🚀 go-pugleaf

On 9/26/2010 3:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> We have a player!
>
> DanielSan asked one of the following 3 questions.
>
> Name: DanielSan
> Question1: Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
> Question2: Will I get hired for construction?
> Question3: Does God exist?
>
>
> Here is my 'guess' which question he asked.
> b77df81542f82636b6b34251b97406b2
>
> DanielSan can now reveal which question he was thinking of at:
> www.HercsHome.com/AskPsychic.html
>
> Care to post the answer (question) DanielSan and I'll reveal my
> guess which will match the given MD5 above.
>
>
> I could post my guess here but you guys might cheat!

And therefore, you will never get your response because I need to see 
the unencrypted answer to ensure that you won't cheat.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
> On 9/26/2010 3:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> We have a player!
>>
>> DanielSan asked one of the following 3 questions.
>>
>> Name: DanielSan
>> Question1: Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>> Question2: Will I get hired for construction?
>> Question3: Does God exist?
>>
>>
>> Here is my 'guess' which question he asked.
>> b77df81542f82636b6b34251b97406b2
>>
>> DanielSan can now reveal which question he was thinking of at:
>> www.HercsHome.com/AskPsychic.html
>>
>> Care to post the answer (question) DanielSan and I'll reveal my
>> guess which will match the given MD5 above.
>>
>>
>> I could post my guess here but you guys might cheat!
> 
> And therefore, you will never get your response because I need to see 
> the unencrypted answer to ensure that you won't cheat.


If you see the answer (my guess at your question) you can change your mind
and merely post a different question.

I have a 10 digit private key appended to your question and MD5'd.

That is not enough leeway to manipulate a MD5 collision with a different
one of your questions.

Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match the MD5.

Any comp.sci types confirm this for DanielSan?

Herc 

On 9/26/2010 3:08 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>> On 9/26/2010 3:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> We have a player!
>>>
>>> DanielSan asked one of the following 3 questions.
>>>
>>> Name: DanielSan
>>> Question1: Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>> Question2: Will I get hired for construction?
>>> Question3: Does God exist?
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is my 'guess' which question he asked.
>>> b77df81542f82636b6b34251b97406b2
>>>
>>> DanielSan can now reveal which question he was thinking of at:
>>> www.HercsHome.com/AskPsychic.html
>>>
>>> Care to post the answer (question) DanielSan and I'll reveal my
>>> guess which will match the given MD5 above.
>>>
>>>
>>> I could post my guess here but you guys might cheat!
>>
>> And therefore, you will never get your response because I need to see
>> the unencrypted answer to ensure that you won't cheat.
>
>
> If you see the answer (my guess at your question) you can change your mind
> and merely post a different question.
>
> I have a 10 digit private key appended to your question and MD5'd.
>
> That is not enough leeway to manipulate a MD5 collision with a different
> one of your questions.
>
> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match the
> MD5.
>
> Any comp.sci types confirm this for DanielSan?

So, how should I answer the question?


-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match the MD5.

Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.

I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
then tell you the password after you have posted your question?


Herc 

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
> On 9/26/2010 3:08 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> We have a player!
>>>>
>>>> DanielSan asked one of the following 3 questions.
>>>>
>>>> Name: DanielSan
>>>> Question1: Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>> Question2: Will I get hired for construction?
>>>> Question3: Does God exist?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is my 'guess' which question he asked.
>>>> b77df81542f82636b6b34251b97406b2
>>>>
>>>> DanielSan can now reveal which question he was thinking of at:
>>>> www.HercsHome.com/AskPsychic.html
>>>>
>>>> Care to post the answer (question) DanielSan and I'll reveal my
>>>> guess which will match the given MD5 above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I could post my guess here but you guys might cheat!
>>>
>>> And therefore, you will never get your response because I need to see
>>> the unencrypted answer to ensure that you won't cheat.
>>
>>
>> If you see the answer (my guess at your question) you can change your mind
>> and merely post a different question.
>>
>> I have a 10 digit private key appended to your question and MD5'd.
>>
>> That is not enough leeway to manipulate a MD5 collision with a different
>> one of your questions.
>>
>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match the
>> MD5.
>>
>> Any comp.sci types confirm this for DanielSan?
> 
> So, how should I answer the question?


Tell me what question you were thinking of on page 1 of my forms.

Then I'll post 1 of these lines of text.

DanielSan p129 Is my cat a tortoiseshell? 4387473737
DanielSan p129 Will I get hired for construction? 3673737878
DanielSan p129 Does God exist? 3847473873


If my line of text contains your original question AND it MD5's to
the MD5 in this post - then I read your mind! ........ with 1in3 chance it was just a fluke.

i.e. I broke 3:1 odds on a paranormal test IF they match.


Herc 

On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>> the MD5.
>
> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>
> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?

Yes, do that.  Provide my original question in a zip and then you can 
password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from 
you.  I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you 
can't change it on me.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>> the MD5.
>>
>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>
>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
> 
> Yes, do that.  Provide my original question in a zip and then you can 
> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from 
> you.  I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you 
> can't change it on me.
> 

My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)

www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip


Herc 

On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>>> the MD5.
>>>
>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>
>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>
>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>> can't change it on me.
>>
>
> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>
> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip

Is my cat a tortoiseshell?


-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote 
> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>
>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>
>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>
>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>> can't change it on me.
>>>
>>
>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>
>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
> 
> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?


That's not a question of interest.

You ticked:  I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the answer to my question

Don't you know what breed your own cat is?

Null result.


Herc 

On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>
>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>
>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>
>
> That's not a question of interest.

I thought it was.

> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
> answer to my question
>
> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>
> Null result.

Wait.  What's that sound?

*buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*

Who let that chicken in here?

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote \
> On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>
>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>
>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>
>>
>> That's not a question of interest.
> 
> I thought it was.
> 
>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>> answer to my question
>>
>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>
>> Null result.
> 
> Wait.  What's that sound?
> 
> *buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*
> 
> Who let that chicken in here?
> 


Like I keep telling y'all 

I CAN'T MIND READ MORON.


Herc 

On 9/26/2010 3:59 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote \
>> On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>
>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>
>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>
>> I thought it was.
>>
>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>> answer to my question
>>>
>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>
>>> Null result.
>>
>> Wait. What's that sound?
>>
>> *buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*
>>
>> Who let that chicken in here?
>>
>
>
> Like I keep telling y'all
> I CAN'T MIND READ MORON.

Provide the password.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

 "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> That's not a question of interest.

You couldn't bend a plastic spoon even if I gave
you a draw full of lighters.

"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote ...
> 
> "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> That's not a question of interest.
> 
> You couldn't bend a plastic spoon even if I gave
> you a draw full of lighters.


For a "genuine" "fair shake" and "honest", "quick answer", "stay online"
offering guy you can't deliver anything except standard skeptic bullshit.


Herc
 

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
> On 9/26/2010 3:59 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote \
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>
>>> I thought it was.
>>>
>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>> answer to my question
>>>>
>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>
>>>> Null result.
>>>
>>> Wait. What's that sound?
>>>
>>> *buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*
>>>
>>> Who let that chicken in here?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Like I keep telling y'all
>> I CAN'T MIND READ MORON.
> 
> Provide the password.

To what?  You cheating again.

Herc 

On 9/26/2010 5:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>> On 9/26/2010 3:59 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote \
>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>
>>>> I thought it was.
>>>>
>>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>>> answer to my question
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Null result.
>>>>
>>>> Wait. What's that sound?
>>>>
>>>> *buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*
>>>>
>>>> Who let that chicken in here?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Like I keep telling y'all
>>> I CAN'T MIND READ MORON.
>>
>> Provide the password.
>
> To what? You cheating again.

Says the guy that broke his own rules.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote 
> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>
>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>
>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>
>>
>> That's not a question of interest.
>>
>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>> answer to my question
>>
>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>
>> Null result.
> 
> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is 
> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just 
> makes you look dishonest.
> 
> Sylvia.

I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.

If Daniel checked this text box it's not my fault.

You must agree to the following	  I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the answer to my question.


Looks like he asked a genuine question, forgot to ask genuine questions for 
the other 2 options, saw I was calling him on the test and played switcheroo.

He either lied on the form or switched answers.

But I will keep an eye out for morons in future.


Herc 

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
> On 9/26/2010 5:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:59 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote \
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought it was.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>>>> answer to my question
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Null result.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait. What's that sound?
>>>>>
>>>>> *buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*
>>>>>
>>>>> Who let that chicken in here?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like I keep telling y'all
>>>> I CAN'T MIND READ MORON.
>>>
>>> Provide the password.
>>
>> To what? You cheating again.
> 
> Says the guy that broke his own rules.
> 

Fuck man, you couldn't even come up with a number between 1 and 33.

line 44?????

I've never seen someone so incompetent filling out a simple form.

Herc 

On 9/26/2010 5:05 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>
>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>
>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>
>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>> answer to my question
>>>
>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>
>>> Null result.
>>
>> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is
>> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just
>> makes you look dishonest.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.

Don't assume anything.  All three were questions of interest to me.

But Sylvia was right.  The time to object was when you first received 
the questions via your online form, not after the test was near the end. 
  You provided me a ZIP file and promised to provide the password once I 
provided you with my question.  I provided you with my question and now 
you have to provide me with the password.

Or don't and be labeled a lying coward with no powers at all.


-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

On 9/26/2010 5:07 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>> On 9/26/2010 5:00 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:59 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote \
>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:44 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you
>>>>>>>>>>> prefer,
>>>>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought it was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>>>>> answer to my question
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Null result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wait. What's that sound?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *buk*buk*buk*buk*BUKAWWWWW!*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who let that chicken in here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Like I keep telling y'all
>>>>> I CAN'T MIND READ MORON.
>>>>
>>>> Provide the password.
>>>
>>> To what? You cheating again.
>>
>> Says the guy that broke his own rules.
>>
>
> Fuck man, you couldn't even come up with a number between 1 and 33.
>
> line 44?????
>
> I've never seen someone so incompetent filling out a simple form.

You said to provide a page number and roll a die.  4 was the line number 
and 4 was the number on the die.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
> On 9/26/2010 5:05 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>>> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>
>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>> answer to my question
>>>>
>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>
>>>> Null result.
>>>
>>> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is
>>> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just
>>> makes you look dishonest.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.
> 
> Don't assume anything.  All three were questions of interest to me.
> 
> But Sylvia was right.  The time to object was when you first received 
> the questions via your online form, not after the test was near the end. 
>  You provided me a ZIP file and promised to provide the password once I 
> provided you with my question.  I provided you with my question and now 
> you have to provide me with the password.
> 
> Or don't and be labeled a lying coward with no powers at all.
> 

Make me you impudent mortal.

Herc
 

On Sep 26, 7:44 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "DanielSan" <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote
>
[Herc originally posted "We have a player!

DanielSan asked one of the following 3 questions.

Name: DanielSan
Question1: Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
Question2: Will I get hired for construction?
Question3: Does God exist?

Here is my 'guess' which question he asked.
b77df81542f82636b6b34251b97406b2 ]


>
> >> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>
> >>www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip

D's answer was : Is my cat a tortoiseshell?

Herc then responded:

> That's not a question of interest.
>
> You ticked:  I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the answer to my question
>
> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>
> Null result.

Which boils down to " I can pick what question you chose as long as
you choose the one I pick".

The weasel thinks that is a `paranormal power'.

On 9/26/2010 5:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>> On 9/26/2010 5:05 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>>>> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>>
>>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>>> answer to my question
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Null result.
>>>>
>>>> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is
>>>> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just
>>>> makes you look dishonest.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.
>>
>> Don't assume anything. All three were questions of interest to me.
>>
>> But Sylvia was right. The time to object was when you first received
>> the questions via your online form, not after the test was near the
>> end. You provided me a ZIP file and promised to provide the password
>> once I provided you with my question. I provided you with my question
>> and now you have to provide me with the password.
>>
>> Or don't and be labeled a lying coward with no powers at all.
>>
>
> Make me you impudent mortal.

Fine.  You have chosen the latter, you lying coward with no powers at all.

Bye now.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote 
>> Fuck man, you couldn't even come up with a number between 1 and 33.
>>
>> line 44?????
>>
>> I've never seen someone so incompetent filling out a simple form.
> 
> You said to provide a page number and roll a die.  4 was the line number 
> and 4 was the number on the die.
> 


No you idiot.

Line Number (1-33)



Name: DanielSan

Question1: on

Page1: 129

Line1: 44

Interested: on


Herc 

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote...
> On 26/09/2010 10:05 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>>> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>
>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>> answer to my question
>>>>
>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>
>>>> Null result.
>>>
>>> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is
>>> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just
>>> makes you look dishonest.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.
> 
> I dare say, but this is meant to be a paranormal test, not a test of 
> deductive reasonining. If you seek to apply the latter, and then reject 
> trials where the reasoning gave the wrong answer, but accept those where 
> it gave the right answer, then you're testing a combination of 
> paranormal power and deductive reasoning, and the results, whatever they 
> are, only relate to the combination. Since such combinations are not 
> what skeptics societies are about, the results won't be of any interest 
> to ASS and the like.
> 
>>
>> If Daniel checked this text box it's not my fault.
>>
>> You must agree to the following I have a genuine or moderate interest in
>> finding out the answer to my question.
>>
>>
>> Looks like he asked a genuine question, forgot to ask genuine questions
>> for the other 2 options, saw I was calling him on the test and played
>> switcheroo.
>>
>> He either lied on the form or switched answers.
>>
>> But I will keep an eye out for morons in future.
> 
> Remember what you're trying to achieve here. Convincing yourself is not 
> the object of the exercise. You need to be squeaky clean if you want to 
> have any chance of convincing other people. That means that you either 
> object to a trial before performing it, or accept the outcome, whatever 
> it is.
> 
> You've previously indicated that it's sufficient if you have an interest 
> in the answer. The obvious course is to accept only those trials for 
> which you have an interest in the answers to all the questions. That way 
> the level of interest the questioner may, or may not, have, won't affect 
> the outcome.
> 
> Sylvia.


You have a point that statistically I'm not breaking 3:1 if I apply validity
criteria after the guess has been posted.  It looks like he changed
his answer to see what my guess was, since it's easier to forget to post real
questions on page 2 so his cat was likely a dummy question.... as in an unrelated 
option question.

But skeptics won't consider the data anyway, not from a website form
not from a usenet thread.  Because the passes could all be rigged from
communication between the asker and myself.  All I can hope to achieve
is people ask me a question, I get most of them right on usenet and some of
the askers say I guessed what was on their mind.

Although if I guess 40 out of 60 questions, I'll have 20 angry skeptics booing
every thread and 1 person saying "he got mine right!".

Looks like I'll have to fork out some dough for MindReading.com and buy
1,000 hits a day unless people start taking me seriously on the skeptics groups.


Herc


 

On 9/26/2010 5:16 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>> Fuck man, you couldn't even come up with a number between 1 and 33.
>>>
>>> line 44?????
>>>
>>> I've never seen someone so incompetent filling out a simple form.
>>
>> You said to provide a page number and roll a die. 4 was the line
>> number and 4 was the number on the die.
>>
>
>
> No you idiot.

Are you saying that you didn't ask to roll two dice on the first and one 
die on the second?

>
> Line Number (1-33)
>
>
>
> Name: DanielSan
>
> Question1: on
>
> Page1: 129

Page 12, die roll 9.

>
> Line1: 44

Line 4, die roll 4.

>
> Interested: on
>
>
> Herc


-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

On 9/26/2010 5:27 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote...
>> On 26/09/2010 10:05 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>>>> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still
>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not a question of interest.
>>>>>
>>>>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>>>>> answer to my question
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Null result.
>>>>
>>>> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is
>>>> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just
>>>> makes you look dishonest.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.
>>
>> I dare say, but this is meant to be a paranormal test, not a test of
>> deductive reasonining. If you seek to apply the latter, and then
>> reject trials where the reasoning gave the wrong answer, but accept
>> those where it gave the right answer, then you're testing a
>> combination of paranormal power and deductive reasoning, and the
>> results, whatever they are, only relate to the combination. Since such
>> combinations are not what skeptics societies are about, the results
>> won't be of any interest to ASS and the like.
>>
>>>
>>> If Daniel checked this text box it's not my fault.
>>>
>>> You must agree to the following I have a genuine or moderate interest in
>>> finding out the answer to my question.
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like he asked a genuine question, forgot to ask genuine questions
>>> for the other 2 options, saw I was calling him on the test and played
>>> switcheroo.
>>>
>>> He either lied on the form or switched answers.
>>>
>>> But I will keep an eye out for morons in future.
>>
>> Remember what you're trying to achieve here. Convincing yourself is
>> not the object of the exercise. You need to be squeaky clean if you
>> want to have any chance of convincing other people. That means that
>> you either object to a trial before performing it, or accept the
>> outcome, whatever it is.
>>
>> You've previously indicated that it's sufficient if you have an
>> interest in the answer. The obvious course is to accept only those
>> trials for which you have an interest in the answers to all the
>> questions. That way the level of interest the questioner may, or may
>> not, have, won't affect the outcome.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
>
> You have a point that statistically I'm not breaking 3:1 if I apply
> validity
> criteria after the guess has been posted. It looks like he changed
> his answer to see what my guess was, since it's easier to forget to post
> real
> questions on page 2 so his cat was likely a dummy question.... as in an
> unrelated option question.

But I didn't change the question, so pony up with the password.

> But skeptics won't consider the data anyway, not from a website form
> not from a usenet thread. Because the passes could all be rigged from
> communication between the asker and myself. All I can hope to achieve
> is people ask me a question, I get most of them right on usenet and some of
> the askers say I guessed what was on their mind.
>
> Although if I guess 40 out of 60 questions, I'll have 20 angry skeptics
> booing
> every thread and 1 person saying "he got mine right!".
>
> Looks like I'll have to fork out some dough for MindReading.com and buy
> 1,000 hits a day unless people start taking me seriously on the skeptics
> groups.

Herc, what you're showing here is that you have no superpowers at all.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
> On 9/26/2010 5:16 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>> Fuck man, you couldn't even come up with a number between 1 and 33.
>>>>
>>>> line 44?????
>>>>
>>>> I've never seen someone so incompetent filling out a simple form.
>>>
>>> You said to provide a page number and roll a die. 4 was the line
>>> number and 4 was the number on the die.
>>>
>>
>>
>> No you idiot.
> 
> Are you saying that you didn't ask to roll two dice on the first and one 
> die on the second?
> 
>>
>> Line Number (1-33)
>>
>>
>>
>> Name: DanielSan
>>
>> Question1: on
>>
>> Page1: 129
> 
> Page 12, die roll 9.
> 
>>
>> Line1: 44
> 
> Line 4, die roll 4.
> 
>>
>> Interested: on
>>
>>
>> Herc
> 


Okaay.  tell you what, I deleted the dice bit, if the skeptics do a test I can
give that clause just to them to make sure they aren't looking up bad quotes
to defeat the power.

Just think of a page number 1-333, line number 1-33

and a new question of interest.

If you don't want to try again no harm done, thanks for participating, sort of.


Herc 

On 9/26/2010 5:32 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
>> On 9/26/2010 5:16 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>>>> Fuck man, you couldn't even come up with a number between 1 and 33.
>>>>>
>>>>> line 44?????
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never seen someone so incompetent filling out a simple form.
>>>>
>>>> You said to provide a page number and roll a die. 4 was the line
>>>> number and 4 was the number on the die.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No you idiot.
>>
>> Are you saying that you didn't ask to roll two dice on the first and
>> one die on the second?
>>
>>>
>>> Line Number (1-33)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Name: DanielSan
>>>
>>> Question1: on
>>>
>>> Page1: 129
>>
>> Page 12, die roll 9.
>>
>>>
>>> Line1: 44
>>
>> Line 4, die roll 4.
>>
>>>
>>> Interested: on
>>>
>>>
>>> Herc
>>
>
>
> Okaay. tell you what, I deleted the dice bit, if the skeptics do a test
> I can
> give that clause just to them to make sure they aren't looking up bad
> quotes
> to defeat the power.
>
> Just think of a page number 1-333, line number 1-33
>
> and a new question of interest.
>
> If you don't want to try again no harm done, thanks for participating,
> sort of.

No.  Provide the password to the zip file you provided.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

 "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> For a "genuine" "fair shake" and "honest", "quick answer",
> "stay online" offering guy you can't deliver anything except
> standard skeptic bullshit.

I gave you three chances, one of which was so easy an
admitted faker would have scored at least SOME hits,
and you completely struck out.

I was more than fair with you, and you blew it. Completely.

"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote ..
> 
> "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> For a "genuine" "fair shake" and "honest", "quick answer",
>> "stay online" offering guy you can't deliver anything except
>> standard skeptic bullshit.
> 
> I gave you three chances, one of which was so easy an
> admitted faker would have scored at least SOME hits,
> and you completely struck out.
> 
> I was more than fair with you, and you blew it. Completely.

I have no idea what you're talking about, except guessing what coin
was attached to something, which is trivial pursuit and not relevant.


Herc 

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote 
> No.  Provide the password to the zip file you provided.
> 

The only reason you would want to see my guess was to see
if I was right.

That proves you switched answers.


Herc 

On 9/26/2010 5:55 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>> No. Provide the password to the zip file you provided.
>>
>
> The only reason you would want to see my guess was to see
> if I was right.
>
> That proves you switched answers.

No, I didn't.  Provide the password.

-- 
      DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226
-------------------------------------------
        EAC Warden - Occam Asylum
-------------------------------------------
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye
of reason: The Morning Daylight appears
plainer when you put out your Candle."
                   --Benjamin Franklin, 1758
-------------------------------------------

"DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote ...
> On 9/26/2010 5:55 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>> No. Provide the password to the zip file you provided.
>>>
>>
>> The only reason you would want to see my guess was to see
>> if I was right.
>>
>> That proves you switched answers.
> 
> No, I didn't.  Provide the password.


MAKE ME YOU IMPUDENT MORTAL!


Herc