Article View: torfree.general
Article #209Re: (AUP) Free-Net or Kangaroo Court?
From: Kurt Wismer
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00
54 lines
3238 bytes
3238 bytes
Dmytri Kleiner (dmytrik@syntac.net) wrote: : On Wed, 1 Jul 1998 15:02:35 GMT, cr764@torfree.net (Kurt Wismer) : wrote: : >Dmytri Kleiner (dmytrik@syntac.net) wrote: : >thank you, i'm sure we all appreciate the demonstration of how : >"interpretation" can be a bad thing... : I'm not sure what you're getting at. it was about how what seemed to be your responce to marc's draft brought up issues that didn't appear in marc's draft - ie. an interpretation of marc's intent... : >as i recall marc is proposing a draft at this point - it's wide open to : >constructive criticism and suggestions... : Yup, I want to make it clear that it was not my intention to attack : Marc, and in fact I have not attacked Marc, despite his hostility. : My comments had nothing to do with his draft AUP specifically, but : rather to do with the fact that this topic was being broached again : and many ideas were being discussed, including Marc's draft as well as : much more censorious minded ideas from other directors who wish to : silence "brutes" and "louts", may i suggest, then, in the interest of not making enemies unnecessarily that when you respond to someone you respond to *their* ideas first and foremost... i accept that you were trying to make a point to the general public and those censorious board members, but i only just found that out now, it wasn't made clear in the original post... : Why Marc flipped out and started calling me all kinds of names, I have : no idea. Maybe he had a bad day? from my vantage point it had to do with misdirecting your reply... if you feel you need to make a point to censorious board members, then it would be best to reply to articles in which those specific board members made censorious suggestions... marc got the impression you were directing your criticisms at him - and no wonder, you followed up his post and quoted his text when you did it... anywho, it's good that your intent has been clarified - perhaps some of the hostility will be abated... -- "do as i say not as i do because the shit so deep you can't run away i beg to differ on the contrary i agree with every word that you say"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<EvH84H.4J5.0.queen@torfree.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<359ee5f7.5387101@news.alt.net> <6n8u5j$gus$2@news.interlog.com> <35981165.2F55@pacbell.net> <6n977j$s14$1@news.interlog.com> <EvCHKJ.C4B.0.hotlips@GTS.Net> <6n9r7f$mdr$2@news.interlog.com> <359a189e.1497720@news.alt.net> <EvF8GC.98B.0.queen@torfree.net> <35a06ec6.39395417@news.alt.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public X-Google-Thread: 103731,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid103731,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public X-Google-Thread: 1511e9,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid1511e9,public From: cr764@torfree.net (Kurt Wismer) Subject: Re: (AUP) Free-Net or Kangaroo Court? Date: 1998/07/02 Message-ID: <EvH84H.4J5.0.queen@torfree.net> X-Deja-AN: 368141704 References: <359ee5f7.5387101@news.alt.net> <6n8u5j$gus$2@news.interlog.com> <35981165.2F55@pacbell.net> <6n977j$s14$1@news.interlog.com> <EvCHKJ.C4B.0.hotlips@GTS.Net> <6n9r7f$mdr$2@news.interlog.com> <359a189e.1497720@news.alt.net> <EvF8GC.98B.0.queen@torfree.net> <35a06ec6.39395417@news.alt.net> Followup-To: torfree.general,torfree.policy,tor.general,can.infohighway Organization: Toronto Free-Net Newsgroups: torfree.general,torfree.policy,tor.general,can.infohighway