Article View: sci.physics
Article #8175Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times
From: SaPeIsMa
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:50
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:50
74 lines
4676 bytes
4676 bytes
"Surfer" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:00:17 -0500, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Nice apologia
>> Doesn't change a bit that since they can't account for the source and
>>destination of all that energy, they have a problem with supporting their
>>claim.
>>
>
> The principle claim was "Global warming is still happening" made at a
> time when surface temperature was temporarily decreasing.
>
> That claim could have been supported by accounting for the source and
> destination of energy and a hypothesis was made that energy was being
> absorbed at ocean depths greater than 900 m.
>
> However, the claim can also be supported by simply showing that global
> mean surface temperature has an upward trend line, in spite of
> temporary downward fluctuations.
>
> The following shows that this is the case:
> http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Global Mean Temp.jpg
>
>
> Also, consistent with the above.
>
> - Global mean troposphere temperature has an upward trend line
> http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/0710_graf.jpg?w=500&h=183
>
> - Arctic sea ice extent has a downward trend line
> http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/n_plot_hires.png
>
> - Antarctic mass has a downward trend line
> http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html
>
> - Global sea level continues to rise
> http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
>>
>>In other words, they're saying:
>> - We don't know what's happening.
> Not the full details. But the general picture is known.
>
>> - We have no handle on the data
> There is lots of data that show that global warming is real.
> You should at least look at the links above.
>
>> - We don't even have a computer model that works properly
> There are many computer models and they appear to work as well as
> expected.
>
>> - But we know that our conclusions are good.
> Basic physics predicts warming, computer models predict warming and
> the temperature data shows warming.
>
>>
>>That's NOT the way science is supposed to work
>>
>
> Science works by making and testing hypthesises and theories. That
> seems to be happening.
>
>
>
>
Nice continued apoligia and attempt to shore up your
"These are the conclusions on which we base our facts.."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6eednXCY_NS-0EzRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@bright.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.bright.net!news.bright.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <4ccb5259$0$316$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <pl8pc696omq07c1btce8jagl676cjr4d1j@4ax.com> <4cccf191$0$11222$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <m3vqc6tjv2ja47k6emr5aphjpeudbctf03@4ax.com> <yuqdnfrMyrM1GVDRnZ2dnUVZ_tEAAAAA@bright.net> <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fb374,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gid9e5a772d74,gidf4fe430b92,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.bright.net!news.bright.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:53:07 -0500 From: "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,aus.politics,can.politics References: <365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <4ccb5259$0$316$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <pl8pc696omq07c1btce8jagl676cjr4d1j@4ax.com> <4cccf191$0$11222$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <m3vqc6tjv2ja47k6emr5aphjpeudbctf03@4ax.com> <yuqdnfrMyrM1GVDRnZ2dnUVZ_tEAAAAA@bright.net> <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <uue1d61hd2ikr5t38st4jjl429r0gsfh9b@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:50:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Message-ID: <6eednXCY_NS-0EzRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@bright.net> Lines: 76 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.251.191.157 X-Trace: sv3-5ccxP9DQTxjm1xRskXkAWsmvFl28CkupbSiPPOoJ8+j8rO//ea3aYDs5l9S8wF33Mg9SYQJYKZN1vMP!XtMX6E/YjbyzD7J2H2TdCmIHXjSGz8OHmL1C4XlRj7hf6xCMQhwVFx0KuGXcLPO2UosTbgKReAWF!EbsODDkCw2fD X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 4218