Thread View: sci.skeptic
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by |-|ercules
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:12
Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: |-|ercules
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:12
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:12
25 lines
2018 bytes
2018 bytes
I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads. Posting more than one page number at once got the connections crossed! hahaha classic psychic's excuse! But I was sure I was getting answers - spider hidden in the corner, not enough evidence for a court case, mechanics bottles on the shelf, superintendant on the train, did my bit for solidarity (solar panels) etc. Think up 6 more questions, grab a couple six sided dice and you can post 1 question (PAGE# & LINE#) at a time until I tell you the answer. Or if you prefer to test out my FormToEmail website I'm just waiting on support to fix the web mail. Usenet might be the better protocol, one refinement at a time. This time use an MD5 that can use text pasted into an MD5 site, and since I can try all permutations of your questions in an MD5 site, concatenate a private string to the TEXT. (not FILE). Herc -- You can't live high up in the clouds without a few steps to climb.
Re: Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: Wolfgang Wildeblood
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:31
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:31
24 lines
2259 bytes
2259 bytes
On Sep 23, 2:12 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads. > > Posting more than one page number at once got the connections crossed! > > hahaha classic psychic's excuse! > > But I was sure I was getting answers - spider hidden in the corner, not enough > evidence for a court case, mechanics bottles on the shelf, superintendant on > the train, did my bit for solidarity (solar panels) etc. > > Think up 6 more questions, grab a couple six sided dice and you can post > 1 question (PAGE# & LINE#) at a time until I tell you the answer. > > Or if you prefer to test out my FormToEmail website I'm just waiting on support > to fix the web mail. Usenet might be the better protocol, one refinement at a time. No, it might not! Why don't you and Sylvia take this private discussion to email, and off usenet for good!? FFS, Herc!
Re: Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: |-|ercules
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:50
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:50
32 lines
2555 bytes
2555 bytes
"Wolfgang Wildeblood" <wolfgangwildeblood@gmail.com> wrote > On Sep 23, 2:12 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads. >> >> Posting more than one page number at once got the connections crossed! >> >> hahaha classic psychic's excuse! >> >> But I was sure I was getting answers - spider hidden in the corner, not enough >> evidence for a court case, mechanics bottles on the shelf, superintendant on >> the train, did my bit for solidarity (solar panels) etc. >> >> Think up 6 more questions, grab a couple six sided dice and you can post >> 1 question (PAGE# & LINE#) at a time until I tell you the answer. >> >> Or if you prefer to test out my FormToEmail website I'm just waiting on support >> to fix the web mail. Usenet might be the better protocol, one refinement at a time. > > No, it might not! Why don't you and Sylvia take this private > discussion to email, and off usenet for good!? FFS, Herc! It's just a psychic demo. Once we've got some real stats then I'll stop pestering the skeptics. If you could figure out "for you here every day" meant the internet was NOT a fad we wouldn't be doing this. We also have to try listing the page numbers in the MD5'd question file, that might have been the problem. Herc
Re: Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: Wolfgang Wildeblood
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:03
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:03
47 lines
3010 bytes
3010 bytes
On Sep 23, 2:50 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote: > "Wolfgang Wildeblood" <wolfgangwildebl...@gmail.com> wrote > > > > > > > On Sep 23, 2:12 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads. > > >> Posting more than one page number at once got the connections crossed! > > >> hahaha classic psychic's excuse! > > >> But I was sure I was getting answers - spider hidden in the corner, not enough > >> evidence for a court case, mechanics bottles on the shelf, superintendant on > >> the train, did my bit for solidarity (solar panels) etc. > > >> Think up 6 more questions, grab a couple six sided dice and you can post > >> 1 question (PAGE# & LINE#) at a time until I tell you the answer. > > >> Or if you prefer to test out my FormToEmail website I'm just waiting on support > >> to fix the web mail. Usenet might be the better protocol, one refinement at a time. > > > No, it might not! Why don't you and Sylvia take this private > > discussion to email, and off usenet for good!? FFS, Herc! > > It's just a psychic demo. Once we've got some real stats then I'll stop pestering > the skeptics. You're not pestering the skeptics, you're pestering aus.tv. (And you wouldn't be if I had my way.) > If you could figure out "for you here every day" meant the internet was NOT a fad > we wouldn't be doing this. Excuse you. You're a paranoid schizophrenic addicted to online porn. How do you know what's a fad? You can just fuck right off, Jerc.
Re: Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: Terrys
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:24
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:24
21 lines
2098 bytes
2098 bytes
On Sep 23, 3:50 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote: > It's just a psychic demo. Once we've got some real stats then I'll stop pestering > the skeptics. Translation: "I'll do it till I get one that's close, then claim `million to one odds" after hundreds of failures. > > If you could figure out "for you here every day" meant the internet was NOT a fad > we wouldn't be doing this. Translation: " I'll stomp and scream until you say I'm right - as a big fat lump, that's how I got my way as a child....." That won't work here Weasel, your years here should have taught you that. It goes without saying - this isn't posted in aus.tv.
Re: Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: |-|ercules
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:32
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:32
28 lines
2011 bytes
2011 bytes
"Wolfgang Wildeblood" <wolfgangwildeblood@gmail.com> wrote >> It's just a psychic demo. Once we've got some real stats then I'll stop pestering >> the skeptics. > > You're not pestering the skeptics, you're pestering aus.tv. (And you > wouldn't be if I had my way.) You can't even concentrate for 30 seconds. Have a go! http://tinyurl.com/WolfGang-Is-An-Idiot > > >> If you could figure out "for you here every day" meant the internet was NOT a fad >> we wouldn't be doing this. > > Excuse you. You're a paranoid schizophrenic addicted to online porn. > How do you know what's a fad? You can just fuck right off, Jerc. http://tinyurl.com/WolfGang-Is-An-Idiot Herc
Re: Ping Sylvia - Second test?
Author: |-|ercules
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:26
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:26
19 lines
1617 bytes
1617 bytes
"|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ... > I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads. OK I found my dark matter book, same dimensions 333 pages 33 lines. You can post like this: Question 1 - Page 111 - Line 11 MD5 = xxxxxxx Feel free to recycle any of your cosmology questions. Then I'll post the answer to Q1. It'll sound like you're talking to an Astronomy lecturer! Herc
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads