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <hCiAo.7065$lL3.6054@newsfe08.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.66.42.118
X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca
X-Trace: newsfe08.iad 1288812045 70.66.42.118 (Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:20:45 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:20:45 UTC
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:22:51 -0700