🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <359a6b2a.38470456@news.alt.net>, dmytrik@syntac.net says...
>

>
>Other ISPs are not publicly funded, are not volunteer supported, do
>not posses the status of a charity, their responsibility is to their
>stake holders, *OUR* responsibility is to the greater good of our
>community, and unless we serve as a vanguard of free speech and
>justice, we are *NOT* working in the best interest of our community.
>
So, to continue Jim's example, having this doctor shot and killed is to the 
greater good of our community? Or that person in Wendy's example stalked and 
sexually harassed/abused? This is for the benefit of the communicty?

Your problem, dmytri, is tunnel vision. Remember, your rights end *exactly* 
where mine begin. Therefore, your right to freedom of expression ends when that 
expression will or may cause direct bodilty harm to me (or that doctor, or that 
person Wendy citred, etc). You may not like it but you have _zero_ choice.

-- 
Marc Bissonnette
InternAlysis
Corporate Internet Research and Results!
http://www.internalysis.com