Article View: sci.physics
Article #8176Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times
From: SaPeIsMa
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:51
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:51
61 lines
4126 bytes
4126 bytes
"Surfer" <no@spam.net> wrote in message news:kih1d6huj6qrccdagr4s1dci9ir0gvlvj2@4ax.com... > On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:35:05 +1100, Oy rool out a carbon tax > <gillard_lies@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>Surfer wrote: >>> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:58:14 +1100, Oy rool out a carbon tax >>> <gillard_lies@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Surfer wrote: >>>> >>>>>> 1) The IPCC data has been pretty well discredited, >>>>>> >>>>> This error was reported. >>>>> >>>>> IPCC admits Himalayan glacier error >>>>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/55455/title/Science_%2B_the_Public__IPCC_admits_Himalayan_glacier_error >>>>> >>>>> But its been found and corrected. >>>> This in no way absolves the IPCC of its gross ineptitude and its total >>>> discreditation in claiming to be "scientific". >>>> >>> >>> Your ranting isn't scientific. >> >>You clearly have no understanding of science, if you can't see the >>significance of the fundamental blunder of the IPCC. >> > > http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/himalaya-statement-20january2010.pd > "....a paragraph in the 938-page Working Group II contribution to the > underlying assessment2 refers to poorly substantiated estimates of > rate of recession and date for the disappearance of Himalayan > glaciers. In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and > well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC > procedures, were not applied properly...." > > > One paragraph wrong in a 938-page document doesn't sound like a major > issue. > It just takes ONE pin to deflate a balloon > And remember that IPCC documents are publically available, so any > errors are likely to be pointed out sooner or later by someone with > relevant knowledge. > It's been done >> >>What are your scientific qualifications BTW? >> > Using Google to look things up :-) > Too bad that just "looking things up" and NOT "thinking about them" is what you do.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6eednXOY_NS50EzRnZ2dnUVZ_hsAAAAA@bright.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.bright.net!news.bright.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <J8CdnfK6g-SdGlbRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@bright.net> <3depc6pr7f07henv1ek9rrll1ij5dea9rp@4ax.com> <4cccf766$0$5527$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <cbuqc6lnm27qkk4mdc1a09vddn664lo4j1@4ax.com> <4ccd7e99$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <kih1d6huj6qrccdagr4s1dci9ir0gvlvj2@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fb374,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gid9e5a772d74,gidf4fe430b92,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.bright.net!news.bright.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:53:08 -0500 From: "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,aus.politics,can.politics References: <365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <J8CdnfK6g-SdGlbRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@bright.net> <3depc6pr7f07henv1ek9rrll1ij5dea9rp@4ax.com> <4cccf766$0$5527$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <cbuqc6lnm27qkk4mdc1a09vddn664lo4j1@4ax.com> <4ccd7e99$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <kih1d6huj6qrccdagr4s1dci9ir0gvlvj2@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <kih1d6huj6qrccdagr4s1dci9ir0gvlvj2@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:51:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 Message-ID: <6eednXOY_NS50EzRnZ2dnUVZ_hsAAAAA@bright.net> Lines: 62 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.251.191.157 X-Trace: sv3-1G6utYFMXKl8ArTmHHtyolLbWEA+1mTtp9ERyOCz3JYV1EhMfut9WoBBSwvviMRgAgq1M4Dk05WYgGk!cmYxCFMJqWHVKIUPaEdkYKlr8nN+ZRWxGWv04l6eVNBFUfs2KYdReJBr6j7G0dOjLV1QQB927QGM!tC1ihVDfHC3H X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3666